Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TexTerra: всё про маркетинг

Channel

TexTerra: всё про маркетинг

@TexterraBlog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,484subscribers

-204 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001088776863
TypeChannel
Username@TexterraBlog
DescriptionDigital-агентство TexTerra. Публикуем мнения специалистов, полезные инструменты, кейсы и факапы. Медиа Текстерра: texterra.ru/blog По услугам и рекламе: @Maria_Shelukhina Регистрация в РКН: clck.ru/3F8Gbe
Created3 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TexterraBlog

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,48411,68811,5866 August 2026 — 11,688 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,688 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,678 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,674 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,670 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,667 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,659 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,664 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,661 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,657 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,653 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,639 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,638 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,632 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,631 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,623 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,616 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,618 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,645 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,648 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,651 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,649 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,642 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,643 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,638 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,635 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,636 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,625 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,584 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,573 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,574 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,569 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,560 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,559 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,557 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,555 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,556 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,557 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,549 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,550 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,547 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,541 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,538 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,534 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,530 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,528 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,523 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,520 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,515 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,513 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,507 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,501 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,493 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,490 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,485 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,487 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,484 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net -204. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,453–11,719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 19:3011,484-3
8 Nov 2026, 08:1011,487+2
7 Nov 2026, 00:4511,485-5
6 Nov 2026, 02:5511,490-3
5 Nov 2026, 03:0411,493-8
4 Nov 2026, 05:5711,501-6
3 Nov 2026, 06:2611,507-6
2 Nov 2026, 09:1211,513-2
1 Nov 2026, 05:3811,515-5
31 Oct 2026, 04:2111,520-3
30 Oct 2026, 02:5811,523-5
29 Oct 2026, 04:4111,528-2
28 Oct 2026, 06:1011,530-4
27 Oct 2026, 03:3011,534-4
26 Oct 2026, 06:1111,538-3
25 Oct 2026, 09:2011,541-6
24 Oct 2026, 06:4811,547-3
23 Oct 2026, 05:3811,550+1
22 Oct 2026, 06:1911,549-8
19 Oct 2026, 22:2611,557first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.77%
avg views ÷ 11,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
433
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held80 (16 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total9,955
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,840
Videos
≈690
Links
≈5,580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

398 reactions across 70 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15338.4%
👍12230.7%
❤10125.4%
custom 5469791965585354872143.52%
🎉20.503%
😐20.503%
🤔20.503%
👎10.251%
😢10.251%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC245 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Кажется, мы давно не напоминали: у нас есть рассылка 💌 Раз в две недели собираем: • свежие материалы по одной теме; • ближайшие события TexTerra; • практический вопрос недели: это небольшая проверка или чек-лист, которые можно применить к своему проекту. Новый выпуск — уже завтра. Подписаться можно здесь. Наш канал в «Максе» ➡️

❤1👍1👎1🔥1😐1

6 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC357 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Органика B2B-сайта не растет: ищем причину, а потом подрядчика У «Метросервиса» поисковый трафик вырос в 2,3 раза, а клиентов стало меньше. Заявки терялись в отделе продаж, и никакое SEO это бы не исправило. У других наших клиентов органику тормозили дубли страниц, запутанный каталог или узкий спрос в нише. Если вы смените подрядчика, не разобравшись в причине, то заплатите за работу, которая проблему не решит. …

❤1👍1🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTC321 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Что с органикой в B2B в 2026 году? Опрос ⬇️ Позиции на месте, а кликов все меньше. Блог пишется, а заявок с него нет. Знакомо? Мы сами видим очень разные истории. У одних клиентов органика растет на десятки процентов. У других трафик вырос в два раза, а продажи при этом упали (и причина оказалась вовсе не в сайте). Ответьте в опросе ниже, как ведет себя органика у вас или у ваших клиентов в этом году — давайте свер…

❤1👍1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC333 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

✍🏻 Мы постоянно повторяем клиентам: одного своего блога мало, нужен внешний контент-маркетинг. Нейросети собирают картину о бренде по всему интернету: по СМИ, отраслевым площадкам, рейтингам. И сами мы следуем этому совету: пишем экспертные материалы для крупных изданий. Раз вы подписаны на нас, наш контент вам, похоже, интересен — так что раз в месяц будем собирать здесь ссылки на издания, где еще можно нас почитат…

