Channel
@The_Wolf_Gems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001518482140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Wolf_Gems |
| Description | Welcome wolfs 🐺,I update upcoming presales or launches on BSC & ETH. Wolf searches for the safe projects in the crypto space. I tend to research before making calls but always DYOR/TAYOR 👩💻 FOR INQUIRIES: @JeeerH or @ellazz |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 27 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Wolf_Gems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 37 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 37 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Crypto Daily News. Today's highlights: - Hackers stole $3.3 million from users who generated Ethereum addresses through the Profanity service. - Ethereum Proof-of-Work suffers replay attack, price drops 30%. - Animoca Brands to acquire WePlay Media, developer of MotoGP™ Championship Quest. - Yuga Labs will launch a $50M NFT collection called Mecha Apes Have a nice day! ☀️
Crypto X-Seed is a next-generation Binary Play to Earn Universe with TWO distinctly separate Game Universes. The Goal is to drastically minimize the player's LOI (Loss on Investment). Project INFO: HERE (Unique Concept) KEY Innovation: -Limitless Fight to Earn Potential -What-You-Earn-Is-What-You-Get Rewards System -No Rewards Locking Mechanism -Next Generation Dual Universe Play to Earn Ecosystem -NFTs are minted…
The Wolf Gems ☎️ (NO PAID CALLS) pinned «https://whitepaper.cryptoxseed.com/crypto-x-seed-gamepedia/game-intro»
https://whitepaper.cryptoxseed.com/crypto-x-seed-gamepedia/game-intro
The Wolf Gems ☎️ (NO PAID CALLS) pinned «📍https://t.me/CryptoXSeed»
📍https://t.me/CryptoXSeed
The Wolf Gems ☎️ (NO PAID CALLS) pinned «📍Keep an eye on this, Safu Team, Unique P2E system»
📍Keep an eye on this, Safu Team, Unique P2E system
The Wolf Gems ☎️ (NO PAID CALLS) pinned a photo
Crypto X-Seed is a next-generation Binary Play to Earn Universe with two distinctly separate Game Universes. Crypto X-Seed fundamentally aims to solve the inherent problems of a traditional P2E Model. The goal is to drastically minimize the player's LOI (Loss on Investment). Our fresh and new approach in GameFi will start a New Revolution of Next-Generation Play to Earn NFT Games simulating real-word scenarios. W…
https://twitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1557170159026143232?s=20&t=w0NY6DoMj7lsLZpOFVhBIQ
https://twitter.com/DefiSportsCoin/status/1553078454764965888?t=J9UYOge-xuBVBaCs5-VSgg&s=19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @The_Wolf_Gems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 672,001 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@The_Wolf_Gems named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Wolf Gems ☎️ (NO PAID CALLS)” (@The_Wolf_Gems), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Wolf_Gems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.