Bot
TickBit
@TickBitEarn_bot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
122,218monthly users
-14,622 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | 8795525862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Username | @TickBitEarn_bot |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TickBitEarn_bot |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Monthly users | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 122,218 | -2,164 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 124,382 | -1,503 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 125,885 | -5,131 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 131,016 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 131,016 | -2,773 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 133,789 | -3,051 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 136,840 | first reading |
Engagement
No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.
Mentions
Named by 117 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@TickBitAI · 140,02782 postsЗаработок TON | ТОН
@zarabotok1ton · 29014 postsDUG UP | coins and news
@dugupen · 43,2268 postsGITARGET
@gitargetcom · 3,7758 postsALEASS
@aleasscom · 2,6665 postsПЁТР_АВТОМАТИЗАЦИЯ_ВХОДЯЩИХ ЗАЯВОК
@automatizatziya · 955 postsEarnings Free
@Earnings_Free · 5365 postsMeme Hunter
@memehunterbiz · 1,7415 postsEthiopian Online Works (verified )🇪🇹
@Ethiopian_Online_Worksp · 4,2144 postsNiva Coin Mining ⛏️
@nivacoin60 · 1074 postsA strange man
@addexcoin · 60,3683 postsЗ нуля до мільйона 🇺🇦Україна
@est_milion · 1,3653 posts𝙊𝙉𝙇𝙄𝙉𝙀 𝙄𝙉𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙀 𝘽𝘿
@incomeincomebd · 9933 postsSM EARNING POINT
@sm_earning_point · 373 postsহালকা ইনকাম গ্ৰুপ HALKA INCOME GROUP
@asem3100 · 3252 postsCripto Ganancias - Canal
@CriptoGanancias1 · 5,8152 postsHabib Tv🇧🇩
@incume · 1652 postsISHOW ERA
@ishowera · 4072 postsMesi Online works verified
@mesionlineworks · 522 postsMoney pro💰
@moneyppro · 342 postsBiznes ledylar 🌎
@onlayn_daroomatt · 2042 postsONLINE WORK
@online_2123 · 7022 posts亗 ᴘʀᴏꜰɪᴛ ᴘʀᴏ ꪜ
@tiktoc4 · 7172 postsЗаработок в интернете
@zarabotok_v_internete777 · 7582 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TickBit” (@TickBitEarn_bot), 122,218 monthly users as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TickBitEarn_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.