❤1👍1🔥1🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 10:31 UTC350 views6 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Контент-маркетинг не приносит заявок. Закрывать блог или искать причину? Контент накапливает эффект месяцами, а руководство пытается оценивать его по продажам, причем уже через два-три месяца. Да, этого времени мало для анализа, но ведь блог действительно может не работать! Понять, так ли это, по стандартным отчетам сложно: в отчете по последнему клику заявка достается брендовому поиску, а статья, с которой клиен…

👍2custom 54697919655853548722❤1🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 15:13 UTC385 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ 120 000 рублей «за все»: как поймать нейросеть на полуправде о компании Вы спрашиваете нейросеть, сколько стоит внедрение CRM в вашей компании. Она отвечает, что 120 000 рублей. Сумма названа верно, но лицензии и нестандартные интеграции оплачиваются отдельно. Чтобы AI не путались, что сколько стоит и сколько надо будет доплатить, нужна согласованная версия условий, которую вы начнете распространять на все источн…

👍2❤1🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 12:49 UTC478 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Исследование TexTerra: работает ли личный бренд врача на клинику в ответах нейросетей Если пациент знает имя врача, ChatGPT, Алиса и Google почти всегда верно называют его клинику: так получилось в 96% случаев в нашем исследовании. Но в небрендовых запросах, даже когда известный врач появляется в ответе, его клиника фигурирует с ним только в 69% случаев. 🩺 Проверили выдачу по врачам и клиникам и выяснили, кто из…

🔥2❤1🎉1👍1

29 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC441 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Обзор Writesonic: за что сервис берет от $79 в месяц Writesonic перестроился под GEO и теперь продает трекинг упоминаний бренда в ответах нейросетей. Только отслеживает он ChatGPT, Gemini и Google AI Overviews, а Поиск с Алисой и GigaChat — нет. К тому же карты российских банков сервис не принимает, а при тестировании кнопка бесплатного пробного периода в одном из зарубежных обзоров открыла оформление годовой под…

👍3🔥1custom 54697919655853548721

29 Oct 2026, 07:04 UTC441 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

AI-помощник освободил команде 50 (100, 200...) часов в месяц. Сколько компания на этом заработала? Возможно, ничего 🤔 Допустим, бот теперь отвечает клиентам на типовые вопросы. По расчетам у операторов освободилось время, на деле часть его уходит на проверку ответов бота и исправление его ошибок. Еще часть — на клиентов, которые не поверили боту и все равно позвонили. А оставшиеся часы просто растворяются в ожидании…

👍2❤1🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC414 views9 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Кейс GEO-аудита фармбренда: можно ли доверить Perplexity проверку источников Отвечая на вопросы о препарате от ОРВИ, Perplexity опирался на аптечные карточки и справочники, где часть сведений устарела или перепутана. Мы попросили его же оценить, каким из этих источников можно верить, и после ручной сверки целых шесть оценок из 11 пришлось исправить. Рассказали, что еще показал аудит и что произошло за первые два…

👍4🔥3❤2

27 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC442 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🍔 McDonald's два с половиной года тестировал AI-кассира и свернул проект. Но почему это скорее не провал, а успех? Обсуждаем в эфире 29 октября В 2021 году McDonald's начал тестировать голосового AI-помощника на автокассах: клиент называет заказ, система его принимает. Тогда CEO компании Крис Кемпчински предполагал, что через пять лет (то есть буквально сейчас, в 2026 году) голосовой заказ будет работать во всей сет…

❤3👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @TexterraBlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Маркетинг / Диджитал
@marketingj · 20,783
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
В школе этому не учат | Бизнес & Digital
@delaumoney · 53,316
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Практикум про диджитал-профессии
@mrkt_practicum · 25,311
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Зубастый маркетолог
@marketolog_digital · 46,533
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Инструменты маркетолога
@profit_maker · 45,389
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
Нетология
@netology_ru · 26,720
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Рекламщик от Бога
@Digitalmrktng · 20,055
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Skillbox: образовательная платформа
@skillboxru · 36,275
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Карты, тексты, два ствола
@remingtonist · 26,869
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TexTerra: всё про маркетинг” (@TexterraBlog), 11,484 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TexterraBlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.