Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 97 days, net -217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,938–10,319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 02:59
9,982
-16
8 Nov 2026, 14:16
9,998
-4
7 Nov 2026, 10:19
10,002
-9
6 Nov 2026, 11:26
10,011
-5
5 Nov 2026, 11:36
10,016
-8
4 Nov 2026, 08:05
10,024
-2
3 Nov 2026, 10:28
10,026
-5
2 Nov 2026, 08:10
10,031
-2
1 Nov 2026, 08:55
10,033
-5
31 Oct 2026, 05:50
10,038
-4
30 Oct 2026, 04:40
10,042
-12
29 Oct 2026, 08:09
10,054
+1
28 Oct 2026, 06:45
10,053
-3
27 Oct 2026, 07:58
10,056
-7
25 Oct 2026, 06:59
10,063
-1
24 Oct 2026, 03:40
10,064
+1
22 Oct 2026, 04:59
10,063
-6
20 Oct 2026, 00:35
10,069
-1
18 Oct 2026, 22:05
10,070
-1
17 Oct 2026, 21:06
10,071
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 9,982 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
54 (23 March 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
5,811
Reactions total
78
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 23:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,721 reactions across 54 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,154
67.1%
👍
225
13.1%
👏
65
3.78%
🔥
50
2.91%
💯
47
2.73%
😢
44
2.56%
😁
38
2.21%
💔
25
1.45%
🤔
24
1.39%
🥰
9
0.523%
🤷♀
8
0.465%
😭
6
0.349%
⚡
5
0.291%
😨
5
0.291%
🤡
4
0.232%
❤🔥
3
0.174%
🗿
3
0.174%
🏆
2
0.116%
🆒
1
0.058%
🕊
1
0.058%
2 further kinds
2
0.116%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,721 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 54 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheDeepQuote. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
I have fought a thousand battles but Im still standing. I have cried a thousand tears but im still smiling. I have been betrayed and rejected but I still walk proud I smile, I laugh, I love hard. Im humble I am beautiful Im real. I am me.
''Your trauma made you stronger''
No, my trauma made me traumatized, it made me weak, gave me sleepless nights and memory loss. It gave me feelings I've never wanted. I made myself stronger by dragging myself out of a dark place and dealing with consequences that weren't my fault.
The heart was made to be broken. Time and time again, it shatters into pieces that can never fully be put back together. Each break leaves a scar, a reminder that no matter how much you try to shield yourself, pain finds a way in. It's inescapable, and you’re left to carry the fragments of what was once whole, wondering if love is nothing more than the prelude to inevitable suffering.
Deep Quotes☑
THE DAY YOU MOVE ON
One day, you'll hear their name and feel nothing heavy. You'll see an old picture and simply remember. You'll pass places you once shared without wanting to return. That day won't arrive with an announcement. It will happen quietly, somewhere between ordinary moments, when you realize your heart finally belongs to the present.
Deep Quotes☑
YOU WERE NOT TOO MUCH
You weren't too emotional for wanting reassurance. You weren't too needy for wanting consistency. You weren't asking for too much by wanting honesty. Maybe you were simply asking the wrong person. The right connection won't make basic emotional needs feel like burdens. Never shrink yourself just to fit someone's limited capacity to love.
Deep Quotes☑
YOU WILL FEEL AGAIN
After heartbreak, you may think your heart has become permanently numb. You stop getting excited, trusting easily, or imagining a future with anyone. But numbness is often protection, not your final identity. Give yourself time. One day, something small will make you smile again, and you'll realize your heart was healing quietly.
Deep Quotes☑
THE LOVE THAT ENDS
Not every love story ends because someone was bad. Sometimes, two people care deeply but cannot give each other what they need. Timing changes. Priorities shift. People grow in different directions. That kind of ending still hurts, but accepting it can be kinder than forcing something beautiful to survive where it no longer belongs.
Deep Quotes☑
EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION
There is a kind of exhaustion that sleep cannot fix. It comes from constantly wondering where you stand, whether you're enough, and what someone's silence means. Eventually, you stop trying to decode every feeling. You realize peace begins when you stop making yourself responsible for emotions and decisions that belong to someone else.
Deep Quotes☑
WHEN THEY COME BACK
Sometimes, people return after you've learned to live without them. They bring familiar words and memories that make your heart hesitate. But missing someone isn't always a reason to reopen the door. Ask yourself whether they've changed or simply become lonely. Your healing deserves more than a temporary return from someone who left.
Deep Quotes☑
LETTING GO
Letting go doesn't mean you suddenly stopped caring. It means you finally accepted that caring alone cannot keep something alive. You can love someone and still choose distance. You can remember the good and still acknowledge the damage. Sometimes, moving forward means respecting what happened without allowing it to define what happens next.
Deep Quotes☑
This is one of the biggest differences between people: some optimize for comfort, others deliberately choose harder problems. Years later, the gap becomes huge.
Original post by Owner 1win
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @TheDeepQuote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @TheDeepQuote as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Deep Quotes” (@TheDeepQuote), 9,982 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheDeepQuote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.