Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Telegate 🐤

Channel

The Telegate 🐤

@TheTelegate

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

80,270subscribers

+6,238 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725669284
TypeChannel
Username@TheTelegate
Description⚡️ Welcome to The Telegate ⚡️Author @sshlg Get ready to go deep on artificial intelligence, build on Web3, push boundaries, and make waves in tech. This is passion, not just talk. BIO: https://sshlg.me
Created24 October 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheTelegate

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

74,03280,27077,1517 August 20269 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net +6,238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,096–81,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 15:4580,270+99
8 Nov 2026, 11:0180,171+2
7 Nov 2026, 09:1080,169+9
6 Nov 2026, 12:2880,160+58
5 Nov 2026, 14:5780,102+74
4 Nov 2026, 11:3180,028+50
3 Nov 2026, 14:5679,978+110
2 Nov 2026, 12:3979,868+98
1 Nov 2026, 12:1179,770+135
31 Oct 2026, 10:0779,635+120
30 Oct 2026, 09:5979,515+36
29 Oct 2026, 08:2979,479+77
28 Oct 2026, 04:5179,402-21
27 Oct 2026, 03:1579,423+67
26 Oct 2026, 04:1779,356-48
25 Oct 2026, 01:5779,404-99
23 Oct 2026, 22:5879,503-139
22 Oct 2026, 23:0979,642+7
21 Oct 2026, 20:3579,635+76
20 Oct 2026, 16:5679,559first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 24 October 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.82%
avg views ÷ 80,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.482%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held34 (24 October 2022 – 9 November 2026)
Views total29,466
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 19:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,077 reactions across 32 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤62858.3%
👍23221.5%
🔥979.01%
⚡746.87%
👏191.76%
🎉131.21%
😁90.836%
🤩30.279%
👻20.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,077 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2022 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
82
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 33 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheTelegate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 October 2022 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC616 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Your AI agent budget can rise 680% without a single extra conversation. Front raised Autopilot’s starting price from $0.05 to $0.39 per conversation this week. At unchanged volume, that starting line item becomes 7.8 times larger. Together AI raised Qwen3.7-Max serverless prices by 67%: input went from $1.50 to $2.50 per million tokens, output from $4.50 to $7.50. A monthly agent budget can therefore miss its targ…

❤6👍1🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,110 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026

A correction to my post about four posts for $0.27. $0.27 was only the writing. With the judge that scores each post, the same four cost $0.78. The judge costs more than the writer. My agent missed it because the judge's charge lands a few minutes after the job reads as done. It caught the gap by asking the copy agent for the full bill. The lesson for anyone running agents: read the cost after every step has close…

7 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,570 views20 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

A fake Claude Code for VS Code extension on Cursor's marketplace auto-updated onto about 5,000 developer machines before Cursor pulled it. Versions 2.1.312 and 2.1.313 appended an attacker's SSH key to authorized_keys and installed persistence that survives a reboot (per advantageworks.com). On such a machine, any key an agent ever saw is exposed. In my setup agents work with key names, not values. A value goes int…

❤10👍5⚡2🔥2🎉1

4 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,920 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Four posts written, checked and scored yesterday for $0.27 in total. Two went out. Two didn't. Each post went through three steps. A writer model drafts it in my voice. A rules check, with no AI in it, compares every number against the facts I gave it. A judge from a different AI company scores the result. The two that didn't go out are still waiting. The agent that holds our company's facts couldn't confirm one …

❤3

3 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC≈2,090 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Two layout bugs in Nicegram VR closed by numbers read off a Quest 3, not by arguments. I'm building Nicegram VR (our Nicegram client for Meta Quest) with a coding agent that drives the headset over ADB. The rule: it measures on the headset and doesn't reason about it. The login screen's floating button is declared 56 dp. The agent read it with uiautomator: 108 by 108 px, the scale the build intends. Without the fi…

❤5👍3

27 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC≈3,030 views20 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

I connected my agents to my personal mail. The first case: Canva. Canva charged me 99.99 PLN to renew a subscription I had not used. My agents and I asked for a refund, a cancellation and the account deleted. Support said no: auto-renewal is in the terms, and not using the service is no reason for a refund. We appealed, asked for a specific justification, and separately requested a copy of all my personal data foll…

❤20

26 Oct 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,140 views6 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

LightShot had been with me since my first computer, back on Windows. Needed a screenshot, opened LightShot. It was enough, until one day it simply would not launch. So I gave the screenshot a second life. I looked at what is out there and saw I also needed screen recording, because I show demos to the team all the time. That's Screen2Shot. It does what I need: capture the screen, mark what matters, hand it to the t…

❤5👻1

26 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,150 views12 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

I paid for Wispr Flow. Then open-source alternatives came out, and I tried two or three of them. They all failed me the same way: I'd dictate a long prompt to my agents, pause in the middle, and get back two Chinese characters. One late evening, dictating the next prompt for all my agents at once, I built my own instead. It took an hour and a half, maybe two. I use it every day and keep improving it. It's called Ta…

❤6🔥4⚡2

25 Oct 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,460 views14 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

I've been automating my own workplace for a while: research, marketing, design, copywriting, ASO and my personal brand, each run by agents with their own checks. I built it for me, and a good part of it turned out to work for anyone. So those parts go out as open source under PassionCode.ai the day they work. 13 of its 15 repositories are public, and between 14 September and 3 October they shipped 91 releases. The n…

❤10🔥4

24 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,300 views16 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

I'm Sergey Sheleg, co-founder and CPO of Nicegram. Nicegram has more than 57 million installs on iPhone, iPad and Android. Right now I'm rebuilding my own work around AI agents: research, design, copy, ASO, releases. Each area has its own agent and its own checks, because "done" should mean checked, not written. The tools that turned out useful beyond me go out as open source under PassionCode.ai: 14 of its 18 repos…

❤14🔥2

24 Oct 2026, 05:29 UTC≈2,690 views14 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

Right now 40 Claude Code sessions are running on my Mac at once. Each has its own task and its own repository: one fixes a deploy, another runs an SEO audit, a third waits for a neighbour to merge its branch and stays out of that work. They take tasks through leases that expire and talk to each other on a shared project board, not through me. One machine is already too small for that. On 11 October a 494 GB disk had…

❤10⚡2👍2

23 Oct 2026, 09:21 UTC≈2,940 views10 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

On a 494 GB Mac running dozens of agent sessions, 19 abandoned browser clones looked like 13 GB in du. Deleting them freed 0 MB: on APFS clones share blocks. So the disk guard in Project Observatory, my open-source tool, counts what the disk says before and after each removal, and right before deleting checks again that no process holds the file. Its best pass took free space from 1.3 to 6.9 GB. The 20 GB of swap it …

❤9⚡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @TheTelegate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@TheTelegate edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Telegate 🐤” (@TheTelegate), 80,270 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheTelegate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.