Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ ᴍᴀɪɴ ᴄʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ

@Tech_By_LordBarry

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,043subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003904282614
TypeChannel
Username@Tech_By_LordBarry
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tech_By_LordBarry

Growth

1,0371,0431,0409 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,036–1,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:081,043+6
9 Aug 2026, 04:001,037no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:471,037first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.07%
avg views ÷ 1,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.0
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total576
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓813.6%
711.9%
610.2%
👏58.47%
🔥58.47%
🎉46.78%
👎35.08%
💩23.39%
🙉23.39%
🤯23.39%
🥰23.39%
❤‍🔥11.69%
🐳11.69%
👀11.69%
👻11.69%
😍11.69%
😐11.69%
😢11.69%
😨11.69%
😱11.69%
4 further kinds46.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC5 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_Channel

Diverting to grace and stuffs Well, If I had taken any decision that makes you dislike or make me offend you I sincerely apologize, Back on my stuffs now, BarryGpt will be out soonest Thank you all for the support. Support us : @Lord_Barry_Channel - BARRY

👎21

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

8 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC27 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗧

🔥2🤯21🍓1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓2👏1😍1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Let's see what happens by 11PM TONIGHT

🍓2😢1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

7 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Some people celebrate small wins as if they've conquered the world. If getting a virtual number banned is your greatest achievement, congratulations. Talking behind screens and posting for attention doesn't make anyone strong—it only reveals their character. Don't mistake our silence for weakness. We don't waste energy on unnecessary drama, but we do remember actions. Let this be the last time my name or my clan is

2💩1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

A little princess joined my clan, so I removed her. She came into my DMs and spammed until she managed to get my virtual number banned. Then Cinderella started jubilating, called my clan weak, and even posted about it on her channel. Little did she know that actions have consequences. Cinderella, consider this your only warning. Don't mistake calmness for weakness. The next time you try something like this, don't e

🙉2

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

7 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_ChannelPhoto

Well, You all so called idolized qwin grace has just been fucked by Almighty Lord Barry Like I said, I go by action ion do noise After all being said Her next Login won't be available. - BARRY

🍓2🤔1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

7 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC19 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_Channel

Sas my subscribers dey laugh me cuz I dey kneel down 😭😭 Oya normally let's do giveaway 12+ reactions

🎉2👀1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

6 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_ChannelPoll

Who is barry

  1. Well, an aspiring dev19%
  2. Anger issues10%
  3. Weak buh trying to feel among24%
  4. Proud0%
  5. Ai coder14%
  6. Weak yet proud33%
  7. Weak, aspiring to learn14%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🥰1😐1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

6 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_Channel

𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘂𝗽 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸 : https://t.me/Lord_Barry_Backup_Channel

🤝1🤩1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC21 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_ChannelVideo

𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗿𝘆𝗚𝗽𝘁 𝗮𝗽𝗸 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗼𝗻, 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗽 𝗯𝘁𝘄.

2🍓1🐳1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

5 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lord_Barry_ChannelPhoto

𝗪𝗲𝗹𝗹, 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁, 𝗜𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱. 𝗔𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁, 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗴𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆. ------------------------------------------------------------- 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧 𝗙𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗧𝗢 𝗕𝗘 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗘𝗗 -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 2. 𝗜𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 3. 𝗧𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 4. 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲

2👎1🥴1

Signed 🐍 ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ 〖𖣲〗 𝓜𝓡 ۞ ᴅᴇᴠ 🐍

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Tech_By_LordBarry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Who is barry

  1. Well, an aspiring dev19%
  2. Anger issues10%
  3. Weak buh trying to feel among24%
  4. Proud0%
  5. Ai coder14%
  6. Weak yet proud33%
  7. Weak, aspiring to learn14%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 932,335 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ʟᴏʀᴅ ʙᴀʀʀʏ ᴍᴀɪɴ ᴄʜᴀɴɴᴇʟ” (@Tech_By_LordBarry), 1,043 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tech_By_LordBarry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.