Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TARIX АUDIOKURS | FAZLIDDIN BURXONOV

Channel

TARIX АUDIOKURS | FAZLIDDIN BURXONOV

@Tarixaudiokurs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,159subscribers

+1,465 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348294424
TypeChannel
Username@Tarixaudiokurs
Description📕 Amaldagi barcha maktab darsliklarini audiodarsi bilan tinglaysiz. 👂 Tarixni quloqlar yordamida o'rganasiz. ⏰ Audiodarsni eshitish qo'shimcha vaqt talab qilmaydi 👤 Creator: @Fazliddin_Burxonov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tarixaudiokurs

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,45017,25716,353.57 August 2026 — 15,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,681 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,661 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,639 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,624 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,629 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,623 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,616 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,612 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,562 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,546 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,552 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,546 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,544 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,524 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,499 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,495 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,467 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,479 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,489 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,479 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,471 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,461 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,450 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,523 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,649 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,743 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,896 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,959 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,978 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,054 subscribers19 September 2026 — 16,156 subscribers26 September 2026 — 16,373 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,472 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,713 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,825 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,875 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,877 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,915 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,928 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,924 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,923 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,963 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,007 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,029 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,048 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,081 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,090 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,092 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,117 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,152 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,188 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,249 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,257 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,168 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,177 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,171 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,165 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,159 subscribers17,1597 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,179–17,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:5517,159-6
4 Nov 2026, 23:5617,165-6
4 Nov 2026, 01:1117,171-6
2 Nov 2026, 22:1817,177+9
1 Nov 2026, 21:1617,168-89
31 Oct 2026, 22:2117,257+8
30 Oct 2026, 23:1017,249+61
29 Oct 2026, 21:1617,188+36
28 Oct 2026, 20:1917,152+35
27 Oct 2026, 21:3717,117+25
27 Oct 2026, 00:1817,092+2
26 Oct 2026, 03:1917,090+9
25 Oct 2026, 02:0117,081+33
24 Oct 2026, 02:4017,048+19
23 Oct 2026, 02:2717,029+22
21 Oct 2026, 23:4017,007+44
20 Oct 2026, 18:0016,963+40
19 Oct 2026, 17:1816,923-1
18 Oct 2026, 18:5116,924-4
17 Oct 2026, 16:1016,928first reading

Engagement

249 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 17,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,080
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 249 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 52 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held249 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total112,431
Reactions total1,351
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,620
Videos
≈573
Links
≈2,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 50m
Average length
7m 22s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,006 reactions across 232 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,18243.6%
👍1,26225.2%
❤1,03220.6%
😁1513.02%
👏1382.76%
💯641.28%
😭350.699%
👌270.539%
🎉240.479%
⚡160.32%
😘120.24%
🤔120.24%
💔110.22%
🥴100.2%
😍60.12%
🤝60.12%
😎50.1%
🤗50.1%
👎40.08%
🐳20.04%
2 further kinds20.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 235 of the 249 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,006 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 248 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tarixaudiokurs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 249 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (36.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 03:02 UTC664 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#10_sinf_tarix_darsligidan 🫂QATAG‘ONLIK SIYOSATIDA TO‘QIB CHIQARILGAN SIYOSIY ISHLAR: ☑️ "18 lar GURUHI" - Inomjon Hidiraliyev, Muxtorjon Saidjonov, Abdurahim Hojiboyev va b. ☑️ "INOG‘OMOVCHILIK" - O‘zSSR Maorif xalq komissari Rahim Inog‘omov va b. ☑️ "QOSIMOVCHILIK" - O‘zSSR Oliy sudi raisi Sa‘dulla Qosimov va b. ☑️ "BADRIDDINOVCHILIK" - O‘zSRR Oliy sudining prokurori Shamsutdin Badriddinov va b. ☑️ "MILLIY I…

❤3🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 01:13 UTC961 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥12❤2

6 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC992 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ustoz bugungi dars judayam zo'r, bo'ldi, tahlillarga, qo'shimcha ma'lumotlarga boy bo'ldi, birma- bir tushuntirdiz. Aslida har bir darsingiz biz shogirdlaringiz uchun katta maktab desam mubolag'a bo'lmaydi. Chunki sizning darslaringiz shunchaki dars emas.Ha aytgancha rasmli qo'llanmalaringizga umuman gap yuq! Olloh umringizga, risqingizga, ilmingizga baraka bersin. Hammasi uchun rahmat!

