Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions

Channel

Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions

@TheSCOTUSFocus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,873subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001691268900
TypeChannel
Username@TheSCOTUSFocus
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheSCOTUSFocus

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,8565,8805,8687 August 2026 — 5,880 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,880 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,875 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,865 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,856 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,864 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,874 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,869 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,868 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,867 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,874 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,868 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,873 subscribers5,8737 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,852–5,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:565,873+5
15 Sept 2026, 03:015,868-6
11 Sept 2026, 17:005,874+7
6 Sept 2026, 16:385,867-1
2 Sept 2026, 06:235,868-1
30 Aug 2026, 03:175,869-5
27 Aug 2026, 04:085,874+10
24 Aug 2026, 04:445,864+8
20 Aug 2026, 13:555,856-9
17 Aug 2026, 22:035,865-10
14 Aug 2026, 17:065,875-3
11 Aug 2026, 01:435,878-2
7 Aug 2026, 13:025,880no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:595,880first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,293 reactions across 22 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍32224.9%
❤25019.3%
🤬24018.6%
🙏14211.0%
🔥1269.74%
🎉453.48%
👏372.86%
🤡332.55%
👎201.55%
🤔141.08%
🍾110.851%
🙈110.851%
🤪100.773%
🤮100.773%
😱70.541%
🤓40.309%
👀20.155%
😭20.155%
🌚10.077%
💅10.077%
5 further kinds50.387%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 22 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheSCOTUSFocus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈3,900 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

November argument sitting has been released - https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalNovember2026.pdf

🔥15💅1

10 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC≈5,470 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Important note: This application for stay has been fully briefed by both parties since Monday of last week, which means we are awaiting any day now for the Supreme Court to render a decision on whether they will intervene or not.

🙏48🔥4🤔3🤡3

4 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC≈5,840 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

OCTOBER 2026 - The Supreme Court has officially released its calendar for the first month sitting of the 2026-2027 term. Find the cases in the link below. (More details will come out soon regarding November and December) Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalOctober2026.pdf

👍28❤8

27 Jul 2026, 21:54 UTC≈19,400 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026

JUST IN - President Trump has officially asked the Supreme Court to allow the USPS to change mail in voting criteria. The administrative stay request will be handled by Justice Jackson, who will likely refer it to the full court for consideration. Here is the link to the docket: https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\26a124.html

👏37🙏17👎9❤4👍2

13 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC≈8,900 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Tomorrow, Justice Kagan and Justice Barrett will appear before Capitol Hill to provide testimony concerning additional security funding. This event will mark the first occasion since 2019 that a sitting Justice has testified before the House Appropriations Committee to present annual budget requests.

❤39🤔11🤓4🤮3🔥2

6 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC≈24,600 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce its age-verification law during litigation. There are no noted dissents.

👍53🎉23🤡5🤮2

30 Jun 2026, 21:16 UTC≈7,740 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

FAQ: Why does the Supreme Court always release its controversial decisions in June? Believe it or not, it is actually unintentional. The justices, along with their law clerks, work tirelessly to ensure that cases are decided smoothly without any disruptions. Typically, the more controversial a case is, the more it requires deeper consideration from the justices drafting the majority opinions to ensure sufficient sup…

❤29👍11🤪10🤮5

30 Jun 2026, 17:09 UTC≈7,840 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN - Supreme Court grants review in new cases for this fall, including major second amendment cases involving whether an individual has the second amendment right to an AR-15 style rifle. This is a challenge to an “assault weapon” ban in Illinois.

🔥48👍8❤1

30 Jun 2026, 15:15 UTC≈13,400 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026

We are aware of the NPR article claiming Justice Alito has retired, at this time, the Supreme Court’s Public Information Office has confirmed that the story is inaccurate, and thus NPR has retracted it.

👍59🤡17🔥11😭2❤1😍1

30 Jun 2026, 14:44 UTC≈6,140 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026

That concludes our coverage of the opinions of the 2025-2026 Supreme Court term. Thank you to everyone who joined us throughout this incredible journey. Not to worry, though, the Supreme Court may be entering its summer recess, but we all know that the cases will be piling up and emergency orders will likely be issued throughout the summer. So with that, while we try to enjoy our summer recess as well, we will be her…

❤30🤬17🙏10👍5😢1

30 Jun 2026, 14:38 UTC≈6,160 views140 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Here is the third and final decision of the term from the Supreme Court. Case - Trump v. Barbara Authored by - Chief Justice Roberts Joined by - Justice Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett and Jackson. Justice Kavanaugh concurred in part and dissented in part. Holding - Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or tem- porarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens a…

🤬112🙈11😱7🤡6❤4

30 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTC≈4,590 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Here is the second opinion of the day from the Supreme Court. Case - NRSC v. FEC Authored by - Justice Kavanaugh Joined by - Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett Holding - FECA’s political-party coordinated-expenditure limits violate the First Amendment. Dissent - Justice Kagan, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson. Link to opinion - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion…

❤27👍15🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @TheSCOTUSFocus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Patriots Rising
@PatriotsRising1 · 31,499
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 September 2026
Patriot Princess 777
@patriot_princess · 39,534
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions” (@TheSCOTUSFocus), 5,873 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheSCOTUSFocus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.