โโ๐@Target_Neet_UG_2027_2028 @Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors โโ
โค2

Channel
@Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
1,350subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001679124281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 1,350 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 1,353 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,353 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 โ 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,390 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
30 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 29 | 96.7% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
โโ๐@Target_Neet_UG_2027_2028 @Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors โโ
โค2
๐AIIMS Ranking 2026 IIRF(Indian Institutional Ranking Framework)Ranking 2026 โงAIIMS Delhi : 1 โงAIIMS Jodhpur : 8 โงAIIMS Bhubaneswar : 16 โงAIIMS Bhopal : 17 โงAIIMS Rishikesh : 21 โงAIIMS Mangalagiri : 23 โงAIIMS Patna : 25 โงAIIMS Raipur : 26 โงAIIMS RaeBareli : 27 โงAIIMS Nagpur : 28 โงAIIMS Kalyani : 29 โงAIIMS Guwahati : 30 โงAIIMS Deoghar : 31 โงAIIMS Bilaspur : 32 โงAIIMS Gorakhpur : 33 โงAIIMS Bibinagar : Did not achieveโฆ
โค5
๐เฆชเงเฆฐเฆเฆพเฆถเฆฟเฆค เฆนเฆฒเง IIRF(Indian Institutional Ranking Framework)Ranking 2O26 เฆเฆ เฆจเฆเฆฐเง เฆฆเงเฆเง เฆจเฆฟเฆจ เฆญเฆพเฆฐเฆคเฆฌเฆฐเงเฆทเงเฆฐ เฆธเงเฆฐเฆพ เงซเงฆ Medical College เฆเฆฐ เฆฎเฆงเงเฆฏเง West Bengal เฆเฆฐ เฆเฆเฆฟ Medical College เฆเฆเง,เฆเฆฌเฆ เฆคเฆพเฆฆเงเฆฐ Rank เฆเฆคเง : โงMedical College Kolkata : Rank 6 โงR. G. Kar Medical College,Kolkata : Rank 12 โงAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani : Rank 29 โงCalcutta National Medical College,Kolkata : Rank 39
โค4๐1
@Target_Neet_UG_2027_2028 @Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors โโl
โค1
Assertion(a): โBiological speciesโ concept helps to ask how species are formed Reason(r): Concept of biological species is centred around the question of how reproductive isolation comes about
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค1
The correct sequence of taxonomic categories is:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค1
Which one of these categories has real existence?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค1
Compared to genus, which of the following is less general in characters?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โค1
Taxonomic Categories: It depicts the rank or level in the hierarchical arrangement in ascending order. The seven mandatory categories as listed below: Kingdom > Division > Class > Order > Family > Genus > Species โข Kingdom โ includes different phyla of animals and different plant divisions. โข Division/Phylum โ incorporates related classes as a division in plants and phylum in animals โข Class โ Many orders relateโฆ
โค1
The Living World For an organism to be living, there are some features that are imperative. Some of these are: Salient features of living entities: โข Growth โข Reproduction โข Tactile sensation, Ability to sense the environment โข Metabolism โข Self-organize โข Mortality Since all processes occur in the protoplasm, Huxley rightly called it as the physical basis of life. It exhibits all the properties of life, hence it โฆ
โค1
Diversity In Living World โ Biodiversity: Biodiversity refers to the total number and types of organisms found on earth. Terms used as part of the classification are โข Nomenclature โ The process of rendering scientific names to organisms. ICBN and ICZN were advanced to appoint scientific names for plants and animals separately. The scientific name has two segments โ the generic name and specific epithet. This arraโฆ
โค2
Rules for Nomenclature -> Each name has two words โ the genus and the specific epithet -> When expressed, should be independently underlined when written manually and should be italics when printed -> Names should be Latinized or in Latin -> Generic name begins with upper case and the specific name begins with lower case
โค1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which one of these categories has real existence?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Compared to genus, which of the following is less general in characters?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Assertion(a): โBiological speciesโ concept helps to ask how species are formed Reason(r): Concept of biological species is centred around the question of how reproductive isolation comes about
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The correct sequence of taxonomic categories is:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Test your knowledge by answering this MCQ now๐ก The site of glycolysis is ________.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
For conduction heat transfer, the heat energy propagation will be minimal for __________
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 253,526 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโ๏ธ๐๐ก๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ'๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒใ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ฅใ๐ฉบโ (@Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors), 1,350 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Target_Neet_UG_Future_Doctors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.