Channel
@TheGridbroker
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
944subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001068956307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheGridbroker |
| Description | ارتباط با ما: https:/t.me/drarabsadegh |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheGridbroker |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 944 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 944 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,805 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎥 چوب سیاستهای انرژی لای چرخ بخشخصوصی واقعی 🔹مهدی عربصادق، کارشناس حوزه برق، معتقد است آنچه امروز در صنعت برق کشور جریان دارد ناترازی نیست، بلکه یک بحران ناشی از سیاستگذاریهای نادرست است. 🔹حمایت از نیروگاههای رانتی، تضعیف بخشخصوصی واقعی، واگذاری گسترده زمین برای نیروگاههای خورشیدی بدون ارزیابی کافی و تداوم تصدیگری دولت، از مهمترین عواملی است که فضای کسبوکار و اقتصاد انرژی را با چالشهای جدی روبهرو کرده …
♨️♨️تنگه هرمز جایگزین پذیر است؟ مهدی عرب صادق کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در گفتوگو با رسانه تصویری «آن»: 🔸جایگزینهایی برای تنگه هرمز وجود دارد، اما ساخت آنها به زمان و هزینه سنگین نیاز دارد؛ در بازار انرژی، آنچه بیش از همه ارزش دارد، امنیت و اعتماد در رساندن انرژی از تولیدکننده به مصرفکننده است. #تیتر_اول یوتیوب | اینستاگرام | سایت 🔸@ONnewsmedia
♨️♨️هرمز را شطرنجی مدیریت کنیم نه با قواعد پوکر روسیه مهدی عرب صادق کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در گفتوگو با رسانه تصویری «آن»: 🔸مدیریت تنگه هرمز باید با حفظ نقش راهبردی ایران و تضمین امنیت عبور انجام شود؛ نه با تصمیمهایی که ارزش ژئوپلیتیک کشور را کاهش دهد و ایران را به کارت بازی قدرتهای بزرگ تبدیل کند. #تیتر_اول یوتیوب | اینستاگرام | سایت 🔸@ONnewsmedia
♨️♨️دیپلماسی انرژی کشور قرن بیستمی است مهدی عرب صادق کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در گفتوگو با رسانه تصویری «آن»: 🔸دیپلماسی انرژی فقط فروش نفت نیست؛ اگر مسیرهای ترانزیت انرژی را ناامن کنیم، حتی برای تنگه هرمز هم دیر یا زود مسیرهای جایگزین ایجاد خواهد شد. #تیتر_اول یوتیوب | اینستاگرام | سایت 🔸@ONnewsmedia
♨️♨️- ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 📺 بررسی و تحلیل اخبار روز جهان از رسانه تصویری آن 🎙مجری: ایمان موسوی 👥 مهمان برنامه: مهدی عرب صادق (کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی) 📅 ۱۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ مشاهده کامل
خاموشی به مردم برای رانت خواص ✍مهدی عرب صادق در توییتینوشت: آقای اژهای @ejei_org! بالاخره یکی باید محاکمه شود! یا بنده اگر خلاف نوشتم یا آنها اگر خیانت کردند! «بارها هشدار دادم! ظاهرا برخی هیچ دغدغه ای نسبت به فروپاشی کشور ندارند!» ژست توسعه بدون زیرساخت، نتیجهای جز فروپاشی ندارد! این ولع برای صدور مجوز و خرید خارجی در سازمان ساتبا برای چیست؟! امروز در یک نمونه تلخ و فاجعهبار ۲۰۰ مگاوات در پایتخت کشور خاموش می…
🟡عربصادق کارشناس انرژی: با تداوم این شرایط تا ۵۰ روز دیگر قیمت نفت به ۱۷۰ دلار میرسد! @Black_Booox
🎥#همشهریTV|پیشبینی جنجالی کارشناس انرژی: قیمت نفت به ۱۷۰ دلار خواهد رسید! 🔹مهدی عرب صادق، کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در تلویزیون همشهری @HamshahriNews
🔴#همشهریTV|اگر تنگه هرمز ۳ ماه بسته بماند، چه بلایی سر اقتصاد جهان میآید؟ ⚪️مهدی عرب صادق، کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در تلویزیون همشهری @Hamshahri_TV
🔴#همشهریTV|چرا با وجود منابع نفت و گاز، هاب انرژی دنیا نشدیم؟ ⚪️مهدی عرب صادق، کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در تلویزیون همشهری @Hamshahri_TV
🔴#همشهریTV|گاو شیرده دنیا عربستان نیست؛ آمریکاست! ⚪️مهدی عرب صادق، کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در تلویزیون همشهری @Hamshahri_TV
🔴#همشهریTV|چرا حفظ کنترل هرمز از خودِ مذاکره مهمتر است؟ ⚪️مهدی عرب صادق، کارشناس دیپلماسی انرژی در تلویزیون همشهری @Hamshahri_TV
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheGridbroker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 508,229 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TheGridbroker named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دیپلماسی انرژی” (@TheGridbroker), 944 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheGridbroker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.