Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐓𝐄𝐂𝐇𝐍𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐄 OC 𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒆𝒓 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 •°

@TechnoLikeOCtriggercf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003569356065
TypeChannel
Username@TechnoLikeOCtriggercf
DescriptionБот для тейков : @TechnolikeOCHateBot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 7 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TechnoLikeOCtriggercf

Growth

3512 Aug 2026, 08:32 — 35 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:45 — 35 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:3212 Aug 2026, 08:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:4535no change
12 Aug 2026, 08:3235first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53324724594488508325733.7%
custom 53327578815005010545331.4%
custom 53327726905477407762414.2%
custom 53324412307416385822313.6%
custom 5332698507872605408127.10%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Mar 2026, 14:31 UTC217 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что это... #тейк

custom 53327578815005010543custom 53327726905477407762custom 53326985078726054081

10 Mar 2026, 09:32 UTC204 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Собственно говоря, а какие ФП вам запомнились больше всего а какие не нравится до ужаса? Больше всего интересно узнать какой перс не нравится большему количеству человек, проблема в дизайне или в описании. Больше всего наврное раздражают ФП которые не связаны с вселенной но их пытаются оправдать, тот же идол жира (рофл) схаха. #тейк

custom 53324724594488508323custom 53326985078726054082

8 Mar 2026, 19:06 UTC190 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

бесит, что в ТЛОСКФ чате внимание получают только те, кто больше всех подсосался к другим. у многих персонажи интереснее, но на них забьют болт, потому что они не стали в очередной раз подлизываться к кому-то. даже на админов хуй клали. тот самый хайп куда-то исчез, про кибера вообще молчат, этни забыли, хотя они пытались общаться и проявлять себя, все трое. в итоге этот фд как одно большое клеймо, чтобы тебя замети

custom 53327578815005010546custom 53324724594488508325custom 53327726905477407763custom 53326985078726054082

8 Mar 2026, 18:39 UTC171 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Триггер на чат тлоскф Прикол нах когда всем постоянно там пишут комплименты и постоянно лижут жопу до блеска, но как только я четв кидаю так всем насрать Я понимаю что этого не избежать но я же не настолько хуево рисую что даже времени не достоин блять 😐😑😑😑 #тейк

custom 53327726905477407765custom 53324724594488508323custom 53327578815005010543custom 53326985078726054081

7 Mar 2026, 10:37 UTC140 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Триггер на людей, которые не умеют читать и пишут отсебятину какую-то, лишь бы уж как-то обосрать ОСа. А другие тупо подхватывают, потому что тоже долбятся в глаза. Одна ошибка, и ты ошибся ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ #тейк 🌟 - и в чем он не прав

custom 53324724594488508327custom 53327578815005010544custom 53326985078726054081custom 53327726905477407761

6 Mar 2026, 16:30 UTC134 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Триггер на челов, которые кидают какой-то мега всратый (и даже не рофельный) скетч, тем самым перекрывая норм тейки с ахуенным артом, которым люди ещё не успели насладиться. "А вы помните моего фп..." Чел, ты блять один раз сто лет назад запостил тейк со своим скучным осом. Кто его помнит? #тейк 🌟 - и в чем он не прав

custom 53327578815005010546custom 53324724594488508322

5 Mar 2026, 19:05 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌟 Привет пишите тейки. Да самосливы можно

custom 53326985078726054083custom 53324724594488508322

26 Feb 2026, 19:43 UTC172 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

лимита не хватило на отправку сообщения и персонажей, так что фото скину отдельно Поговорим о новой проблеме, у нас осы перестали быть абсолютно индивидуальными или что? недавно сидя в канале у художницы я наткнулась на этот пиздец. Ну что, давайте разберём этот пиздец по косточкам. Если это не плагиат, то мне остаётся только пожать плечами и записаться в ряды очевидных совпадений по версии "всё случайно". Автор вто

custom 53324724594488508325custom 53327578815005010543custom 53327726905477407763

26 Feb 2026, 18:51 UTC134 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вся ситуация с новыми одинаковыми Хайп-ами какая-то антиХайп #тейк 🌟 - когда сделают персонажа антихайп рил

custom 53324724594488508324custom 53327578815005010542custom 53326985078726054081custom 53327726905477407761

26 Feb 2026, 18:26 UTC143 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я дурею с того как появляется все больше "идолов музыки". Может и красивые, но не все оригинальные. Пришлось недавно застать ещё не опубликованного ОСа, с неготовой анкетой, но зато со сп*зженной палитрой и идеей аутфита. Некоторые думают, что если ребята неактивные, то и не заметят, как их пытаются скопировать чуваки "под шумок" среди прочих фп. #тейк

custom 53324724594488508326custom 53324412307416385822custom 53327578815005010541

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TechnoLikeOCtriggercf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 398,885 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐓𝐄𝐂𝐇𝐍𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐊𝐄 OC 𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒈𝒆𝒓 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 •°” (@TechnoLikeOCtriggercf), 35 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechnoLikeOCtriggercf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.