Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TheFreeHumanBeingProject

@TheFreeHumanBeingProject

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,246subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232718898
TypeChannel
Username@TheFreeHumanBeingProject
Created12 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheFreeHumanBeingProject

Growth

1,2461,2521,2497 August 2026 — 1,252 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,252 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,246 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,245–1,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:161,246-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:441,250-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:001,252no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:591,252first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1935.8%
🔥1528.3%
917.0%
😁815.1%
🤬23.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 1 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2025, 16:58 UTC668 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClashReportVideo

Marco Rubio officially declares that individuals who criticize Israel will be denied entry visas to the United States.

🤬21

Signed Aaron Zumpf

1 Jun 2025, 16:55 UTC647 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClashReportPhoto

Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans Trump administration is quietly expanding federal data-sharing efforts, enlisting Palantir—a firm founded by billionaire Peter Thiel—to link agency databases. Critics warn this could lead to mass surveillance of Americans. Palantir has secured over $113 million in contracts since 2017 and just landed a $795 million DOD deal. Its data tools are already in use at DHS,

2

Signed Aaron Zumpf

10 May 2025, 01:43 UTC≈4,950 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥6👍2

Signed Danny Bristow

29 Apr 2025, 04:25 UTC587 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Danny Bristow

29 Apr 2025, 00:27 UTC350 viewsread 7 August 2026

World Economic Forum is comparing a Cyber Attack to Covid! https://youtu.be/-0oZA1B3ooI?si=E7_HpTcJbW101BGj

Signed Danny Bristow

26 Apr 2025, 16:22 UTC≈5,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Danny Bristow

23 Apr 2025, 02:40 UTC375 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Colorado is insane. Democrats hate parents. Kids are being harmed right and left. Please send help. 🆘🆘🆘🆘🆘 Erin for Parental Rights

Signed Danny Bristow

22 Apr 2025, 15:14 UTC313 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

“If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour... you're gonna see some serious shit.” - Dr. Emmett Brown

1

Signed Danny Bristow

20 Apr 2025, 05:58 UTC284 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AWIASW

We knew this but it's still good to see numbers. - “The first takeaway is, assuming our count is complete, that armed citizens have stopped more active shooter incidents than the police have, although the difference is not significantly different from zero,” Lott and Moody noted. “Also, armed citizens do not appear to interfere with the police or blunder so badly as to get their weapon taken away by the shooter or k

2👍2🔥2

Signed Aaron Zumpf

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TheFreeHumanBeingProject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 982,507 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TheFreeHumanBeingProject” (@TheFreeHumanBeingProject), 1,246 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheFreeHumanBeingProject.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.