🔥6❤1

6 Nov 2026, 00:58 UTC964 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ustoz kompeks dars oʻtishingiz juda zoʻr,oldin bilganimda guruhga allaqachon qoʻshilardim,ilmingiz ziyoda boʻlsin

🔥5

5 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,090 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#hikmatim Shodligimda mendan ham shodsan Sen Yaratgandan mukofotsan Bormi mendek yana omadli Chin do'stim bor qiyomatli Sendan Alloh rozi bo'lsin do'st Xonadoning baxtga to'lsin do'st Qilmading hech xiyonatli Chin do'stim bor qiyomatli P/S: Rahmat hurmatli o'zim! Do'stlarim ko'p Haqiqiysi sensan o'zim! Men ularga haqiqiy do'st bo'lsamda ular menga o'zimdek bo'la olmadi. Afsus.... Sinovlar yohud sinovlarsiz shuncha…

🔥13💔4💯3❤2👍2

5 Nov 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,210 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💚💚💚 💚💚💚 Darsimizdan bugun nimalarni o'rgandiz, Qaysi jihat sizga ko'proq yoqdi? Yozamiz qani erinmay...😍 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

🔥23👍5❤3

5 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,250 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#9_jahon_2024 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

🔥24👏6

5 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,250 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#9_jahon_2024 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

👍16🔥9

5 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,180 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#9_jahon_2024 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

🔥26

5 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,160 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#9_jahon_2024 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

👍28

5 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,170 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#9_jahon_2024 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

👍24

5 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,380 views67 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#9_jahon_2024 🤞@TARIXAUDIOKURS👈

🔥42👍15⚡5👌3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 249 posts we hold for @Tarixaudiokurs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Tarixaudiokurs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @Tarixaudiokurs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz756 voters

Lotin Amerikasida XX asr oxiridan boshlab aholining an’anaviy partiyalarga ishonchi so’nib bordi va buning natijasida XXI asr boshida qaysi mamlakatlarda hokimyatga yangi mustaqil deb atalayotgan nomzodlar keldi?

  1. Braziliya, Venesuela21%
  2. Chili, Ekvador24%
  3. Peru, Boliviya23%
  4. Meksika, Braziliya32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz793 voters

Kubada qachon inqilob ro’y bergan?

  1. 1990-yilda12%
  2. 1994-yilda17%
  3. 1949-yilda19%
  4. 1959-yilda53%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz785 voters

Meksika Shimoliy Amerika erkin zonasiga nechanchi yilda kirdi?

  1. 1992-yilda13%
  2. 1994-yilda49%
  3. 2008-yilda30%
  4. 2010-yilda8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz872 voters

Lotin Amerikasi mamlakatlarida integratsiyalashuv jarayonlari nechanchi asrda kuchaydi?

  1. XX asr boshlarida21%
  2. XXI asr boshlarida35%
  3. XIX asr oxirlarida28%
  4. XX asr oxirlarida17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tarixdan testlar | Bahrom Hikmatov
@Tarixdan_testlar_BH · 36,254
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Tarix Milliy Sertifikat
@Tarix_Milliy_Sertifikatl · 51,493
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
TARIX TILSIMI| Rustamov Sardor
@Tarix_Tilsimi_N1 · 32,430
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗟𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥 | JALOL BOLTAYEV
@TESTLIDER · 23,122
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
TARIXDAN TOMCHI
@tarixdan_tomchi · 68,022
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
TARIX AKADEMIYASI | Shahzod Sattorqulov
@Tarix_Akademiyasi · 21,608
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 October 2026
Tarixdan Quiz Testlar
@Tarixdan_quiz_testlar_kanali · 27,557
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
NASIBA ABDULLAYEVA
@AttestatsiyaNasiba · 151,131
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TARIX АUDIOKURS | FAZLIDDIN BURXONOV” (@Tarixaudiokurs), 17,159 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tarixaudiokurs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.