Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ThreePeatGoat Free Plays

Channel

ThreePeatGoat Free Plays

@ThreePeatFreePlays

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,899subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153766304
TypeChannel
Username@ThreePeatFreePlays
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ThreePeatFreePlays

Growth

4,8994,9374,91824 August 2026 — 4,937 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,937 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,929 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,899 subscribers24 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,893–4,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 07:534,899-30
25 Aug 2026, 05:164,929-8
24 Aug 2026, 21:454,937no change
24 Aug 2026, 21:304,937first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.09%
avg views ÷ 4,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total4,986
Reactions total126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 12s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10079.4%
1915.1%
🐳53.97%
🤯21.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC106 views5 reactionsread 24 August 2026

8/24 FREE PLAY The Twins are in a great spot to generate offense at Sutter Health Park, which has been the most home-run-friendly stadium in baseball this season with 217 homers already. Jeffrey Springs has been especially vulnerable in Sacramento, posting a 6.46 home ERA while allowing 2.5 HR/9, and Minnesota projects to load its lineup with right-handed bats against the lefty. That gives hitters like Byron Buxton

🔥41

23 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC156 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Jump on our daily parlays package for 30 days only $19.99 1 parlay everyday all sports. Don’t sleep https://whop.com/checkout/plan_KTT8nXFsZsumC

🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC205 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026

8/21 FREE PLAY New York enters 11-6 this month and has been consistently producing quality contact, ranking among MLB’s best teams in both barrel rate and hard-hit rate. Sean Manaea carries some risk on the mound, but the Mets have the offensive firepower to compensate, particularly against Sean Burke, whose strong 3.15 ERA comes with enough hard contact allowed to create opportunities for this lineup. Chicago has

🔥3🤯1

21 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC198 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

1 year of all plays only $350. Normally 1k NFL, NCAAF, fab 4, parlays and nfl props for 365 days….less than $1 a day LFG Monster football season incoming LFG don’t sleep https://whop.com/checkout/plan_h2XgeiepCRwga

🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC215 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

4 straight FAB Green Days and back to back parlay winners Don’t sleep!! 7 days $7 https://whop.com/checkout/plan_CYO3EudN2xMQT

🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC282 views8 reactionsread 24 August 2026

8/15 FREE PLAY Randy Dobnak looks like a clear regression candidate despite his 2.00 ERA, carrying an extremely concerning 3.2% K-BB rate with estimators ranging from a 4.41 dERA to a 4.90 SIERA. Neither offense inspires much confidence, so the pitching and bullpen advantages become even more important. Los Angeles has the stronger defense and its bullpen has quietly posted some of the best underlying numbers in ba

🔥6🐳2

13 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC285 views18 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Free play ROUT 💰💰💰💰 Who cashed??? 🔥🔥🔥

🔥152🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC291 views12 reactionsread 24 August 2026

8/12 FREE PLAY The Cubs are in a strong spot against Miles Mikolas, who has struggled badly this season with a 5.89 ERA and now faces a Chicago lineup featuring one hitter who has absolutely owned him. Pete Crow-Armstrong is 8-for-11 against Mikolas with five home runs, an incredible track record that makes him especially appealing against a low-velocity, pitch-to-contact starter. PCA’s pull power matches up well w

🔥102

10 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC298 views11 reactionsread 24 August 2026

8/10 FREE PLAY Milwaukee is the play behind Logan Henderson, who has been outstanding with a 2.70 ERA, 0.90 WHIP, and 62 strikeouts against just 10 walks over 50 innings. His underlying numbers support the production, including a 2.61 xERA and 2.94 xFIP, so there’s plenty of reason to believe his strong start is legitimate. Casey Mize has been solid with a 3.40 ERA, but some of his underlying performance suggests r

🔥73🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThreePeatFreePlays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DPatt’s Free Bets
@dpattssportspicks · 67,178
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 24 August 2026
SEANPERRYWINS FREE TELEGRAM🔐
@seanperrywins · 54,596
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 24 August 2026
Kleos Sports Free Plays 🐐
@kleossportsfreeplays · 131,336
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ThreePeatGoat Free Plays” (@ThreePeatFreePlays), 4,899 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThreePeatFreePlays.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.