Channel
@TheNestLegal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
132subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001428190368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheNestLegal |
| Description | Очаровательный pêle-mêle (юридические курьезы и не только) ___________________________________ TG-канал независимого портала The NEST для обсуждения актуальных вопросов в сфере юриспруденции http://thenest.legal |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheNestLegal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 132 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 132 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
115 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 50.4% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 11.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 8.70% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 7.83% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.48% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Искусственный интеллект против профессоров юридических вузов: новые перспективы? Недавно было опубликовано интересное исследование Преподаватели из 14 американских юридических школ оценивали ответы на типовые вопросы первокурсников по контрактному праву, сравнивая ответы, составленные коллегами, с ответами нейросетей Google Gemini 2.5 Pro и NotebookLM Статистика впечатляет: • В 75% случаев профессора выбирали отве…
❤5😍4😁2🤓1
Channel name was changed to «the nest.legal»
Channel name was changed to «the nest»
Channel photo updated
Channel photo removed
Планировали опубликовать более подробный пост о Баскиа и использовании нотариальной/юридической символики в его творчестве … но пост подождет следующей недели, поскольку сегодня не терпится поделиться другой информацией. Юридическая фирма Legora наняла Джуда Лоу (напомним, его фамилия в оригинале Law, что дословно переводится как право / закон) для рекламы их услуг. Лозунг рекламной кампании - «теперь закон (он же …
❤7👍1
Сегодня на аукционе в Париже будет выставлена работа Жана-Мишеля Баскиа “Law Offices - Notary Public” (или «Нотариальная контора») 1981 г. Оценочная стоимость - от 1 млн до 1,5 млн евро. Участвуем, коллеги? ☺️
🤔8❤4🌚1
Андрей Голованёв, опытный юрист, талантливый преподаватель и давний друг The NEST, рассказывает об обучении в одной из старейших кузниц юристов Европы - Болонском университете. Эксклюзивно на The NEST
❤8👍4🔥3
Тем временем, мы возвращаемся из вынужденного отпуска в сомнительно работающий телеграм Из новостей: в сувенирной магазине при парижском Конституционном суде чудесные слюнявчики - лозунги с правами человека Дальше - больше контента (и не только о товарах)
❤12👍1
Искусственный интеллект и адвокатская тайна: друзья или враги? Суд Южного округа Нью-Йорка, как минимум, не видит дружбы в этих отношениях. В феврале он постановил, что предоставление в программу с искусственным интеллектом информации, составляющей адвокатскую тайну, влечет потерю статуса адвокатской тайны. Во-первых, ИИ-программа не является дипломированным юристом. Во - вторых, информация, которая в нее загружаетс…
❤🔥8👍2
Прогнозирование инфляции посредством использования искусственного интеллекта? Не будущее, а настоящее! Подробнее читаем в новой статье о современных тенденциях эконометрики в долгожданной новой статье на The NEST:
❤6👍1🔥1😱1
Чтение на выходные, друзья! Если вы (как и я) не знали, то «ималогия» - дисциплина, занимающаяся изучением визуальных образов. Что - то новенькое в ноябрьскую пору.
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TheNestLegal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что хотел выразить Бэнкси своим новым граффити?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 4 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“the nest.legal” (@TheNestLegal), 132 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheNestLegal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.