🐦
😁1

Channel
@Tauben_beim_Schach
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001532548523 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tauben_beim_Schach |
| Description | "Mit dummen Menschen zu streiten, ist wie mit einer Taube Schach zu spielen. Egal, wie gut du Schach spielst, die Taube wird alle Figuren umwerfen, auf das Brett kacken und herumstolzieren, als hätte sie gewonnen." PS: Rufmord ist strafbar. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 11 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tauben_beim_Schach |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 18 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 18 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2022 to 20 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐦
😁1
Sehr, sehr lange war es hier still und nun scheint es weiter zu gehen. Komisch, man zieht sich ziemlich zurück und trotzdem bekommt man solch Müll zugesandt. Und die größten Maulaffen von Telegram ganz vorne mit dabei... https://t.me/saschagose
🤣1
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Weiter geht es im Taubenköddel zählen. Rosinen sind grad aus.
🔴Wichtige Mitteilung🔴 Heute Abend ist es wieder soweit. Wir gehen heute wieder Live auf Sendung. 🔴Link zur Radiosendung weiter unten 👇👇👇👇👇 🔴Wir werden die Radiosendung auch wieder hier auf unserem Kanal Live im Sprachchat übertragen. 🔴Uhrzeit: 18 Uhr Es wird wieder eine interessante Radiosendung. 🔴Wichtiges Thema wird wieder Thema Spendenbetrug sein. 👉Hierzu gibt es Neuigkeiten. 🔴👉Weitere Themen in der Radi…
👍1
Diese Kampagnen zielen bewusst darauf ab, dass Menschen sich nicht mehr trauen, sich für andere Menschen in Not einzusetzen. Lasst euch durch so etwas niemals einschüchtern.
👍1
Gab ja nichtmal eine Kontonummer. Selten so etwas Lächerliches gehört. Wundert mich, dass wir nicht auch noch Twitter übernommen haben 😂😂😂
Täubchen Nummer 1 🐦 hat sich seit 25.04.2022 an Patrick Wegner und René Kaiser fest gebissen. Über die "Spendenaffairen" hat sie bisher nichts mehr Neues gebracht oder gefunden.
Taube Nummer 10? Sue Fortruth... 🐦💩 https://t.me/SueFortruth/37174
Es werden langsam mehr.... Fortruth? Für Wahrheit? Wohl irgendwann falsch abgebogen...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tauben_beim_Schach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Tauben_beim_Schach named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tauben beim Schach 🐦♟💩” (@Tauben_beim_Schach), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tauben_beim_Schach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.