5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,979–4,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 03:44
4,979
-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:01
4,980
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:31
4,981
-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:20
4,982
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:19
4,982
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.0%
avg views ÷ 4,979 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held
20 (29 January 2023 – 15 July 2026)
Views total
1,940
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
578 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
566
97.9%
👎
12
2.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2023 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه نکته رو تو رزومه بچه ها دیدم که خیلی تو ذوق میزنه اینه که تفاوت Programmer، Developer و Engineer رو دقیقا نمی دونن و گاهی جابجا استفاده شون می کنن. این سه تا گرچه خیلی شبیه هستن ولی تو سطح مسئولیت خیلی متفاوت هستن. از همه بالاتر مهندس نرم افزار هست که تقریبا هر کاری می کنه. از طراحی معماری تا پیاده سازی و تست و نگهداری و از همه پایین تر برنامه نویس هست که فقط یه برنامه مینویسه که کار کنه. اینجا توضیح انگلیسیشون رو…
🗒سوالات پرتکرار ویزای جابسیکر اتریش:
1. ویزای جابسیکر چیست و چه مدت اعتبار دارد؟
پاسخ: ویزایی هست که به شما امکان جستجوی کار به مدت 6 ماه در اتریش را می دهد.
2. حداقل امتیاز لازم برای اخذ ویزای جابسیکر چقدر هست؟
پاسخ: حداقل امتیاز لازم طبق جدول امتیاز بندی، 70 امتیاز در حال حاضر می باشد.
3. چه نوع مدرک زبانی نیاز دارم؟
پاسخ : مدارک بین الملی مثل IELTS, Tofel, Doulingo و...
4. حداقل سطح زبان در مدرک بین الملی چقدر…
این ها سوالات مصاحبه ای هست که من برای خودم آماده کردم. سوالات سطح اینترنت هست یا سوالاتی که توی مصاحبه ها ازم پرسیده شده. همینا رو حفظ کنید نصف مصاحبه فنی رو رفتین 😎😊
استک dotNet هست.
#سوال
#interview_questions
#هلند #کاریابی
📌 توضیحاتی در خصوص استخدام از طریق شرکت های واسطه در کشور هلند
(برای شرکت های کوچیکی که مستقیما توانایی اسپانسرشیپ ویزا ندارن):
مقدمه:
بعضی شرکت ها به دلیل سایزشون یا مسائل قانونی قابلیت اسپانسرشیپ ویزا رو برای کارکنان خارجی ندارن. در این شرایط شرکت ها میتونن با کمک یک شرکت واسطه ارائه دهنده خدمات منابع انسانی اسپانسر ویزای کارمند خارجی بشن و با موفقیت جذب رو داشته باشن.
مراحل جذب از این طریق:
1- پر…
#مصاحبه #technical
📌 چطور یک مصاحبه live coding خوب داشته باشم؟
برای این مصاحبه ها خیلی مهمه که دستتون گرم باشه به کد زدن، یک ساختاری تو ذهنتون باشه برای اینکه چجوری میخواید جلو برید توی مصاحبه و واسه خودتون بشکونیدش به بخش های مختلف، واسه این به اصطلاح approach ای که میخواید بکنید به مسئله و مصاحبه ویدیو زیاد هست به عنوان مثال این:
https://youtu.be/DIR_rxusO8Q
سوال ها معمولا دو نوع هستند، یا تمرکزش روی الگوریتم ح…
#مصاحبه #HR
📌 چطور یک مصاحبه HR خوب داشته باشم؟
حتما برید سایت، لینکدین و همه چیز اون شرکت رو بالا پایین کنید + خود جاب دسکریپشن پوزیشن (هرچقدر مهم تره اون شرکته براتون بیشتر باید وقت بزارید) من خودم با این دید میرفتم که اوکی این تنها شرکتیه که ممکنه من بتونم برم توش کار کنم و قرار هم هست از فردا برم اونجا کار کنم، پس تا میتونم باید بشناسمش، بعد اینکه اطلاعات جمع کردید و شناختید، میدونید که یکسری سوال تیپیکال میپرس…
#عمومی #کاریابی
📌 چه راه هایی هست که در لینکدین کار مورد نظرم رو پیدا کنم و چطور روی پوزیشن مورد نظر جاب آلرت تنظیم کنم؟
۱) برای هر حوزه لوکیشن (مثلا آلمان، سوئد، هلند، اروپا) یه سرچ جداگانه داشته باشید.
۲) هر قدر جلو میرید، اگه میبینید یه آگهی هست که هیچ رقمه به شما نمیخوره، ببینید چه کلمات کلیدی داره که تو آگهی مطلوب شما جایی ندارن. مثلا اگه مطمئنید تو آگهیای که به شما بخوره خیلی خیلی بعیده Node.JS باشه، exc…
LinkedIn has recently launched a new feature that will give both the job seeker and hiring team an opportunity to get connected - the fast and easy way.
You can now express interest in working for a company without having to apply for a specific role by using the "I’m interested" button.
You can find this feature on the company’s ABOUT tab on the company page.
Once you've signaled "I'm interested", those hiring at…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TechImmigrants_FAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 200,892 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tech immigrants - FAQ” (@TechImmigrants_FAQ), 4,979 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechImmigrants_FAQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
