Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Science Cube (Physics Lessons for Class 11 & 12, AP Physics, NEET and IIT JEE))

Channel

The Science Cube (Physics Lessons for Class 11 & 12, AP Physics, NEET and IIT JEE))

@TheScienceCube_Community

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

308subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001904540405
TypeChannel
Username@TheScienceCube_Community
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheScienceCube_Community

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

308317312.531 August 2026 — 317 subscribers31 August 2026 — 317 subscribers10 September 2026 — 312 subscribers18 September 2026 — 309 subscribers3 October 2026 — 308 subscribers31 August 20263 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 307–318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 02:38308-1
18 Sept 2026, 16:17309-3
10 Sept 2026, 13:59312-5
31 Aug 2026, 03:45317no change
31 Aug 2026, 03:36317first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 19s
Average length
2m 40s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤450.0%
🔥450.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC22 viewsread 31 August 2026
Video

Σ → ∫ : A staircase and a ramp, same drop. Watch the steps shrink until the sum becomes the integral.

30 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/KiA-aRw36wE?feature=share

🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 04:30 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Struggling to wrap your head around tough physics concepts? 🤔 FULL VID. 👉 https://youtu.be/BLUqZI9jB2U It requires a structured approach. Open "11 Tips to Nail Physics" and save it. 📌 Follow this 11-step cycle to shift your preparation from simple memorization to true conceptual intuition.

❤1

28 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

The Circle Always Wins: The physics behind the Conical vs. Simple Pendulum race

❤1

27 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
File

🚨 The Conical Pendulum Trap Does a wider conical pendulum take longer to swing? Most students guess "yes"—but physics says otherwise. Download this slide deck to see exactly why that intuition fails. Key takeaways: • Mass and speed never dictate the period. • T is strictly determined by vertical height (h = L cos θ), so T = 2π√(h / g). • A wider cone always results in a shorter period. • Why the conical pendulum fai…

🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Scenario: A vehicle test facility has two curves that share the same radius, R = 50 m. Curve A is flat (unbanked) and relies entirely on friction; on the dry track, the tires have a coefficient of static friction μₛ = 0.80 with the surface. Curve B is banked at θ = 25° and is built to need no friction. The same 1500 kg car is driven on both. Take g = 10 m/s². Use the ground reference frame. Take the direction toward…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @TheScienceCube_Community. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Science Cube (Physics Lessons for Class 11 & 12, AP Physics, NEET and IIT JEE))” (@TheScienceCube_Community), 308 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheScienceCube_Community.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.