Channel
@ThePeepTimes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,049subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001214086875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThePeepTimes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThePeepTimes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 7,049 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 7,056 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 7,067 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 7,066 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 7,066 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
48 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 58.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 16.7% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 10.4% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 4 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Death is the great raw zipper of the colossal mind-grid unfastening the heavy winter coat of your name— Not a void, not a ditch, but the supreme jazz-collapse into the un-born, un-died, smoke-looping sky-juice of the Big It! No tracks, no ticket, no conductor, just the holy, wild, un-fenced spook-radiance of the grand Nowhere. The ultimate drop-out! Where the ego-engine conks out and you wake up as the entire sky-the…
❤2👍1
It wasn’t deep, it wasn’t forever But it felt like the whole world buffered Every time u looked my way We talked in half sentences and emojis Laughed at jokes that weren’t even funny And I called it nothing just to sound cool But my chest didn’t get the memo Cause every seen hit different Every wwy felt like a plot twist First love hits like that tho Messy, fast, kinda stupid And somehow u never forget the lag it …
❤4
Give reviews on the other writer's posts using #yourreview, who were invited you to review his/her post by giving #review hashtag. 🔗 View | ✨𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗧✨ 🔥 @tgWiz
👍1
The Fragrance of Moments Life’s beauty isn't measured by how long we stay, In the bonds we forge or the words we say. Stability is but a shadow, a fleeting glass, As seasons change and the years must pass. The true essence lies in the golden light, Of those shared moments, pure and bright. Before the paths diverged and hands let go, In the warmth of the soul’s unspoken glow. It’s the laughter shared, the silence und…
❤2
> Mushroom Vulture: Do you believe in magic? > Shinobi: Huh? > Mushroom Vulture: Have you seen Goncharov? > Shinobi: Umm... no? > Mushroom Vulture: An entire movie dreamt up by Tumblr, a collective fever dream turned into reality, one that spans mediums, crosses borders, and transcends language. And one of the best Mafia movies ever, no less. This is the power of meme magic. Once people start talking about something,…
❤2🤣1
#review @WrytBot 🔗 View | ✨𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗧✨ 🔥 More on @tgWiz
🔥1
Crow cries at noon Sun split in two Smoke walking barefoot Through the avenue A crown of feathers Nailed to the sky Drums in the marrow Won’t let me die I left my name In a jar of salt Traded my shadow For thunderbolt Mother of ivy Swallowed the well Spat out a staircase Spiraling hell Down in the cellar Of bone and seed Priests of the mushroom Whispered the creed Forget your face Forget your skin Peel off the hour Y…
❤2
I stare into the bottomless pitch dark My fears writhing like snakes in my stomach And even though there seems to be no horizon in sight I imagine seeing mountains in the distance Willing for the sun to rise I look at glowing clouds And though they seems to be glowing with dark I tell myself they are waiting for sun to come out It's an endless road and freezing cold And all the warmth I have is the dream of a home So…
❤4👍1
"Black holes" I’ve been looking for a hole in this void, From where something could seep in. It could be pain or joy, it doesn’t matter As long as it made me feel like a human. I see the moments pass A camera vision, a papery feel The truth and lie blend into one As everything turns into grains of sand. How do I pour void into words? Turn black holes into light. How do I put soul in the dead? When the living have …
👍3❤2
Hey everyone — quick question 😊 Do you feel like storytelling today is still mostly stuck in the same old formats (just text, just books, just screens)? I’ve been thinking a lot about how stories could become more collaborative and immersive — involving writers, illustrators, sound designers, maybe even 3D artists someday. Curious to know what you all think: 👉 How do you imagine the future of storytelling? #review #n…
🎉4
ThePeepTimes pinned «Dear friends across our vibrant community 🌎 Wishing you all a joyful, peaceful, and inspiring New Year! 🎉🍾 As we step into 2026, let’s take a moment to celebrate the incredible journey we’ve shared. Over the years, our network of channels and groups has…»
Dear friends across our vibrant community 🌎 Wishing you all a joyful, peaceful, and inspiring New Year! 🎉🍾 As we step into 2026, let’s take a moment to celebrate the incredible journey we’ve shared. Over the years, our network of channels and groups has blossomed into a beautiful tapestry of voices, ideas, creativity, and connection. Whether through poetry, conversations, knowledge-sharing, or simple moments of lau…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThePeepTimes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 278,660 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ThePeepTimes” (@ThePeepTimes), 7,049 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThePeepTimes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.