天梦主频道 pinned a file

Channel
天梦主频道
@TianMengPD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
150subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002191435373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TianMengPD |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TianMengPD |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 150 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 151 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 149 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 149 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 25.0% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
2026 8-1--[9.2.1正式版] 9.2混淆混太狠了好像不能用,用这个版本 想不到一个月后我们又见面了,其实很早我就能更,但是我很懒😅 更新了:状态修改功能,新线程并行模式,一键解设备清理,陀螺仪自瞄 修复了:陀螺仪自瞄4象限方向,内核劫持失效,普通陀螺仪防重启 优化了:代码结构拆分,多驱动切换稳定性 这次更新非常👌🏻哦,有问题下方留言
Signed 悦
已倒下
🤨2
Signed 悦
没号了
Signed 悦
日常考验u3d基本功
👍2
Signed 悦
目前进度就剩子追和无后了
Signed 悦
我是tusi我妈死了
Signed 悦
Unity都换版本了你还指望一些特征能用吗
Signed TUSI Official-Channel
妈的子弹数组不见了
Signed 悦
能不能资助我15买个过检基址扫描 目前已修复绘制,正在修复子追自瞄,下个版本添加陀螺仪自瞄分别为内核劫持版和模块写入版😘
Signed 悦
等更新
👍2❤1
Signed 悦
TUSI-NewR30Beta1_NDK_Test.sh TUSI新版NDK混淆测试强度 注: 启用了VMP 正确密码: TUSI_Nb_NDK
Signed TUSI Official-Channel
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TianMengPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 327,990 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TianMengPD named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“天梦主频道” (@TianMengPD), 150 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TianMengPD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.