Channel
@TaskForce_PPTF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,940subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001702418102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TaskForce_PPTF |
| Created | 4 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TaskForce_PPTF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 1,940 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 1,944 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 1,948 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 1,948 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/d/dereliction-of-duty/
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
GO TELL ON THEM.. get their oath.. and serve them the real one.. to be signed immediately.. serve them the 4 attached.. who do you tell.. once served by a 3rd neutral paarty.. sue them and tell the legislature.. your plan to sue them
https://timothycharlesholmseth.com/exclusive-upon-threat-of-impeachment-10-minnesota-officials-abruptly-swear-oath-to-the-constitution/
Let them call me crazy for my opinions below (they are going to call me crazy anyway so what the heck!!!): 1. I believe the Federal Reserve Bank(s) is unconstitutional and should be abolished. 2. I believe that the amendment providing for an income tax is unconstitutional. 3. I believe our republic should return to the gold standard (I hope we have enough gold soon to do so!!!). 4. I believe our republic should r…
The Flim Flam Flip Flopper Flynntards are birds of a feather who flock together in the disguise of many different names for their feathers. Know them by their fruits. They are ALL anti-Trumpers in disguise. They are masters of deceit. They use Jesus Christ to lure you into their flock. They use patriotism to lure you into their flock. They grift off of you. They spew propaganda against REAL Patriots. They are…
https://www.goshennews.com/news/local_news/ask-the-sheriff-sheriff-explains-the-importance-of-the-oath-of-office/article_d877557a-8af0-5976-b491-a8409887db54.html
Many of you saw, the research done here with regards to the county sheriff's, who WILL NOT defend and UPHOLD the constitution. (the Sheriff is supposed to be the highest form of law in the county, even above the FBI, CIA – ANY OF THEM) 1. this is how our children are being STOLEN and these fake CPS officers who take no oath to the constitution get away with kidnapping.. 2. this is how these people are getting away w…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TaskForce_PPTF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 848,883 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Task Force - PPTF” (@TaskForce_PPTF), 1,940 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TaskForce_PPTF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.