Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Teacher Azam

Channel

Teacher Azam

@TeacherAzam

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

42,090subscribers

+3,322 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325746762
TypeChannel
Username@TeacherAzam
DescriptionTEACHER AZAM (Qahramoniy) 👨🏼‍💻 Oʻzimizning chat guruhimiz bor, baʼzi-baʼzida men ham yozib turaman 👉t.me/Teacherazamchat 🚩Instagram: 👉instagram.com/teacherazam ☎️ Englify online maktabim: +998781136969 ☎️ Reklama va taklif uchun: 👉+998 97 831 11 11
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TeacherAzam

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

38,52642,14640,33642,0905 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +3,322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,983–42,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 14:0142,090-35
9 Nov 2026, 04:0042,125-9
7 Nov 2026, 19:4142,134-12
6 Nov 2026, 16:4642,146+52
5 Nov 2026, 18:2742,094+96
4 Nov 2026, 16:5941,998+123
3 Nov 2026, 16:2641,875+38
2 Nov 2026, 14:3041,837+2
1 Nov 2026, 11:0741,835+12
31 Oct 2026, 08:4141,823+20
30 Oct 2026, 05:2841,803+22
29 Oct 2026, 03:3741,781+38
27 Oct 2026, 01:3041,743+29
26 Oct 2026, 02:3841,714+37
25 Oct 2026, 04:0841,677+23
23 Oct 2026, 02:1041,654+94
22 Oct 2026, 03:5841,560+241
20 Oct 2026, 18:4641,319+14
19 Oct 2026, 20:5941,305-13
18 Oct 2026, 20:2041,318first reading

Engagement

173 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 183 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.4%
avg views ÷ 42,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 173 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held173 (27 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total744,800
Reactions total18,773
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 21:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,430
Videos
≈767
Links
≈1,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52m 15s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

51,734 reactions across 169 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16,20331.3%
🔥9,79518.9%
🤣9,68718.7%
👍5,20910.1%
😁4,8819.43%
😱2,4344.70%
👏1,6943.27%
😢9881.91%
🎅8431.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 173 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51,734 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
663
across the posts below
Posts paid on
59
of 169 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
338
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TeacherAzam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 173 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (10.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC≈4,880 views241 reactions3 Starsread 11 November 2026

🎨 Nega ijodkor insonlar har doim ham “produktiv” emas? Ijodkor insonlarning miyasi doimo yangi g‘oyalar, imkoniyatlar va muqobil yechimlar bilan band. Ammo bu xususiyat ba’zan samaradorlikka to‘sqinlik qiladi. G‘oyalar ko‘pligi — bir vaqtning o‘zida bir nechta ishga qiziqish diqqatni tarqatib yuboradi. Perfektsionizm — ideal natijaga intilish ishni yakunlashni qiyinlashtiradi. Overthinking — ishni bajarishdan ko‘…

❤140👍46🔥34😱9😁5🎅3👏3😢1

11 Nov 2026, 04:57 UTC≈7,680 views356 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Nega boshqalarni tezda ayblaymiz-u, oʻzimizga kelganda... Tasavvur qiling, kimdir mashinasini yo‘lning o‘rtasida noto‘g‘ri to‘xtatib qo‘ydi. Darrov: “Qanday mas’uliyatsiz odam!” deb o‘ylaymiz. Ammo o‘zimiz shunday vaziyatga tushsak, bunga shoshilganimiz yoki boshqa sabablar borligini aytamiz. Psixologiyada bu Fundamental Attribution Error deb ataladi. Ya’ni, biz boshqalarning xatti-harakatlarini ko‘proq ularning xa…

🔥217❤76👍42👏10🎅3🤣3😁2😱2

10 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈8,840 views298 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Bu hafta O‘zbekistonda va dunyoda nimalar bo‘ldi? 31-sonda haftaning eng muhim voqealari, shov-shuvli mavzulari va ortidagi savollarni muhokama qilamiz. Siyosat, jamiyat, kutilmagan voqealar va hammamizga ta’sir qiladigan qarorlar — barchasi Hafta Tahlilida. Ko‘ring. Tahlil qiling. O‘z fikringizni bildiring. ⛓Video uchun havola: https://youtu.be/iYtxboEAvuI ✅@TeacherAzam

❤176🔥60👍28🤣19😢6🎅5👏4

9 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC≈10,400 views226 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Xitoy josusi “qarmogʻiga ilingan” NVIDIA rahbari… Dunyodagi eng yirik AI chip ishlab chiqaruvchisi NVIDIA kompaniyasi bosh direktori Jensen Huang atrofida jiddiy mojaro yuzaga keldi. AQSH razvedkasi ma’lumotlariga ko‘ra, Alice Huang ismli biznes rahbari Xitoy maxsus xizmatlari uchun ma’lumot to‘plaganlikda gumon qilinmoqda. U NVIDIA’ning yirik mijozlaridan biri — Singapurdagi Megaspeed kompaniyasida ishlagan va Jen…

❤101🤣70🔥26😱10👏7🎅6👍4😢2

9 Nov 2026, 04:36 UTC≈11,200 views329 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Z avlod vakillari ish topishga qiynalmoqda… So‘nggi paytlarda ish qidirayotgan ko‘plab mutaxassislar va bitiruvchilar o‘z arizalari go‘yo “bo‘shliq”qa singib ketayotgandek his qilishmoqda. ATS tizimlari (Avtomatlashtirilgan saralash): Kompaniyalar rezyumelarni qo‘lda o‘qish o‘rniga SI tizimlariga topshirgan. Natijada siz yetarli tajribaga ega bo‘lsangiz ham, rezyumengizda muayyan kalit so‘zlar (keywords) yetishmaga…

