Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TARTARIA 🇩🇪

@TartariaYoutube

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

37,260subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001477270369
TypeChannel
Username@TartariaYoutube
DescriptionOFFIZIELLER Youtube Kanal VEDUNELA https://www.youtube.com/@TartariaYoutube
Created27 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TartariaYoutube

Growth

37,26037,34737,303.56 August 2026 — 37,347 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,347 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,341 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,333 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,326 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,311 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,288 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,281 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,273 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,260 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,247–37,360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:4337,260-13
13 Aug 2026, 15:5837,273-8
12 Aug 2026, 12:1437,281-7
11 Aug 2026, 13:1337,288-23
10 Aug 2026, 11:5737,311-15
9 Aug 2026, 08:4137,326-7
8 Aug 2026, 08:1637,333-8
7 Aug 2026, 09:4637,341-6
6 Aug 2026, 10:0137,347no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5337,347first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 37,260 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,720
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held16 (24 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total8,720
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,900
Videos
1,180
Links
3,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,987 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,51938.1%
👎94923.8%
46811.7%
💯2155.39%
😍1884.72%
🤯1644.11%
🙏1323.31%
👏1192.98%
🤣691.73%
🤨360.903%
💊320.803%
🏆250.627%
😐240.602%
😢180.451%
150.376%
😁110.276%
🤓30.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,987reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TartariaYoutube. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC≈8,720 views184 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026

Lass dich nicht täuschen.

💯96👍44🙏333🤨3😍21👏1

2 May 2026, 07:01 UTC≈30,800 views309 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ein sehr seltsamer Ort, Wau el Namus in der libyschen Wüste TARTARIA🇩🇪

👍20467🏆17😍8👏7🤓3😐3

2 May 2026, 07:01 UTC≈26,800 views269 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Der Schornstein der "Alten Schmiede" (1730), Hafen von Villefranche-sur-Mer, Frankreich TARTARIA🇩🇪

👍147😍5549👏134😁1

2 May 2026, 07:01 UTC≈22,900 views198 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Ein weiteres Beispiel für antike Genialität. Die Ruinen von Ancasmarca sind eine antike archäologische Stätte im Heiligen Tal von Peru, die für ihre Hunderte von runden Steinbauten, die als Kukas bekannt sind, berühmt ist. Diese Gebäude dienten vermutlich als Lager für Mais und andere Nahrungsmittel. TARTARIA🇩🇪

👍12157👏13😍32😐2

26 Apr 2026, 16:43 UTC≈23,600 views251 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Franz Poledne (1873-1932) war ein österreichischer Künstler und Illustrator, der vor allem für seine Ansichten von Wien bekannt ist. "Stefanplatz" TARTARIA🇩🇪

😍11571👏36👍17🏆8💯4

26 Apr 2026, 16:43 UTC≈21,600 views511 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Kannst du die Drehrichtung ändern? Klar!(👍) Es dreht sich nur in eine Richtung, du Aluhutträger!(👎) TARTARIA🇩🇪

👍391🤣45👎4311🤨11🤯7😍2👏1

26 Apr 2026, 16:43 UTC≈18,600 views101 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Künstliche Intelligenz ist Alchemie TARTARIA🇩🇪

🙏56💯24🤯10👎73👍1

26 Apr 2026, 16:20 UTC≈20,000 views187 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Es gibt unzählige Menschen, die Völker und Städte beherrschten; diejenigen, die sich selbst beherrschten, kann man an einer Hand abzählen. Seneca TARTARIA🇩🇪

👍107💯4418🙏16😢2

26 Apr 2026, 16:18 UTC≈17,900 views461 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Für alle Fans von Bills Produkten gibt es mehr erfreuliche Neuigkeiten! Bill Gates unterstützt finanziell das US-Startup SAVOR, das eine neuartige „Butter“ vollständig ohne Kühe oder Pflanzen herstellt. Das Produkt wird mithilfe eines thermochemischen Prozesses direkt aus Kohlendioxid ( ), Wasserstoff und Sauerstoff synthetisiert. TARTARIA🇩🇪

👎321🤯67💊28🤣2312🤨7😐3

26 Apr 2026, 16:13 UTC≈14,900 views146 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Bosnische Polygonalmauerung Der Kern der Sache liegt nicht nur im komplexen Aufbau der Mauerwerksfugen, sondern in der Art der Herstellung der Betonmischung und der Fantasie des Meisters. In Cusco gibt es Blöcke, die wie große Ziegel verlegt wurden, aber direkt daneben in der benachbarten Wand sind Blöcke aus demselben Material mit komplexem Kantenverlauf und kleinen Einsätzen zusammengesetzt. Schaut man sich die Üb

👍11023👏10😍2🙏1

26 Apr 2026, 16:04 UTC≈15,400 views198 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

In den USA wurde eine ernsthafte Untersuchung wegen einer Reihe seltsamer Vorfälle eingeleitet: Seit 2022 sind 11 Wissenschaftler, die mit Weltraum- und Nuklearprogrammen verbunden sind, einschließlich Projekten im Zusammenhang mit der NASA, SpaceX und Blue Origin, gestorben oder verschwunden. Einige wurden getötet, andere begingen Selbstmord, einige verschwanden einfach unter seltsamen Umständen. Die Szenarien des

🤯67👏3726😢16🙏16😐14🤨134

26 Apr 2026, 15:56 UTC≈20,700 views203 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Der giftigste Frosch der Welt ist der Schreckliche Pfeilgiftfrosch (Phyllobates terribilis), auch Goldener Pfeilgiftfrosch genannt. Er lebt in den Regenwäldern an der Pazifikküste Kolumbiens, wird nur ca. 5 cm groß und besitzt genug des Nervengifts Batrachotoxin, um zehn oder mehr erwachsene Menschen zu töten. TARTARIA🇩🇪

👍15916🤯11😁10💊4👎2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TartariaYoutube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Apr 2026, 15:49 UTCAnonymous Poll5,740 voters approx.

Anonyme Umfrage

  1. Ich kenne dieses Symbol nicht.7%
  2. Ich kaufe die Produkte2%
  3. Ich versuche es zu vermeiden35%
  4. Ich boykottiere diese Produkte55%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 98,807 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TARTARIA 🇩🇪” (@TartariaYoutube), 37,260 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TartariaYoutube.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.