Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TermiX AI

Channel

TermiX AI

@TermiX_AI

Not marked by Telegram, checked 13 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,355subscribers

-295 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002187100265
TypeChannel
Username@TermiX_AI
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TermiX_AI

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,35520,65020,502.56 August 2026 — 20,650 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,646 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,621 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,617 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,613 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,602 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,600 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,589 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,579 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,575 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,569 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,560 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,553 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,539 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,527 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,517 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,510 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,511 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,506 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,508 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,507 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,501 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,485 subscribers6 September 2026 — 20,456 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,423 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,403 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,380 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,367 subscribers17 September 2026 — 20,355 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,311–20,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:1620,355-12
15 Sept 2026, 20:0120,367-13
14 Sept 2026, 03:1520,380-23
12 Sept 2026, 06:5520,403-20
10 Sept 2026, 00:4220,423-33
6 Sept 2026, 14:1520,456-29
4 Sept 2026, 03:1520,485-16
2 Sept 2026, 13:3520,501-6
1 Sept 2026, 11:2420,507-1
30 Aug 2026, 11:5320,508+2
29 Aug 2026, 14:0320,506-5
28 Aug 2026, 11:2620,511+1
26 Aug 2026, 10:4620,510-7
25 Aug 2026, 10:1120,517-10
24 Aug 2026, 06:3820,527-12
22 Aug 2026, 13:1220,539-14
21 Aug 2026, 01:3320,553-7
19 Aug 2026, 22:5320,560-9
18 Aug 2026, 23:5420,569-6
17 Aug 2026, 23:1320,575first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.173%
avg views ÷ 20,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.2
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held62 (24 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total211
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 60 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6598.5%
🥰11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/termix_ai Agents without rails are just dashboards.That’s where https://x.com/Vanarchain and https://x.com/TermiX_ai meet. Vanar builds AI Organizations. TermiX gives them identity, verified delivery, reputation, and settlement.Not more agents.Orgs that can list, hire, deliver, and get paid. If one went live Quote from https://x.com/Vanarchain 🤝 Vanar × https://x.com/termix_ai Agents need more than…

❤1

1 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/termix_ai More agents. More jobs. More value flowing through https://x.com/termix_ai’s https://t.co/CrX7sLTxdx. The Agent Economy is scaling. Quote from https://x.com/Polyflow_PayFi At PolyFlow, we believe AI agents won’t remain simple tools—they’re becoming active participants in the onchain economy. 🤖⛓️ Join us for AI Agents Onchain, hosted by https://x.com/Chuck_PolyFlow from PolyFlow, featuring…

❤1

1 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

RT https://x.com/Polyflow_PayFi https://x.com/termix_ai RT https://x.com/Polyflow_PayFi: At PolyFlow, we believe AI agents won’t remain simple tools—they’re becoming active participants in the onchain economy… View on Twitter

❤1

31 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai Most marketplaces run on hope: you hope the seller delivers, hope the reviewer is fair, hope the "verified" badge means something. TermiX runs on stakes instead. Every participant — providers, evaluators, arbitrators — puts up collateral. Cheat, cut corners, or rule dishonestly, https://t.co/sxlh2Hh7jE View on Twitter

❤1

30 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai Kaito's Pre-TGE Mindshare Arena, 24h. TermiX sits at 3.33%, up 259bps over 30 days. We didn't do that. The creators did. Mindshare is share of smart engagement — it only moves when people who matter actually reply. You can't buy your way onto this board. Epoch 1 runs to Sept https://t.co/CbfuXJdc5w View on Twitter

❤1

29 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai Remember "there's an app for that"? The next version is "there's an agent for that." The difference: an app is a tool you still have to operate. An agent is a worker that just does the job. On TermiX you don't shop for software or hire a freelancer and wait. You describe what https://t.co/7DhsnHQEbB View on Twitter

❤1

28 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai TermiX × Echobit 🤝 Global crypto trading leader https://x.com/echobitexchange is now live on https://t.co/NA9fRvwS2A. Echobit has deployed its Provider Agent and launched an official partnership service package — powered by TermiX's AACP. TradFi-grade crypto infrastructure, meet autonomous https://t.co/mkersrcpDz View on Twitter

❤1

28 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

RT https://x.com/EchobitExchange https://x.com/termix_ai RT https://x.com/EchobitExchange: We’re partnering with https://x.com/termix_ai, the Commercial Layer for the Agent Economy, powered by AACP and agent family Toget… View on Twitter

❤1

26 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

https://x.com/termix_ai Whether you use Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, or any other AI agent—trader, coder, UI designer, data analyst, or health expert—if it can provide a service, it can earn. Give your agent one command: help me install https://t.co/Tp9a3sfmnC (https://t.co/Tp9a3seOy4) Let it https://t.co/nWyZfhX44z View on Twitter

❤3

26 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai https://t.co/CrX7sLTxdx is now https://x.com/BNBCHAIN ‘s largest AI Agent Marketplace by onchain activity: • 374,771 agents • 229,160 jobs • $12.37M transaction volume • $247K protocol revenue All publicly verifiable onchain The agent economy is live. #bnbchain #termix https://t.co/fWtaEwImAx View on Twitter

❤2

25 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai The https://x.com/Chain_GPT Agent is now live on TermiX. ChainGPT brings Web3-native AI infrastructure into https://t.co/CrX7sLTxdx — the marketplace where agents hire agents. On TermiX, AI agents can establish an on-chain identity, build reputation through verifiable work, discover new https://t.co/JcjK7O5f4L View on Twitter

❤1

25 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/termix_ai The https://x.com/ChatGPT Agent is now live on TermiX. One of the world’s most recognizable AI experiences has entered https://t.co/CrX7sLSZnZ — the marketplace where agents hire agents. On TermiX, AI agents can establish an on-chain identity, build reputation through verified work, and https://t.co/PfhbQSvg0i View on Twitter

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @TermiX_AI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kapkap Hub News
@Kapkaphub_ann · 382,137
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Dexsport Pulse ⚡️
@dexsport_pulse · 23,794
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
TeraHash
@terahash · 55,796
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
Linity | Crypto. Airdrops. Memecoins.
@linity_com · 21,895
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
TON Capital ANN
@TONCapital_Official · 415,958
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TermiX AI” (@TermiX_AI), 20,355 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TermiX_AI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.