Channel
@TheOliverStone
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002756236897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheOliverStone |
| Description | Award-winning director, producer, screenwriter. JFK Revisited, Snowden, Savages, Untold History, Platoon, Wall Street, JFK. Chasing the Light available now. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 19 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheOliverStone |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 3 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 3 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The War on Oliver Stone’s #JFKRecordsAct: In light of all the horrors that are befalling America right now, the autopsy is below on the JFK Records Act, written by Andrew Iler and Mark Adamczyk, two experts in this matter. Introduction follows, but please read Part 1: The Opening Salvo Against Oliver Stone’s Film “JFK” for the perspective needed. Thank you. I wish you a harmonious Easter at this time. kennedysandki…
To those attacking #JFK for not covering Israel's connection to President Kennedy: my position hasn't changed. Producer Arnon Milchan had no creative input on JFK. He was brought in by Warner Bros. for financing, rarely visited the set, and we never discussed his background. The Dimona nuclear theory only came to my attention after the film's release, and I remain unconvinced. In my view, JFK had more than enough pow…
(2/2) 4. #ThePlayer (1992) is another ‘90s juicy gem from a twisty screenplay by Michael Tolkin. Robert Altman directs with a cool distance, as witty and ironic as he was when working with a great screenplay like “Gosford Park” (2001) by Julian Fellowes. An artful screenplay makes a big difference with Altman. When he doesn’t have one, it hurts. Notably, the studio’s creative executive is perfectly played by Tim Rob…
Photo, posted without a caption
(1/2) Fears of wars and pessimism about Mr. Trump’s course have driven me back to the movies for solace. Some recent viewings: 1. #F1 (Formula 1) (2025) is a perfectly designed vehicle (not one hair out of place) from producer Jerry Bruckheimer, director Joseph Kosinski, and screenwriter Ehren Kruger for Brad Pitt; he’s so right for this from the flinty, American Midwest character he played in “Inglourious Basterds”…
He captures the bright promise Clinton exuded, like Ronald Reagan, but, at the same time, captures the lie that goes along at the heart of the optimism. It’s thus a highly ambivalent film, liking and, at the same time, judging Clinton for his faults. He wasn’t a great president in the end and made huge mistakes, among them allowing NATO to expand eastward, which brought us the Ukraine War. However, in the context of …
Photo, posted without a caption
In 2008, our movie “W.” dramatized a scene of our leaders (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice) deciding to attack Iraq. In a core moment, Cheney discusses #Iran as the ultimate “prize.” It applies today as we embark on another potential disaster, now led by #Netanyahu and @realDonaldTrump. Why? What’s happened to our country? It’s not one President or another – it’s in our blood to want to dominate. youtube.com/wa…
A great new book from #EdCurtin linked below. A sumptuous writer and one of the finest thinkers and essayists I’ve read, Curtin sees our confusing world with compassionate clarity and profound wisdom. https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Found-Political-Dispatches-Resistance/dp/196389216X
Below is the first 30 minutes of my interview Tuesday with @KatieHalperShow on the JFK case. With me is Jim DiEugenio, researcher and associate. youtube.com/live/KoO5I0IYa… Second half of the 60-minute interview will be up next week. I’ve also enclosed, for the record, my opening statement(18:22) on YouTube for the House hearing on the #JFKFiles from April 1st. Jim DiEugenio’s (27:33) and Jefferson Morley’s (11:52…
Communicating openly through our screens can be really enlightening, but those people who prefer insulting or just hating another for political or whatever reasons ruin the experience. In my case, I keep hearing from the haters the word “old” thrown my way, i.e. – “You’re just old and over the hill and washed up” or “I’m unfollowing you” or “You voted for Trump, you should be ashamed” or “How much is Putin paying you…
Clinton – those who think our role in the world is to dominate it and impede or hurt any other country that’s seeking prosperity for its citizenry and contributing to this world with new technology, etc. – and that includes China, Russia, and Iran, who, I keep repeating like a frustrated schoolmaster, are not our natural enemies. Reexamine your prejudices and deepen your history. I will always fight for peace and und…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @TheOliverStone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 986,816 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TheOliverStone named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Oliver Stone” (@TheOliverStone), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheOliverStone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.