Something
β€8π2π2

Channel
@TheTelegate
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
77,939subscribers
+3,907 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001725669284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheTelegate |
| Description | β‘οΈ Welcome to The Telegate β‘οΈAuthor @sshlg Get ready to go deep on artificial intelligence, build on Web3, push boundaries, and make waves in tech. This is passion, not just talk. BIO: https://sshlg.me |
| Created | 24 October 2022 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheTelegate |
Technology β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 77,939 | +484 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 77,455 | +194 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 77,261 | +178 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 77,083 | +127 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 76,956 | +140 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 76,816 | +210 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 76,606 | +214 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 76,392 | +165 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 76,227 | +109 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:04 | 76,118 | +73 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:29 | 76,045 | +50 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 75,995 | +26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 75,969 | +60 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 75,909 | +104 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 75,805 | +118 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 75,687 | +93 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 75,594 | -72 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 75,666 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 75,668 | +183 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 75,485 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 24 October 2022 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 105 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (24 October 2022 β 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,780 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 27 September 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
824 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 439 | 53.3% | |
| π | 211 | 25.6% | |
| π₯ | 77 | 9.34% | |
| β‘ | 63 | 7.65% | |
| π | 19 | 2.31% | |
| π | 11 | 1.33% | |
| π | 2 | 0.243% | |
| π€© | 2 | 0.243% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 824 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2022 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @TheTelegate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 October 2022 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Something
β€8π2π2
AI-generated code looks finished until you have to change it The first iterations often feel great. An agent builds the feature, fixes the bug, and returns a confident βdone.β Then the project starts living, and somebody has to change old behaviour without breaking the parts nobody remembers. That is when the missing work surfaces (a requirement fell out of context, a test never ran, the documentation describes an β¦
β€35π7π6π₯6
Response speed = revenue. Here's proof. I used to reply to clients myself. Wake up β 15 unread messages. By the time I got through them, half had already moved on. One client messaged on a Friday night. I replied Monday morning. He'd already bought from someone else. That was a $3,000 deal. Gone. I calculated: I was losing 20β30% of inbound leads every month β not because of price, not because of product. Just beβ¦
β€88π29π₯7
Recently, together with eSIM Plus, we launched a side project in collaboration with Nicegram β DEGENPHONE. Itβs an NFT-based virtual phone number on the TON blockchain. The first 1000 numbers were distributed through a pool at 100 TON each, and the pool sold out in just 8 minutes. Honestly, that was an unexpectedly quick and super satisfying success at such an early stage. Usually, Iβm used to grinding hard before β¦
β€109π30π₯19β‘9π€©2
Powerfull Update from Atomind AI! π Struggling with chatbots that only skim the surface? π€ We've been there too! Yesterday, we tackled a common frustration head-on: the challenge of retrieving accurate data from websites. While most chatbots rely on meta information and make educated guesses, we at Atomind AI have revolutionized the process! π οΈ Now, exploring any website is as simple as sending a link and asking a β¦
β€41π18β‘14π₯10π8
Exciting News! π Today, I launched another AI agent that helps you build amazing business connections with people who truly match your needs. This agent gathers information about you and finds the best connections to help you: - Form partnerships - Make sales - Meet like-minded individuals for leisure π Check it out here: Connect Link
π17β€16
π€ Two AI agents that make my workday easier! π€ Not long ago, I wrote a LinkedIn post about a Telegram bot I built for myselfβan AI agent connected to multiple top-tier models, including the trendy DeepSeek, OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini. It can generate images, read PDFs, and even extract content from images. Basically, everything I need in one place. When I donβt have a computer handy, this bot is a game-changer. I esβ¦
π17β€14π₯4β‘1
For years, RememBear was my trusty companion in managing passwords. When it closed, I was lost. But then, I found Bitwarden. It's like finding a new best friendβsecure, reliable, and easy to use. Loving the new chapter! (Not an ad, just genuinely impressed!)
π32β€20π6π₯6β‘3π2
Hey everyone π, Big news! π I've just finished the first version of my new bot, @WhitepaperTigerBot π This little genius is saving me hours of writing and creating docs for projects. No more long nights! πβοΈ It's like having a mini-me that's all about making writing faster and easier. π Whether it's for tech stuff or cool blockchain projects, this bot's got it covered. ππ‘ So excited to share this journey with youβ¦
π24β€13π₯6π3
π Join the Next Chapter with Solana Mobile's Saga! π Hey, community! Exciting news from Solana Mobile: after our initial sell-out success, we're now launching Chapter 2, set to ship in the first half of 2025. This is your chance to be part of a groundbreaking journey in mobile technology. π What's Next? - Chapter 2: Aiming for at least 100,000 units with your support. Preorder now to secure your spot and be part ofβ¦
β€17β‘8π₯5
π GPT-4 vs Claude-3: My Experience π€ Hey friends! Today I want to talk about two powerful language models: GPT-4 from OpenAI and Claude-3 from Anthropic. While both systems impress with their natural language processing capabilities, my experience testing them has led me to a definite opinion. As you know, I like to be objective and base my judgments on real experience. And in this case, my experience working withβ¦
β€14π5π₯4β‘3
π Elevate Your Digital Game with Rive π Rive is revolutionizing how we interact with the digital world, empowering both designers and developers to craft animated, interactive experiences effortlessly. Imagine bringing to life game UIs, educational content, and even animated emojis - Rive turns your digital visions into engaging realities. π Why Rive Stands Out: - Seamless Collaboration: Streamlines the creative pβ¦
β€12π3β‘2π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @TheTelegate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@TheTelegate edited 1 post after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βThe Telegate π€β (@TheTelegate), 77,939 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheTelegate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.