Channel
@The_Lancet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,940subscribers
+425 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001424772341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Lancet |
| Created | 17 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Lancet |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 17,940 | +50 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 17,890 | +79 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 17,811 | +23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 17,788 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 17,785 | +13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 17,772 | +10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 17,762 | +21 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 17,741 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 17,730 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:33 | 17,728 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:05 | 17,722 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 17,714 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 17,706 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 17,701 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 17,692 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 17,679 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 17,676 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 17,666 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 17,659 | +17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 17,642 | first reading |
105 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 105 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 85.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[Articles] Use of procalcitonin point-of-care testing to guide de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in adults with suspected bacterial sepsis in a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh: a randomised controlled open-label trial https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(26)00424-4/fulltext?rss=yes In this single-centre trial in Bangladesh, procalcitonin-guided de-escalation reduced the duration of antib…
[Articles] Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and exercise capacity in iron-deficient kidney transplant recipients: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in the Netherlands https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(26)00422-0/fulltext?rss=yes Ferric carboxymaltose did not improve exercise capacity or most secondary outcomes, arguing against routine supplementation to improve functional capacity…
[Articles] Pediatric yeast fungaemia species patterns, resistance profiles, and outcomes: a 20-year surveillance study in Paris, France https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(26)00430-X/fulltext?rss=yes Pediatric yeast bloodstream infections exhibit distinct epidemiological characteristics, species distribution, antifungal exposure patterns, and outcomes compared with adult infections. Futur…
[Articles] Women’s leadership development programmes and gender equality: a systematic review in healthcare, academia and beyond https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(26)00438-4/fulltext?rss=yes WLDPs appear to support individual development, but current evidence cannot establish organisational transformation. Their broader equity potential depends on structural accountability: transparent …
[Department of Error] Department of Error https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)01781-2/fulltext?rss=yes Jaffe S. Cyclospora in the USA: why is it so hard to stop? Lancet 2026; 408: 394–95—This World Report has been changed to indicate that Virginia health officials do not question the CDC's conclusion linking a nine-state outbreak to contaminated lettuce from Taylor Farms in Mexico. Thi…
[Department of Error] Department of Error https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)01780-0/fulltext?rss=yes Zarocostas J. Search for new Global Fund Executive Director intensifies. Lancet 2026; 408: 107—This World Report has been corrected to make clear that Matshidiso Moeti is not a candidate for Executive Director of The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. This correction…
[Articles] Efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus nimotuzumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-refractory recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(26)00423-2/fulltext?rss=yes Liposomal irinotecan plus nimotuzumab showed preliminary antitumor activity and manageable safety in heavily pretreated pa…
[Articles] Targeted left ventricular lead placement in biventricular pacing for heart failure: a national, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in Denmark https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)01597-7/fulltext?rss=yes In patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS, targeted left ventricular lead placement at the site of latest electrical activation did not reduce the …
[Comment] Cardiac resynchronisation therapy: 30 years of progress https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)01712-5/fulltext?rss=yes Cardiac resynchronisation therapy with biventricular pacing (BiV-CRT) revolutionised the treatment of heart failure in patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB). Its development, founded upon observations that LBBB leads to cardiac impairment,1 progressed t…
❤1
https://www.instagram.com/updates_in_medicine?igsi=eWJ2N3p2MmxvNXJ0&utm_source=qr
[Comment] Rethinking success after atrial fibrillation ablation: when sham is more than a placebo https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)01651-X/fulltext?rss=yes Catheter ablation has revolutionised the management of atrial fibrillation. Over the past two decades, randomised trials have established pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as the most effective treatment for reducing atrial fibrilla…
[Series] Cardiovascular disease in pregnancy: physiology, global burden, risk stratification, and opportunities in care https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)01234-1/fulltext?rss=yes Cardiovascular disease remains one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide and a major driver of long-term morbidity. Yet, pregnancy-related cardiovascular complications are often under-recogni…
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @The_Lancet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Lancet” (@The_Lancet), 17,940 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Lancet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.