Only 9 coins out of the top 100 are in red over the last 3 months. After months of suffering, crypto holders are finally getting the pump they deserve.

Channel
Ted Pillows Official
@TedpillowsOfficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109,931subscribers
+3,995 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002303948489 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TedpillowsOfficial |
| Description | 🖐 | REAL ACCOUNT Investor KOL and entrepreneur $YOURAL. Proud #Binance and #Bybit_Official partner. Admin: @TedPillowsAdmin |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TedpillowsOfficial |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 109,931 | -2,912 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 112,843 | -509 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 113,352 | -768 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 114,120 | -1,536 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 115,656 | -2,285 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 117,941 | -1,146 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 119,087 | -1,035 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 120,122 | -167 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 120,289 | +6,935 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:53 | 113,354 | +801 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:45 | 112,553 | +4,421 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 108,132 | +3,474 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 104,658 | -343 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 105,001 | -533 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 105,534 | -158 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 105,692 | -87 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 105,779 | -138 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 105,917 | -389 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 106,306 | -421 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 106,727 | first reading |
Engagement
759 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.13%
- avg views ÷ 109,931 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,640
- 373 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.01%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 373
- of 759 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 373 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 759 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,105,078 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,300
- Videos
- ≈298
- Links
- ≈333
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12m 41s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 61.1% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 759 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 759 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Some $BTC bidding happening on Binance right now. Buyers really want a close above $85,400 now.
$95,000 BTC is the most popular bet for October 2026. $75,000 BTC is the most popular bet for November 2026. It seems like big money is betting on a bullish October followed by a correction in November.
This is not Bitcoin, Solana, or AI stock. This is Bitfinex $ETH short positions. Someone is betting up aggressively on the Ethereum dump right now.
🍌1
There's only a 14% chance that the Clarity Act will become law in the next 12 months. But does Clarity really matter now? SEC and CFTC are already working towards pro-crypto regulations, and institutions are dipping their toes in the Altcoin space. Clarity will definitely accelerate the adoption, but that doesn't mean crypto won't get regulations if Clarity doesn't pass.
$ETH is back above the $2,700 level. A weekly close above $2,800 could push Ethereum to $3,400.
$BTC weekly close will happen today. And it looks like Bitcoin will hold above $83,000. This is a sign that buyers are still in control, and if BTC breaks above $85,300 from here, it could rally to new local highs.
GM☕️. Enjoy your Sunday friends.
While others step away, investors are still: Securing presale allocations Using dips for structured entries Building positions with discipline Slots remain available for those who understand the strategy and are prepared for the risks. We remain focused. 🚀 👉 https://t.me/TedPillowsAdmin
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x72031fb00f53cb6dc3349d8029cfda3ec605bd029807457543ea67c0d06d3fbf
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x441d3286cf85928d01f8e70a7d925446696cde5d82a09e3244492c9bfd7c7e93
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x95c9101a1a9fd5f0f33c76a57fbcb4171168185367c309690112316aef36518b
Showing the 12 most recent of 759 posts we hold for @TedpillowsOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ted Pillows Official” (@TedpillowsOfficial), 109,931 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TedpillowsOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.