Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

На связи с тьмой | Клуб Романтики

@ThedarksideMalek

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,617subscribers

+252 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002641899503
TypeChannel
Username@ThedarksideMalek
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ThedarksideMalek

Growth

12,23512,65012,442.56 August 2026 — 12,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,440 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,650 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,235 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,419 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,338 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,533 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,467 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,617 subscribers12,6176 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,173–12,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:4312,617+150
12 Aug 2026, 22:0512,467-66
11 Aug 2026, 21:5112,533+195
10 Aug 2026, 23:1112,338-81
10 Aug 2026, 00:0212,419+184
8 Aug 2026, 23:2112,235-415
7 Aug 2026, 23:0612,650+210
7 Aug 2026, 02:2412,440+75
6 Aug 2026, 09:1512,365no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:0712,365first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 12,617 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held41 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total82,897
Reactions total10,699
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 02s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,699 reactions across 41 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,92827.4%
2,52323.6%
💋2,51023.5%
❤‍🔥2,32221.7%
😍2352.20%
🍌1251.17%
custom 5193200233546272591560.523%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,699reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 41 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ThedarksideMalek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC639 views288 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

И продолжают рубрику по альтернативной Вселенной работы нашей Даши 🥰 В первых двух работах ребята попали в Assassin’s Creed 🤭 А в остальных во Властелин колец ☺️ Подходят ли им эти образы?🌟 Пишите в комментариях 🥔 #обработки #яонт #рэйчел #алекс #агата

❤‍🔥241🔥25😍11💋10custom 51932002335462725911

12 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,870 views353 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @tepishsdiaryVideo

Продолжаем серию ЛСЗ видео от На связи с тьмой, но в компании модницы Сары 💎 #ДиТ_видео #лсз

💋249🔥63❤‍🔥328custom 51932002335462725911

12 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC≈1,910 views312 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Утро доброе, дорогие ☺ Если бы можно было оставить только 3 фаворита из КР, то кого вы бы выбрали? ☺ Пишите в комментариях 🥰 #видео #эдит #малек #одри #сн3 #секретнебес3

💋25825❤‍🔥15🔥9😍3custom 51932002335462725912

11 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC814 views282 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

И продолжают рубрику по альтернативной Вселенной работы нашей Саши 🌟 Ребятам нужно окунуться в мир фантастики 🌟 Подходят ли им эти образы?🌟 Пишите в комментариях 🌟 #обработки #яонт #эзра #алекс #агата #эллиа #рэйчел

💋239❤‍🔥25😍10custom 51932002335462725915🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,840 views259 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @tepishsdiaryVideo

Мы продолжаем неделю ЛСЗ вторым видео от На связи с тьмой, на этот раз с молчуном из племени сиу Джейкобом 🌲 #ДиТ_видео #лсз

🔥22617❤‍🔥11😍4💋1

11 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,710 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @kseleniaaPhoto

▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ ▫️ ▫️ Небольшой розыгрыш для наших любимых подписчиков. ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 1. Подписаться на @kseleniaa 2. Нажать на кнопку «Участвую» ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ 1 место — 10 круток 🤩 2 место — крафт любой бронзы на выбор 🤩 3 место — 10 чашек 🍵 4 место — обработка с вашим любимым фаворитом от @kseleniaa 🤩 5–8 места — 150 алмазов 💎 9–10 места — 120 алмазов 💎 ▫️Итоги: 15.08.2026 Всем желаем удачи и победы!🤩

🔥3918🍌7💋1

11 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,250 views293 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Доброе, дорогие 💕 У Малека и Одри тут прекрасное совместное утро ❗️ Маша показала нам, как оно проходит ✨ А с чего начинается ваше утро? Пишите в комментариях 🍀 #обработка #малек #одри #сн3

🔥23634😍13custom 51932002335462725918❤‍🔥1💋1

10 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,940 views315 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @tepishsdiaryVideo

Завершаем день ещё одним видео от На связи с тьмой, но вне рубрики, просто красивые Джеймбер ;) #ДиТ_видео #лсз

🔥249💋4614❤‍🔥4😍2

10 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈2,030 views282 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Наша Джули фотографировала ребят, но что-то счастлив только Алекс, ведь это он притащил всех в этот магазин. 🕺 Как вы думаете, кто из них был недоволен больше? 🐱 #ииарт #малек #эзра #алекс #сн3 #яонт2

🔥24022❤‍🔥13😍6custom 51932002335462725911

10 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,780 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @vinegret_foxPhoto

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Разом із друзями ми підготували для вас цікавий розіграш!🤩 Карти, алмази та зірки вже чекають на своїх щасливих власників.🃏 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 1.😜👩‍🍼+120😶‍🌫️+ 150 зірок ⭐️ 2.😘👩‍🍼+120😶‍🌫️+150 зірок ⭐️ 3.😭👦+80 😶‍🌫️+100 зірок ⭐️ 4.😍👦+80😶‍🌫️+ обра 5.😎👦+80😶‍🌫️+ обра 6.☺️👦+80😶‍🌫️ 7. 😔😇+ 40😶‍🌫️ 8.😱😇+40😶‍🌫️ 9. 😔😇+40😶‍🌫️ 10.❤️😇+40😶‍🌫️ 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Підписатися на наші канали: ❤️@vinegret_fox ❤️@suminiiiw ❤️@reysann2 👍Результати — 01.0

40🔥15🍌6💋1

10 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC≈2,080 views303 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Доброе, драгоценные 🌟 У Малека с Одри горячее утро 🌟 Какие истории будете проходить на АЛ перед обновой? Работу сделала наша Рэй 🌟 #обработка #малек #одри #сн3 #секретнебес3

💋24135❤‍🔥15🔥8😍4

9 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,340 views342 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Пс, дорогие, вы не спите? 🤩 Я связала прекрасных Джейн и Джейкоба, и вот мы совсем скоро хотим сделать розыгрыш на эти игрушки. Хотели бы? 🥰🥰

281❤‍🔥35🔥16custom 51932002335462725914🍌3😍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @ThedarksideMalek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 4,027 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На связи с тьмой | Клуб Романтики” (@ThedarksideMalek), 12,617 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThedarksideMalek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.