Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تکست سی

@Text_C

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,099subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001138867125
TypeChannel
Username@Text_C
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Text_C

Growth

7,0997,1057,1026 August 2026 — 7,105 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,105 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,102 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,099 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,098–7,106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:567,099-3
9 Aug 2026, 14:157,102+3
6 Aug 2026, 20:457,099-6
6 Aug 2026, 03:167,105no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:217,105first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 7,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (23 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total35,577
Reactions total360
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

348 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19856.9%
6619.0%
😁339.48%
💔205.75%
🔥82.30%
🤣82.30%
👎72.01%
😍61.72%
😢20.575%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC304 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏وقتی ساعت ۲ شب اسنپ گرفتی و هم خودت، هم راننده مجبورید وانمود کنید از همدیگه نمی‌ترسید: @Text_C | تکستـ سے

🤣8😁2

11 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC280 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏من اگه برگردم عقب، هر متن بلندی که برای یکی فرستادم و هرتوضیحی که دادم رو پاک می‌کنم و به جاش فقط مینویسم “باشه”؛ چون بنظرم هیچ آدمی ارزش اون همه اعصاب خوردی و توضیح دادن رو نداشت. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

👍41

10 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC523 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏موتور سواری وقتی حال میده که ماشینت توی پارکینگه، خونه‌ی پدری وقتی آرامش داره که خونه‌ی خودت رو داری، و یه شاخه رز وقتی حس خوب داره که اتاقت پر از لیلیوم باشه. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

👍86

9 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC660 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"خوبم" را فقط به غریبه‌ها می‌گوییم آنانی را که دوست ‌می‌داریم؛ در آغوش می‌گیریم و گریه می‌کنیم @Text_C | تکستـ سے

🔥6

9 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC661 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏بدترین قسمت بعضی روزا اینه که نمی‌دونی دقیقا چی کمه، فقط می‌دونی یه چیزی سر جاش نیست. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

💔52

8 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC830 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

گفت : آخرین بی احترامی اش آنقدر شدید بود که دیگر خاطراتش هیچ ارزشی نداشت. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

👍18

7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC959 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آدم برای کسی که دوسش داره توضیح میده. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

👍181

6 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

کاش در پایان این بغض‌ها، خستگی‌ها، اندوه‌ها چیزی باشد که ارزش این همه دوام آوردن را داشته باشد. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

👍161

5 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,260 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏بخشی از من کنار آدم‌ اشتباهی تلف شد که بهترین بخشش بود. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

8👍5😢2

4 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,300 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

من وقتی پشتم به پسر خوشگله گرمه @Text_C | تکستـ سے

😁51

4 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,140 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بین کم و هیچی، لطفا هیچی رو انتخاب کنید. آدم‌های بلاتکلیف و عیاش رفاقت‌ های یکی دو روزه، رابطه‌ی انسانی نصفه و نیمه داغون‌تون میکنه نداشتن خیلی از چیز‌ا بهتر از نصفه و نیمه داشتنشونه، مخصوصا آدم‌ها. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

13👍1

4 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,120 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

جایی که بهت میگن "اگه دوست داری بیای، بیا" نرو. @Text_C | تکستـ سے

👍114

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Text_C. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 223,917 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تکست سی” (@Text_C), 7,099 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Text_C.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.