Time to come back? π
π―2customΒ 52784675106041606262β1

Channel
@TechSolCooks
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
217subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002368339988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TechSolCooks |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 27 March 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TechSolCooks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 217 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 218 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 218 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 March 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 24 | 36.9% | |
| β€ | 13 | 20.0% | |
| customΒ 5215706742645599766 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| π― | 5 | 7.69% | |
| customΒ 5206607081334906820 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| π₯° | 4 | 6.15% | |
| customΒ 5278467510604160626 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| π | 2 | 3.08% | |
| π€© | 2 | 3.08% | |
| customΒ 5215621964286142449 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| β | 1 | 1.54% | |
| π | 1 | 1.54% | |
| π | 1 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2025 to 9 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Time to come back? π
π―2customΒ 52784675106041606262β1
Photo, posted without a caption
New members eating already π₯±
π₯5π―3π₯°2
Photo, posted without a caption
Nearly 100Xs per day the past week with 43% hit rateβ¦ hmu if u interested, opening 5 spaces ready for a new week of printing π²
π₯4π2
Sticker, posted without a caption
This is what the week looking like
π° π¨π³π·π―π¨βπ πΊπ¬πͺπΉπ¬π» π₯·π½ π Top Callers βπ₯ jayVBlongneck βπ₯ jaydog_techsol βπ₯ KSb_Techsol π Group Stats β Period: 1w β Calls: 227 β Hit Rate: 43% β Median: 66% β Return: 642x (Avg: 2.8x) ππ£ 1 $Downald Β» KSb_Techsol [116x] π₯π 2 $SNARK Β» jaydog_techsol [42.2x] π₯π 3 $mandog Β» ykcerts [30.6x] πΈπ 4 $PNUTDOG Β» jaydog_techsol [27.7x] πΈπ 5 $Rosecoin Β» jayVBlongneck [25.2x] πΈπ 6 $Bucky Β» MillionaireMoβ¦
Should we open up a few spaces in the priv? π
customΒ 52066070813349068204β€2π€©2π₯°2customΒ 52156219642861424491
120Xs now with 52% hit rate still intact π
β€1π₯1
π° π¨π³π·π―π¨βπ πΊπ¬πͺπΉπ¬π» π₯·π½ π Top Callers βπ₯ jaydog_techsol π Group Stats β Period: 1d β Calls: 25 β Hit Rate: 52% β Median: 2.1x β Return: 120x (Avg: 4.8x) π₯π 1 $SNARK Β» jaydog_techsol [42.2x] πΈπ 2 $PNUTDOG Β» jaydog_techsol [27.7x] πΈπ 3 $HBM Β» jaydog_techsol [15.9x] ππ 4 $berto Β» jaydog_techsol [9.7x] ππ 5 $KKKANYE Β» jaydog_techsol [8.8x] ππ 6 $wigglytuff Β» jaydog_techsol [4.5x] ππ 7 $Bruno Β» jβ¦
β€1π₯1
52% hit rate in these market conditions is crazy work
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TechSolCooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ»π¬πͺπ―πΊπΆπ³ πͺπΆπΆπ²πΊ βοΈβ (@TechSolCooks), 217 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechSolCooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.