Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ‡­πŸ‡Ή π—•π—”π—‘π—žπ—”π—œ 𝗦𝗣𝗒π—₯𝗧𝗦 πŸ‡­πŸ‡Ή

Channel

πŸ‡­πŸ‡Ή π—•π—”π—‘π—žπ—”π—œ 𝗦𝗣𝗒π—₯𝗧𝗦 πŸ‡­πŸ‡Ή

@Tejontips

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

6,603subscribers

-2,853 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783363001
TypeChannel
Username@Tejontips
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tejontips

Growth

6,6039,4568,029.516 August 2026 β€” 9,456 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 9,354 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 8,859 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 8,165 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 7,718 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 7,093 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 6,603 subscribers16 August 20262 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2,853. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,175–9,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 11:146,603-490
30 Aug 2026, 06:117,093-625
27 Aug 2026, 14:047,718-447
24 Aug 2026, 11:258,165-694
20 Aug 2026, 23:048,859-495
17 Aug 2026, 19:159,354-102
16 Aug 2026, 19:459,456first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
3.59%
avg views Γ· 6,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.659%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held43 (6 August 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total9,017
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀770.0%
πŸ†220.0%
😒110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC242 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Β‘PROYECTO TERMINADO. OBJETIVO CUMPLIDO! 🚨 πŸ”₯ 5 DÍAS. 5 ETAPAS. 5 ACIERTOS. πŸ”₯ 🎯 CUOTA 1.50 β€” PERFECTO DE PRINCIPIO A FIN. Empezamos con una idea. Seguimos con trabajo. Y hoy terminamos demostrando que la constancia tambiΓ©n gana. πŸ’₯ πŸ† 5/5 β€” 100% COMPLETADO βœ… Esto no es el final… es una advertencia de lo que viene. πŸ€ Β‘ALLÁ VAMOS, BANKAIIIIIII! πŸ€

❀1

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

23 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC265 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Info Arrived 🀩 ..... ❀CONFIRM TICKET 🎫 πŸ”·VVIP GAMES TIPS: COMBOS SCORES EXACT πŸ”· ODDS: 1000.00βœ… @GENERALTEJON

πŸ†2

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

22 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC278 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

22 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC256 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

21 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❀1

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

21 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC244 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

New Info Arrived 🀩 ..... ❀CONFIRM TICKET 🎫 πŸ”·VVIP GAMES TIPS: COMBOS SCORES EXACT πŸ”· ODDS: 720.00 βœ… @GENERALTEJON

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

21 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC219 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

21 Aug 2026, 01:52 UTC206 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

20 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC243 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

20 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC208 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed GÉNÉRAL TEJÓN

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Tejontips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

π‹π„π†πˆπ“ π“πˆππ’
@Correct_scores_fixed_odds Β· 31,619
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here β€” alongside 56 others β€” read 6 September 2026
Correct scores betting tips
@adabari Β· 215,867
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 52 here β€” alongside 51 others β€” read 2 September 2026
Peguy_tbn
@peguy_tbn1 Β· 33,332
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here β€” alongside 71 others β€” read 4 September 2026
Bet Win KE
@betwinkeofficial Β· 96,794
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here β€” alongside 77 others β€” read 16 August 2026
πƒπ„π’πŒπŽππƒ πƒπŽπ’π’βš”οΈπŸ₯·πŸΏ
@lien_desmonddoss5 Β· 36,329
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 65 here β€” alongside 64 others β€” read 1 September 2026
π™π™žπ™–π™—π™‘π™š π™₯𝙧𝙀𝙣𝙀𝙨 π™₯𝙑π™ͺπ™¨πŸ€΄
@lionelprono66 Β· 32,780
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 70 here β€” alongside 69 others β€” read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ‡­πŸ‡Ή π—•π—”π—‘π—žπ—”π—œ 𝗦𝗣𝗒π—₯𝗧𝗦 πŸ‡­πŸ‡Ήβ€ (@Tejontips), 6,603 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tejontips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.