Channel
@Temirlans_Opinion
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,384subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001870359548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Temirlans_Opinion |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Temirlans_Opinion |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1,910 average views per post against 1,381 subscribers — an engagement rate of 138.4%. Across the 48,877 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 9.88% and 33.3%, with a median of 18.8%.
| Window | 30 days (19 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 19 of 20 published in the window (3 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 36,306 |
| Mature posts only | 147.5% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,381 measured 16 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:rus · 48,877 channels · p10 5.05% · p25 9.88% · p50 18.8% · p75 33.3% · p90 53.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.153th percentile · 7.4× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.226% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 1,384 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 1,381 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 1,376 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 1,368 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 1,359 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 1,360 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 1,360 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,306 |
| Reactions total | 1,269 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🇮🇹 | Разбор аренды – Франко Мастантуоно. На очереди интервью с нашим хорошим знакомым по предыдущему посту с Вальдепеньясом – автор канала Грацио Тоскана https://t.me/graziatoscana. Обязательно подписывайтесь, чтобы следить за нашими кантерано там! ____________ 1) Мастантуоно не является вингером в классическом понимании, ему удобнее играть в правом полуфланге, где рядом ширину поддерживает фулбек/вингер. Так вот, …
Signed Темирлан
Цикл замкнулся.
Signed Темирлан
🇪🇸 | Разбор трансфера — Фран Гонсалес. Воспитанник "Мадрида" Фран Гонсалес недавно перешел в "Севилью" и хотелось разобрать его перспективы в новом клубе. Однако, столкнулся с незнанием контекста команды, куда он перешел. Поэтому мне удалось связаться с самым лояльным болельщиком "Севильи" в русскоязычном пространстве — Артемом, ведущий отличный канал https://t.me/LosSevillistas. Разбор в формате интервью, надеюсь …
Signed Темирлан
📹 | Последние 20 попыток обводок Винисиуса.
Signed Темирлан
📝 | В чем мотив "Арсеналу" идти за Винисиусом сейчас? Интуитивно, казалось бы, у игрока контракт истекает через год, то есть можно не платить за него сумму трансфера (120+ млн евро), а самому игроку можно дать подписной бонус и больше зарплату, чтобы его задобрить. Однако, суть в том, что конкуренция за Винисиуса, в любом случае, будет больше, чем сейчас. Те же "Сити", "Ливерпуль" и ПСЖ могут включиться в гонку за…
Signed Темирлан
📝 | По вчерашнему матчу стало понятно, что в крайних случаях мы можем использовать Трента вместе с Дюмфрисом. Я думаю, что особенно актуальным это может стать против автобусов, где Дюмфрис сможет атаковать штрафную и таким образом помогать нагружать защиту соперников. Либо же, можно использовать их вместе против команд, где левый фланг соперников опасен и благодаря сдвоению фланга обеспечивать надежность сзади.
Signed Темирлан
Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed Темирлан
Трент и Эспи пока репетируют 😁
Signed Темирлан
Легенда. https://t.me/Temirlans_Opinion/1438
Signed Темирлан
🇮🇹 | Ответил на несколько вопросов по Вальдепеньясу. https://t.me/graziatoscana/5382
Signed Темирлан
📝 | "Байер" идеально выбрал себе замену Гримальдо по профилю. Мигель Гутьеррес, как и Алехандро, является вингбеком, который нацелен на созидание атак и на продвижение мяча. К сожалению, в "Наполи" у Конте на его позиции играл Спинацолла, а Мигеля вынудили играть правым вингбеком, что является для него незнакомой позицией. Если в "Байере" ему дадут ту же свободу в действиях и в движении, что была у Гримальдо, то Г…
Signed Темирлан
📝 | По заявке я удивился нахождению Аймара Гарсии (2007), так как я даже забыл, что его подписали в нашу академию. Это центральный защитник ростом 192 см, которого в феврале предварительно подписали из "Атлетико Мадрида". Интересно тут то, что с тех пор Аймара "Атлетико" перестал заявлять на матчи от слова совсем и у него не было практики на протяжении полугода. https://t.me/LSR_RM/83271
Signed Темирлан
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Temirlans_Opinion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 86,467 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Обводки Лукаса | Мысли Темирлана” (@Temirlans_Opinion), 1,384 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Temirlans_Opinion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.