๐ฌNew Video Makkals ๐ https://youtu.be/DTrrTzrGz4o

Channel
๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐
@TechMagazineYT
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
1,499subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001353386071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TechMagazineYT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TechMagazineYT |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 1,499 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:02 | 1,496 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 1,502 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 1,501 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,499 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 1,500 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 1,505 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,507 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 1,515 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 1,515 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 23 | 31.5% | |
| ๐ฅ | 15 | 20.5% | |
| ๐ข | 13 | 17.8% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 8.22% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 5.48% | |
| โก | 2 | 2.74% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.74% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.74% | |
| ๐ฑ | 2 | 2.74% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 1 | 1.37% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.37% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.37% | |
| ๐ฅฑ | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
๐ฅฒ๐
๐ข5
๐ฌNew Video Makkals ๐ https://youtu.be/nSmf9nMSoQQ
โคโ๐ฅ1๐ฅ1
Unbanned agiruchu makkale but message editing restrict pani vachutagr๐ also solved now
โค2๐ฅ1
Video Varuthuuu๐Makkalyee
Vpn pota use panna mudiyum ๐ญ
โค2
Makkalye Video Panlanu Partee Parta Telegram Ban Panitage Romba Katsama pochu ๐ญ๐ฎโ๐จ
๐ข4
๐ณ๐ข๐คท
๐ข4โก1โค1๐ฅฑ1
๐ฌNew Video Makkals ๐ https://youtu.be/7j1LRG6I7P8
โค1๐ฅ1
๐ฌNew Video Makkals ๐ https://youtu.be/GUbLsVR8LSk
๐ฅ2
๐ฌNew Video Makkals ๐ https://youtu.be/hd0HUtZuGmw
๐ฅ3
๐ฌNew Video Makkals ๐ https://youtu.be/lZOr0kntj1g
โค2๐ฅ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TechMagazineYT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tamil_Love_Songs_Hd_Status ยท 128,947
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 48 here โ alongside 47 others โ read 14 August 2026
@praveensundaram ยท 62,811
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐โ (@TechMagazineYT), 1,499 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechMagazineYT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.