Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ted Pillows Official

Channel

Ted Pillows Official

@TedpillowsOfficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

109,931subscribers

+3,995 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002303948489
TypeChannel
Username@TedpillowsOfficial
Description🖐 | REAL ACCOUNT Investor KOL and entrepreneur $YOURAL. Proud #Binance and #Bybit_Official partner. Admin: @TedPillowsAdmin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TedpillowsOfficial

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

102,262120,289111,275.57 August 2026 — 105,936 subscribers7 August 2026 — 105,936 subscribers8 August 2026 — 105,839 subscribers8 August 2026 — 105,586 subscribers10 August 2026 — 105,311 subscribers11 August 2026 — 105,087 subscribers12 August 2026 — 102,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 105,645 subscribers14 August 2026 — 105,297 subscribers16 August 2026 — 104,787 subscribers17 August 2026 — 104,409 subscribers18 August 2026 — 103,750 subscribers19 August 2026 — 108,235 subscribers20 August 2026 — 107,114 subscribers21 August 2026 — 106,727 subscribers23 August 2026 — 106,306 subscribers24 August 2026 — 105,917 subscribers25 August 2026 — 105,779 subscribers26 August 2026 — 105,692 subscribers27 August 2026 — 105,534 subscribers28 August 2026 — 105,001 subscribers29 August 2026 — 104,658 subscribers31 August 2026 — 108,132 subscribers1 September 2026 — 112,553 subscribers2 September 2026 — 113,354 subscribers3 September 2026 — 120,289 subscribers5 September 2026 — 120,122 subscribers9 September 2026 — 119,087 subscribers11 September 2026 — 117,941 subscribers13 September 2026 — 115,656 subscribers14 September 2026 — 114,120 subscribers16 September 2026 — 113,352 subscribers19 September 2026 — 112,843 subscribers25 September 2026 — 109,931 subscribers109,9317 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net +3,995. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99,558–122,993 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 15:00109,931-2,912
19 Sept 2026, 04:15112,843-509
16 Sept 2026, 18:41113,352-768
14 Sept 2026, 20:37114,120-1,536
13 Sept 2026, 10:41115,656-2,285
11 Sept 2026, 17:38117,941-1,146
9 Sept 2026, 03:56119,087-1,035
5 Sept 2026, 18:42120,122-167
3 Sept 2026, 17:36120,289+6,935
2 Sept 2026, 06:53113,354+801
1 Sept 2026, 04:45112,553+4,421
31 Aug 2026, 01:07108,132+3,474
29 Aug 2026, 22:05104,658-343
28 Aug 2026, 21:32105,001-533
27 Aug 2026, 21:42105,534-158
26 Aug 2026, 20:44105,692-87
25 Aug 2026, 20:52105,779-138
24 Aug 2026, 20:58105,917-389
23 Aug 2026, 05:04106,306-421
21 Aug 2026, 16:46106,727first reading

Engagement

759 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.13%
avg views ÷ 109,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,640
373 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
373
of 759 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 373 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held759 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total2,105,078
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,300
Videos
≈298
Links
≈333

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 41s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1161.1%
🤩316.7%
👍211.1%
🍌15.56%
💊15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 759 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 759 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC≈7,370 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

Only 9 coins out of the top 100 are in red over the last 3 months. After months of suffering, crypto holders are finally getting the pump they deserve.

27 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC≈7,370 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Some $BTC bidding happening on Binance right now. Buyers really want a close above $85,400 now.

27 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC≈7,390 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

$95,000 BTC is the most popular bet for October 2026. $75,000 BTC is the most popular bet for November 2026. It seems like big money is betting on a bullish October followed by a correction in November.

27 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC≈7,380 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

This is not Bitcoin, Solana, or AI stock. This is Bitfinex $ETH short positions. Someone is betting up aggressively on the Ethereum dump right now.

🍌1

27 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈7,380 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

There's only a 14% chance that the Clarity Act will become law in the next 12 months. But does Clarity really matter now? SEC and CFTC are already working towards pro-crypto regulations, and institutions are dipping their toes in the Altcoin space. Clarity will definitely accelerate the adoption, but that doesn't mean crypto won't get regulations if Clarity doesn't pass.

27 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC≈7,140 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

$ETH is back above the $2,700 level. A weekly close above $2,800 could push Ethereum to $3,400.

27 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC≈7,140 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

$BTC weekly close will happen today. And it looks like Bitcoin will hold above $83,000. This is a sign that buyers are still in control, and if BTC breaks above $85,300 from here, it could rally to new local highs.

26 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC≈6,810 viewsread 27 September 2026

While others step away, investors are still: Securing presale allocations Using dips for structured entries Building positions with discipline Slots remain available for those who understand the strategy and are prepared for the risks. We remain focused. 🚀 👉 https://t.me/TedPillowsAdmin

26 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC≈6,800 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x72031fb00f53cb6dc3349d8029cfda3ec605bd029807457543ea67c0d06d3fbf

26 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC≈6,800 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x441d3286cf85928d01f8e70a7d925446696cde5d82a09e3244492c9bfd7c7e93

26 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC≈6,800 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x95c9101a1a9fd5f0f33c76a57fbcb4171168185367c309690112316aef36518b

Showing the 12 most recent of 759 posts we hold for @TedpillowsOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ted Pillows Official” (@TedpillowsOfficial), 109,931 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TedpillowsOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.