4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,893–4,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 07:53
4,899
-30
25 Aug 2026, 05:16
4,929
-8
24 Aug 2026, 21:45
4,937
no change
24 Aug 2026, 21:30
4,937
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.09%
avg views ÷ 4,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
20 (31 July 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
4,986
Reactions total
126
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 12s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
126 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
100
79.4%
❤
19
15.1%
🐳
5
3.97%
🤯
2
1.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
8/24 FREE PLAY
The Twins are in a great spot to generate offense at Sutter Health Park, which has been the most home-run-friendly stadium in baseball this season with 217 homers already. Jeffrey Springs has been especially vulnerable in Sacramento, posting a 6.46 home ERA while allowing 2.5 HR/9, and Minnesota projects to load its lineup with right-handed bats against the lefty. That gives hitters like Byron Buxton…
8/21 FREE PLAY
New York enters 11-6 this month and has been consistently producing quality contact, ranking among MLB’s best teams in both barrel rate and hard-hit rate. Sean Manaea carries some risk on the mound, but the Mets have the offensive firepower to compensate, particularly against Sean Burke, whose strong 3.15 ERA comes with enough hard contact allowed to create opportunities for this lineup. Chicago has …
1 year of all plays only $350. Normally 1k
NFL, NCAAF, fab 4, parlays and nfl props for 365 days….less than $1 a day LFG
Monster football season incoming LFG don’t sleep
https://whop.com/checkout/plan_h2XgeiepCRwga
8/15 FREE PLAY
Randy Dobnak looks like a clear regression candidate despite his 2.00 ERA, carrying an extremely concerning 3.2% K-BB rate with estimators ranging from a 4.41 dERA to a 4.90 SIERA. Neither offense inspires much confidence, so the pitching and bullpen advantages become even more important. Los Angeles has the stronger defense and its bullpen has quietly posted some of the best underlying numbers in ba…
8/12 FREE PLAY
The Cubs are in a strong spot against Miles Mikolas, who has struggled badly this season with a 5.89 ERA and now faces a Chicago lineup featuring one hitter who has absolutely owned him. Pete Crow-Armstrong is 8-for-11 against Mikolas with five home runs, an incredible track record that makes him especially appealing against a low-velocity, pitch-to-contact starter. PCA’s pull power matches up well w…
8/10 FREE PLAY
Milwaukee is the play behind Logan Henderson, who has been outstanding with a 2.70 ERA, 0.90 WHIP, and 62 strikeouts against just 10 walks over 50 innings. His underlying numbers support the production, including a 2.61 xERA and 2.94 xFIP, so there’s plenty of reason to believe his strong start is legitimate. Casey Mize has been solid with a 3.40 ERA, but some of his underlying performance suggests r…
🔥7❤3🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThreePeatFreePlays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DPatt’s Free Bets @dpattssportspicks · 67,178 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 24 August 2026
SEANPERRYWINS FREE TELEGRAM🔐 @seanperrywins · 54,596 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 24 August 2026
Kleos Sports Free Plays 🐐 @kleossportsfreeplays · 131,336 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ThreePeatGoat Free Plays” (@ThreePeatFreePlays), 4,899 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThreePeatFreePlays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.