Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TheBeakerLady

@TheBeakerGirl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,341subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786821343
TypeChannel
Username@TheBeakerGirl
Created5 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheBeakerGirl

Growth

1,3411,3461,343.56 August 2026 — 1,346 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,346 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,341 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,340–1,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:141,341-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:311,344-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:021,346no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:211,346first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
111.8%
avg views ÷ 1,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held10 (16 April 202620 July 2026)
Views total4,499
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 02:26 UTC≈1,050 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

This informative chart by Guus Kroonen et al. illustrates how several agricultural terms underwent semantic shifts during different stages of early Indo-European development. Something that stands out is that these roots originally had broader meanings in Basal Indo-European (also known as Proto-Indo-Anatolian), such as “crush,” “scatter,” “field,” or “granule”. Field, for example, is a vague term that could have ref

19 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,810 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Artistic Reconstruction of a Yamnaya man by AncientEuropeans2. Shared with permission. Source Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/Da4eTMJDOYs/

16 Jul 2026, 03:46 UTC≈639 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Image of artifacts of the Abashevo culture. Abashevo was a descendant of the Fatyanovo–Balanovo culture with influences from the Yamnaya derived Poltavka culture. They are the ancestors of the Srubnaya and the Sintashta. Image Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Treasure_-_Abashevo_culture_-_The_Museum_of_History_and_Archeology_of_the_Urals.jpg Image description translated from Russian: “Verkhne-Kyzilovsky

26 Jun 2026, 03:12 UTC≈928 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

German Corded Ware burial Photo by Dguendel (licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). Link to original photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Egeln,_die_Wasserburg,_Museum,_schnurkeramisches_Hockergrab.jpg

23 May 2026, 22:58 UTC≈1,810 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Artistic reconstruction of a man from the Abashevo culture. This was a redo of a past work. There were some artistic liberties taken on his headband and neck ring. The headband was inspired by a Russian anthropological bust of this same skull. While the neck ring was based on some research I found about torc like artifacts from Abashevo. Unfortunately Ido not have phenotype data on Abashevo so I choose pigmentation t

10 May 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,120 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

An example of the Beaker Type (Flat Occiput and tall head)

6 May 2026, 19:33 UTC≈1,310 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Facial reconstruction of a 5,200-year-old Yamnaya man from Volgograd region I. V. Sinitsyn excavated a large kurgan containing 25 burials from different cultures; of these, two belonged to the Yamnaya culture. Burial 22 (the reconstructed individual) was likely the main one. Based on the grave construction, burial rite, and the form and decoration of a vessel, Sinitsyn considered burial 22 to be the earliest not onl

6 May 2026, 01:43 UTC≈5,910 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Artistic Reconstruction of an Andronovo man from Kazakhstan. Clothing patterns were inspired by Andronovo pottery patterns. I have done an artistic reconstruction referencing this skull before but wanted to improve accuracy and realism. Source of skull reference is from this paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361084568_Solodovnikov_KN_A_complex_study_of_anthropological_materials_of_the_Maitan_burial_gro

27 Apr 2026, 21:50 UTC≈1,170 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Corded Ware and Bell Beaker site Heatmaps It is noteworthy that in Central Germany, and Bohemia, Corded and Beaker coexisted until the Unetice Culture formed. However in Southwest Germany and Bavaria, Corded and Beaker sites are mutually exclusive Sampling Biases: For Bell Beaker in some parts of Iberia (such as Catalunia), otherwise accurate. For Corded Ware in Eastern Europe: there are likely more in the Baltic,

16 Apr 2026, 02:53 UTC≈1,730 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

The topic of the role of agriculture in reconstructed PIE is an interesting topic in my opinion. Many linguists believe PIE speakers had some limited knowledge of agriculture (even though pastoralism was the main economy). Many Sredny Stog settlements, such as Dereivka, are believed have not been permanently inhabited. It is proposed that Sredny Stog populations had some periods of mobility (but not full on steppe n

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @TheBeakerGirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 162,901 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TheBeakerLady” (@TheBeakerGirl), 1,341 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheBeakerGirl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.