Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for زاپاس جقی گیمرز - کاسپلی تل - جویسی آرت - اونلی تل

Channel

زاپاس جقی گیمرز - کاسپلی تل - جویسی آرت - اونلی تل

@TheJuicyarts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,702subscribers

+161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001281602471
TypeChannel
Username@TheJuicyarts
Description@CAP_KENWAY ایدی ادمین 📸
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 26 June 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheJuicyarts

Growth

10,53010,70210,6167 August 2026 — 10,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,541 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,530 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,622 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,653 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,649 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,670 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,702 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,504–10,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:3410,702+32
13 Aug 2026, 07:0710,670+21
12 Aug 2026, 04:5610,649-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:4210,653+31
9 Aug 2026, 10:0210,622+92
8 Aug 2026, 07:1110,530-11
7 Aug 2026, 13:0110,541no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:5310,541first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
200.0%
avg views ÷ 10,702 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,400
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.285%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 201923 July 2026)
Views total21,400
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Videos
1
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

476 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33670.6%
🥰398.19%
🔥316.51%
👎214.41%
💋183.78%
👏91.89%
🆒81.68%
💅61.26%
👍40.84%
🤮40.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 476reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2019 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheJuicyarts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2019 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC≈21,400 views61 reactionsread 15 August 2026

باه باه داشته باشید 🔞 🔤 @KateKurayOficial 🔤 ᴏɴʟʏ ꜰᴀɴꜱ & ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴀɴʏ 🔤 𝕲𝖆𝖒𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖋𝖚𝖓𝖓𝖞

29💋18🆒8💅6

19 Dec 2025, 08:34 UTC≈108,000 views148 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026

چنل هامون رو دارید دیگه .... ؟ 🦆 @JaponiKhareji 😈 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐅𝐀𝐍𝐙 😎

102🥰24👎15👏7

20 May 2025, 10:55 UTC≈280,000 views149 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

📌 مجموعه ی جویسی آرت تقدیم می کند 🌟❤️ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🔞 😬 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ کاسپلی تل 🦴 @CosplayTeleg 💕 💙 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🥵 جقی گیمرز @JeghiGamerss 🎮 @JeghiGamersPosts 🎮 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ❤️ اونلی تل ⛓ @Cosplay2026 ⛓ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ® @Gamesw اخبار و فان گیمینگ ® @GamersChatTel ® گروه های چتمون ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ این لیست به روز رسانی می شود - حاوی پست های اونلی و کمپانی های مختلف ❤️

104🔥20🥰13👎6🤮4👍1👏1

19 May 2025, 21:17 UTC≈173,000 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

چنل کاسپلی تل سابق فیلتر ‌شد ✅ آدرس جدید : @VALDO_0fficial ♥ مرسی 🤘🏿

15🔥2

4 Dec 2024, 17:00 UTC≈266,000 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://t.me/NotCensure چنل دانلود بازی های اندروید ✅

13🔥2

13 Nov 2024, 06:30 UTC≈267,000 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

چنل هامون فعالند ❤️ نهایت استفاده رو ببرید تماما اونلی های با کیفیت و به روز 💜

11

7 Oct 2024, 13:55 UTC≈267,000 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

چنل پست های جقی گیم فیل شد و ایدی جدید قرار گرفت 🦋

5

9 Sept 2024, 11:33 UTC≈261,000 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

پست ها رو می تونید از این چنل ها دانلود کنید 💜 در صورت فیلتری همینجا اطلاع رسانی خواهیم کرد ماچ ❤️

10

4 Aug 2024, 13:07 UTC≈278,000 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

تبلیغات ⬅️ @baner_C_D_R پست های چنل جقی گیمرز ⬇️ @jeghiGamersFick پست های چنل کاسپلی تل ⬇ @CosplayTeleg پست های چنل اونلی تلگرام 👇🏻 @

7🔥1

25 May 2024, 09:03 UTC≈268,000 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

یکی از چنل هامون فیل شد 🙅‍♂ اینجا ادامه میدیم 👇🏻 https://t.me/+pVMpS5Rtt_A3Nzg0

12

24 Feb 2024, 17:02 UTCviews —

زاپاس جقی گیمرز - کاسپلی تل - جویسی آرت - اونلی تل pinned «جهت تبلیغات در کانال های : Juicy Art 👨‍🎨 🏠 Gαмєяѕ Hσмє ❤️💋 jegнι Gʌɱєɾƨ 🕹💦 💭🪫 فروش سرور اختصاصی 📲 و گروه های : ☆ Noob Gamers ☆ 🎬 Wᴇ Aʀᴇ Mᴏᴠɪᴇʀ 🎮 weAreGamersGp 💞Oᴛᴀᴋᴜ Fʀɪᴇɴᴅs 🌟🌙 ⚜️ گروه فروش فیلتر شکن 🔰 گروه درسی و چت آزاد پیروان علم📖🕯 ⚡️گپ خانوادگی…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheJuicyarts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 256,394 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“زاپاس جقی گیمرز - کاسپلی تل - جویسی آرت - اونلی تل” (@TheJuicyarts), 10,702 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheJuicyarts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.