Telegram Proxies pinned «https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=CxlU0Y8i LFG! PAWS is the new top dog! 🐾»

Channel
Telegram Proxies
@TelProxys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,272subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001259573413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TelProxys |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 11 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TelProxys |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 2,272 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 2,271 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 2,270 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 2,271 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 11 June 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=CxlU0Y8i LFG! PAWS is the new top dog! 🐾
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
File, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
File, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
Video, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
File, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
https://t.me/proxy?server=iranhost.com.severnserver.ir.pars.hosting.pars.pro.mihanwebhost.com.hostiran.net.irwebhost.net.ejhost.ir.webhostingtalk.ir.xlhost.com.gmail.com.google.com.digikala.com.wdiojwaiewqoidqwedqd.hex.md5.aes.python.and.toro-jane-bachat-az-ma-bekesh-biron.ga&port=8080&secret=3TK5IN_7UWQwKOL2uHjU6sE
Signed мя ρσσуα
استفاده از کانفیگ سرور v2ray استفاده شده در TeleDR و ElectronProxy دریافت v2RayNG از گوگل پلی: Enter Google Play raw.githubusercontent.com/HaCkErNiCe/TeleDrConfig/master/config.json آدرس فایل کانفیگ بالا را از قسمت زیر به برنامه اضافه کرده و فعال کنید: + > custom config > import custom config from URL متصل شوید: t.me/socks?server=127.0.0.1&port=30002 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚜️ @CyberSoldiersST
Signed мя ρσσуα
File, posted without a caption
Signed мя ρσσуα
https://t.me/proxy?server=163.172.151.169&port=7973&secret=ee43f0b3e525f91650d531646c9c9c05027777772e736974652e636f6d
Signed мя ρσσуα
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TelProxys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,131,950 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TelProxys named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram Proxies” (@TelProxys), 2,272 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TelProxys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.