Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TestHelper TOEFL

Channel

TestHelper TOEFL

@TestHelperTOEFL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,654subscribers

+95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001346728886
TypeChannel
Username@TestHelperTOEFL
Descriptionتست‌هلپر، اولین و جامع‌ترین پلتفرم آمادگی آزمون‌های بین‌المللی زبان✈️ testhelper.com کانال تلگرام تافل تست‌هلپر: @TestHelperTOEFL دسترسی به تمام لینک‌های تست‌هلپر: @TestHelperLinks
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TestHelperTOEFL

Growth

9,5579,6549,605.57 August 2026 — 9,559 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,557 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,575 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,611 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,639 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,654 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,542–9,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 09:349,654+15
17 Aug 2026, 19:359,639+28
14 Aug 2026, 18:139,611+36
11 Aug 2026, 00:469,575+18
7 Aug 2026, 19:419,557-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:479,559first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 9,654 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held53 (16 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total57,490
Reactions total601
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
164
Videos
93
Links
1,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

742 reactions across 48 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54072.8%
👍567.55%
🔥537.14%
👏466.20%
🤯111.48%
🥰101.35%
🙏70.943%
🤣60.809%
🎉40.539%
🤩30.404%
20.27%
🆒20.27%
🤔20.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 742reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC347 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

⚡️ این بار میریم سراغ سریال دوست داشتنی Big Bang Theory و با هم با چند تا لغت جدید آشنا میشیم: Howard: Hey, Raj, I owe you an apology. Could you please put your dog on a leash? Penny: Sheldon, she's fine. Raj: Well, then at least hold her still, so I can pretend she's stuffed. Raj, I let my emotions get the best of me, and I unfairly took it out on you. Raj's Father: Thank you. I appreciate that. Raj: Oh, I can'

3

19 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

سلام دوستان نتایج منم اومد خیلی ممنونم از تیم تست هلپر که بدون سایت خوبشون و راهنمایی هاشون این نتایج ممکن نبود🌷✨ درمورد تجربیات هم: من سطح زبان بالایی دارم و جنرالم مشکلی نداشت برای یک ددلاین احتیاج داشتم تافل رو و دوهفته وقت گذاشتم و بدون ماک ازمون اصلی رو شرکت کردم اگر سوالی هست خوشحال میشم پاسخ بدم🩷🌷

👍42

19 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,140 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🔧 Before & After: TOEFL Writing (PART 1) بیایید یک پاراگراف معمولی رو نجات بدیم 😄 زبان‌آموز نوشته: I think cities should spend more money on public transportation because it is very useful. Many people use buses and trains every day. It can help people and also reduce traffic. Therefore, public transportation is very important for cities. این متن غلط نیست؛ مشکلش اینه که خیلی کلی نوشته شده. 📌 عبارت‌هایی مثل: very use

20👍2

19 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,210 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026

تجربه یکی از کاربران تست هلپر که نمره کامل گرفتن👏😍

🔥62👏1

19 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

در رابطه با #تجربه ام از مطالعه هم من در كل پايه زبانم خوب بود و چند سال كلاس خصوصي ميرفتم ولي ٦ سالي ميشد كه ول كرده بودم و زماني كه ميخواستم شروع كنم براي تافل بخونم حدودا b2 بودم. يه دوره فشرده تافل هم ثبت نام كردم كه بنظرم مفيد بود ولي از بعدش فقط با تست هلپر و تست زدن جلو رفتم. من از اسفند شروع كردم ولي خورد به جنگ و يك ماهيو متاسفانه از دست دادم و روي هم فك كنم ٤-٥ ماه مفيد خوندم. براي لسنينگ و ريدينگ فقط نئو ه

2

19 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC968 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

در رابطه با #تجربه خود آزمون بنظرم بطور كلي در حد نئو ها بود و خيلي سختتر نبود. ريدينگ من فك كنم دوتا اكادميك تكراري داشتم يدونه complete the words. و به غير از اينا بنظرم همه متنهاش خوب بود و بيش از حد سنگين نبود ولي يكي از تسك ١ ها بنظرم چالشي بود و با شك جواب دادم لسنينگ صادقانه بخوابم بگم بنظرم تسك ١ چنتا از سوالاش از نئو ها سطحش بالاتر بود ولي بقيه سوالاش آسون بود هم anouncement و conversation هم lecture ها. و ب

1

19 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC955 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

من ١٥ آگوست خاتم امتحان دادم و در كل از سنتر راضي بودم. محيط مسئولين و سيستم ها همه اوك بود ولي من علامه سخن هم دوبار ماك دادم و تجربم از اونجارو هم ميگم براي دوستاني كه ميخوان انتخاب كنن. سالن خاتم بزرگتر بود و با اينكه ما حدودا ٢٠ و خورده اي نفر بوديم با فاصله مارو چيدن و سر و صدا اصلا اذيت نكرد و خداييش همه هم رعايت كردن و كسي بلند حرف نميزد. ولي سالن علامه كوچيك تره اگه با فضاهاي دنج تر راحتترين ميتونه گزينه مناس

2

19 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,040 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

سلام دوستان نمره من هم اومد خيلي تشكر ميكنم از تيم خوب تست هلپر و زحماتشون 🙏🏻 #تجربه ام رو هم باهاتون به اشتراك ميذارم انشالا كه كمك كننده باشه.

13🤯7

17 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,180 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🙏74👏2🥰1

17 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,120 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

8👏2🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

7🔥3👏2

17 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,100 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

7👏3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @TestHelperTOEFL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@TestHelperTOEFL edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,035,162 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

StartQuiz
@Startquiz · 64,443
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Writing & Grammar 👨‍🏫
@writingandgrammar · 57,890
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
📖📚 شیفتگان کتــــــاب 📚📖
@shifteganketab · 83,668
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
منابع پروپوزال،مقاله،پایان نامه
@PAPhd · 64,399
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
houshang_academy
@zameeni · 99,040
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TestHelper TOEFL” (@TestHelperTOEFL), 9,654 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TestHelperTOEFL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.