❤174😱49😢40🔥31🤣14👍13🎅6😁2

7 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈12,300 views399 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Nimaga Toshkentda “viloyatlik” deya ajratamiz: “In-group Bias” Toshkent shahrida “viloyatliklar” degan gapni baʼzan eshitamiz. Xoʻsh, bu faqat toshkentliklarga xosmi yoki ilmiy isbotlangan hodisa? Fanda “in-group bias” degan tushuncha bor, yaʼni, oʻzingnikilarga “favorit”lik qilish. Aytaylik, siz qaysidir viloyatdansiz va Toshkentda siz ushbu viloyatdan kimnidir uchratsangiz, unga beixtiyor iliqroq munosabatda boʻl…

❤236👍75👏36🔥30😢8🤣6🎅4😱4

7 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC≈12,800 views231 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Kompaniyalar nega minglab xodimlarini ishdan bo‘shatmoqda? Amazon, Canva, Block, Squarespace va Disney kabi yirik kompaniyalar ommaviy qisqartirishlarni davom ettirmoqda. 2026-yilning dastlabki 10 oyida AQSH texnologiya sektorida 171 mingdan ortiq ish o‘rni qisqartirilgan. Buning sababi …? Kompaniyalar SI yordamida kamroq xodim bilan ko‘proq ish bajarish, xarajatlarni kamaytirish va samaradorlikni oshirishga intilm…

🤣102❤53🔥32😱16😢15👍6🎅5😁2

6 Nov 2026, 15:13 UTC≈13,700 views384 reactions2 Starsread 11 November 2026

Baʼzilar koʻp narsani bilishmasa-da, bilmayman demaydi Hech biror mavzuda juda kam bilimga ega bo‘lsa-da, o‘zini mutaxassisdek tutadigan insonni uchratganmisiz? Qizig‘i, ba’zan aynan shunday odamlar o‘z bilimlariga eng ko‘p ishonishadi. Psixologiyada bu holat Dunning–Kruger effekti deb ataladi. 1999-yilda psixologlar David Dunning va Justin Kruger tomonidan o‘rganilgan ushbu hodisa insonning o‘z bilim va qobiliyat…

🔥238❤76😁28👍16🤣11👏5🎅4😢3

5 Nov 2026, 13:47 UTC≈16,200 views373 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Video

ChatGPT maslahatiga ishonib, vafot etdi. The New York Times jurnalining videoreportajida Bowen Wan ismli ayolning fojiali hikoyasi keltiriladi. U epilepsiya bilan yashagan va ChatGPT bilan yozishmalar davomida shifokorlar nazoratida qabul qilayotgan dorilarini kamaytirish rejasini muhokama qilgan. Chatbot esa uning dori dozasini kamaytirish strategiyasini ishlab chiqishda yordam bergan, hatto bu rejani davom ettiri…

😱237🔥61❤45👍18😢12

5 Nov 2026, 04:46 UTC≈14,400 views415 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

“Tramp hamon sizning prezidentingiz” Oq uy matbuot xizmati oʻzining barcha ijtimoiy tarmoqdagi sahifalarida ushbu fotopostni jamoatchilik uchun eʼlon (public service announcement), deya xabar qildi. Albatta, Tramp hali ham AQSh prezidenti, lekin AQSh Senatini allaqachon Demokratlar 54–44 hisobida egallashdi. Vakillar palatasida ham Demokratlar anchayin yetakchi, 237–139 nisbatda. Bu degani AQSh parlamenti — Kongres…

🔥222😁79❤58🤣22👍20🎅8😱5😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 173 posts we hold for @TeacherAzam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@TeacherAzam edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Poll4,660 voters approx.

Maktabda sizga nisbatan BULLYING bo'lganmi? (qo'rqitish, urish, pulizni olish, muntazam kamsitish, boshqa odamdan xavf his qilishingiz)

  1. Ha, bo'lgan23%
  2. Yo'q, bo'lmagan46%
  3. To'g'risini aytaman, o'zim zo'ravon bo'lganman9%
  4. bir-ikki holatlar, uncha jiddiy emas. Endi shunaqa bo'ladida maktabda23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTCAnonymous Poll4,150 voters approx.

Poliklinikalar uchun DMED tizimga ulanganmisiz? Yani DMED ilovasi bormi sizda?

  1. Ha, men yuklab olganman, foydalanaman15%
  2. Yuklab olganman, lekin foydalanmayman19%
  3. Nima u?69%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTCAnonymous Poll3,690 voters approx.

Sizning uyingiz shahar/tuman kanalizatsiya tarmogʻiga ulanganmi?

  1. Ha46%
  2. Yoʻq36%
  3. Kanalizatsiyani oʻzi yoʻq18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Poll3,510 voters approx.

Siz kanalizatsiyaga nimalarni tashlash mumkin emasligi haqida bilasizmi?

  1. Ha, yaxshi bilaman39%
  2. Qisman bilaman35%
  3. Deyarli bilmayman14%
  4. Umuman bilmayman12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTCAnonymous Poll3,480 voters approx.

Kanalizatsiyadan chiqindilarni yoʻqotish uchun tez-tez foydalanasizmi?

  1. Har doim9%
  2. Onda-sonda25%
  3. Hech qachon65%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Poll3,760 voters approx.

Muddati oʻtgan dorilarni nima qilasiz?

  1. Saqlab qoʻyaman7%
  2. Chiqindiga tashlayman88%
  3. Kanalizatsiyaga tashlayman2%
  4. Izohda yozaman2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Teacher Azam” (@TeacherAzam), 42,090 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TeacherAzam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.