Channel
@TheMarkCrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001547966887 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheMarkCrypto |
| Description | Крипто канал, тут будут всякие таполки, новости о листинге и тд Кратко говоря помогу заработать) |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheMarkCrypto |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 36 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2024 to 8 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MARKBOOST — лучшее продвижение в Telegram! 👥 Подписчики | 👀 Просмотры | 💬 Реакции | 🚫 Жалобы 🔜 Качество — топ 🔜 Запуск — моментально 🔜 Оплата — в звёздах ⭐️или гривнах 💳 📱 Подберу нужную накрутку — прайс в канале: 👉 @TagirStars MARKBOOST — ты продвигаешься, я делаю результат.
❤1
Т.к заморозили прошлый акк, обращаться сюда @MarkTagirovich
Беру в аренду ЛК банков / бирж 🔥 💳 Интересуют ЛК: ФриБанк 18+ ПУМБ (особо ценю со связкой) О Банк Глобал Плюс + Аккорд БВР Райффайзен Izzi Ощад А-Банк 💰 Биржи: Bybit BingX Bitget KuCoin MEXC Binance OKX 📈 Цены: Банковские ЛК — 1000–1200 грн ПУМБ + Биржа в связке — до 2000 грн Писать в лс Без чернухи, чисто p2p
Кто с Украины, пишите @marktagirovich покупаю банки
🤔1
Мне кажется, все хотят подзаработать звёзд! Я нашёл бота, который даёт звёзды за выполнение заданий. Чекайте! ⭐️🚀 http://t.me/StarsovEarnBot/
❤1🔥1
🤑 Критерии для дропа в BLUM - Blum Points - Meme Points - Выполнение заданий и квестов в секции Earn - Игра Drop Game - Приглашение друзей - Proof of activity - Daily Streaks - И другое
👍4
Листинг Paws будет нескоро 😁 Разрабы продолжают добавлять новые задания, хотя снепшот уже был сделан. Но задания в этот раз простые — достаточно перейти по ним, вернуться назад, и их засчитает. Забрать +10 000 PAWS - ТЫК 👈 https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot Как думаете, дождемся листинг PAWS в этом месяце или нет?)
🪙 Что будет дальше в MAJOR? Разработчики пообещали сжечь 1 300 000 $MAJOR, сэкономленных после AirDrop. Это произойдет уже в этом месяце, что значительно сократит общее предложение токенов. Также Major планирует откупать свой токен. После последней обновы – Telegram Stars, заработанные за наши транзакции, будут направлены на выкуп. Сколько бы разрабы не старались, но токен продолжает лететь на дно 👀
Начинаю плотно фармить CatTea 🔝 это проект от Catizen Что нужно делать? Переходим в @CatTea 👈 Играем, лутаем токены, а также выполняем задания и зовём друзей. Тут 75% саплая выделено на AirDrop, соответственно насыпка будет вкусная! Я топлю за этот проект, так как Catizen уже покормили всех ранее.
🐾 Свежие апдейты по PAWS Наш баланс на счету не равен количеству токенов! Будет расчёт на основе следующих критериев: ▪️Количество выполненных задач; ▪️Участие в проектах с дорожной карты PAWS (непонятный пункт); ▪️ Количество активных рефералов; ▪️ Медали от голосования и другое... Когда ждать листинг PAWS? Проект PAWS переходит в новую фазу подготовки к TGE. Этот процесс требует времени, потому что мы хотим убеди…
👏1
❗️Вы можете потерять дроп в PAWS Если вы не заберете свои токены у Гринча, дроп будет потерян навсегда! Уже через несколько дней состоится снимок балансов. Обязательно заберите свои токены до снимка, если еще не сделали этого ранее. Залетаем в PAWS по ссылке 👈
🤑 Тыкать DOGS не забываем Напоминаю, что нужно просто заходить каждый день в DOGS и прожимать кнопку с иконкой дня. Сегодня уже 10-й день активности, который выделяется, как и первый. Отмечаем 15 день в @DOGS 👈
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheMarkCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 774,910 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TheMarkCrypto named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO • TheMark” (@TheMarkCrypto), 36 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheMarkCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.