Posted without readable text
custom 53823393318578821912❤1custom 52109261734622396021custom 53841304534793988451custom 54021382506241439411

Channel
@Telega_Garimana
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,574subscribers
-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001872288247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Telega_Garimana |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Telega_Garimana |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 1,574 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 1,586 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 1,590 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 1,599 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 1,606 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 1,612 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 1,615 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,624 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 1,628 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 1,636 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 1,645 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,647 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 1,647 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
281 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5210926173462239602 | 74 | 26.3% | |
| custom 5384130453479398845 | 72 | 25.6% | |
| custom 5382339331857882191 | 56 | 19.9% | |
| custom 5402138250624143941 | 39 | 13.9% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 4.98% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.56% | |
| custom 5424785441377249679 | 9 | 3.20% | |
| custom 5427242940059644084 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.356% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Telega_Garimana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 53823393318578821912❤1custom 52109261734622396021custom 53841304534793988451custom 54021382506241439411
Posted without readable text
❤1custom 53823393318578821911custom 54021382506241439411
Posted without readable text
❤1custom 53823393318578821911custom 53841304534793988451
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52109261734622396023custom 53823393318578821913custom 53841304534793988453
🤩 ИИ-ПУЗЫРЬ СТАЛКИВАЕТСЯ С ЭКОНОМИКОЙ: ГДЕ ОКУПАЕМОСТЬ? По расчетам The Economist, гигантам ИИ требуется $2,5 трлн ежегодной выручки, чтобы просто окупить инвестиции. Это превышает выручку всего технологического сектора. 🤩 Цифры и факты: 🟢 Текущий доход: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft, Meta и SpaceX суммарно генерируют на ИИ лишь ~$150 млрд. 🟢 Спад корпоративного спроса: Доля сотрудников, использующих ИИ, упа…
custom 52109261734622396027custom 53841304534793988455custom 54021382506241439414custom 53823393318578821912
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53823393318578821914❤2custom 53841304534793988452custom 54021382506241439412custom 52109261734622396021
𝔾-𝕋𝕖𝕒𝕞 ℂ𝕣𝕪𝕡𝕥𝕠 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤 pinned «🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️»
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️
custom 53823393318578821915custom 54021382506241439414❤2custom 52109261734622396022custom 53841304534793988451
🇺🇦 ЗАКОН О КРИПТОВАЛЮТАХ В УКРАИНЕ ГОТОВ НА 90% Законопроект о виртуальных активах выходит на финишную прямую, заявил глава НКЦБФР Алексей Семенюк. Текст доработают в августе. Главное из документа: Регуляция: НКЦБФР становится ключевым регулятором. Стандарты: База адаптивна под европейский MiCA, согласовано лицензирование VASP. Пробелы: Налоги, статус активов в судах и переходный период пока открыты. 💭 Мысли G: По…
custom 52109261734622396026custom 54247854413772496795custom 54272429400596440844custom 53823393318578821911custom 53841304534793988451
Video message, posted without a caption
😁10
🏛 СКОТТ БЕССЕНТ ПРОТИВ СЕНАТА: BLOCK AROUND CLARITY ACT Глава Минфина США Скотт Бессент заявила, что демократы в Сенате блокируют принятие законопроекта Crypto Clarity Act, затягивая голосование перед летними каникулами. В чем тупик❓ Для прохождения фильтра республиканцам нужны 7 голосов демократов. Главный камень преткновения — этический пакет: оппоненты требуют жестких ограничений на доходы чиновников и президен…
custom 53841304534793988457custom 52109261734622396024custom 54247854413772496793custom 53823393318578821912
🤩 МАЙНИНГ БИТКОИНА И ПИВО: ИДЕАЛЬНЫЙ КЕЙС ИЗ АВСТРАЛИИ Пивоварня Hawkesbury Brewing использует избыточное тепло от биткоин-майнинга для варки 100 000 литров пива в месяц. В чем суть❓ 16 асиков на иммерсионном охлаждении нагревают жидкость до 90°C. Через теплообменник эта энергия греет воду для варки и стерилизации. Майнеры работают от солнечных панелей и приносят ~$2 000 в месяц, покрывая расходы. 💭 Мысли G: Вмес…
custom 53841304534793988458custom 52109261734622396025custom 54021382506241439414❤2custom 53823393318578821911
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Telega_Garimana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔾-𝕋𝕖𝕒𝕞 ℂ𝕣𝕪𝕡𝕥𝕠 ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕤” (@Telega_Garimana), 1,574 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Telega_Garimana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.