Channel
@Tarelichkk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001590757846 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tarelichkk |
| Description | Фейхуёвый лимонад это не то же самое, что желание хлебных овечек в майках лдпр организовать тяжелую индустриализацию |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tarelichkk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 101 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 101 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 104 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (11 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,182 |
| Reactions total | 186 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
225 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5906580222509068203 | 65 | 28.9% | |
| custom 5408948565517039279 | 51 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5305305309537927752 | 45 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5310196890741021426 | 45 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5193036230220068853 | 11 | 4.89% | |
| custom 5343958211315653268 | 7 | 3.11% | |
| custom 5292020606324195581 | 1 | 0.444% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
༘♡ Привяу я вспомнила про существование анонимки :] Если вы вдруг хотели о чём-нибудь меня спросить тудымсюдымнаперекосяк или что-нибудь мне написать, то сейчас - самое время Летсгоу https://t.me/hate16pers_anon_bot?start=dMREh6C7bkJYeV9j
custom 59065802225090682035custom 53053053095379277521custom 54089485655170392791
ᨳ᭬♬𓈒ּ֯݁ Персонаж по первым картинкам из поисковика пинтерест!! Уже завершив рисовать её, я поняла, насколько ж сильно я пренебрегла точному соответствию "референсам", но если этого не знать, очень даже хорошо выгодяит #арт
custom 53053053095379277529custom 54089485655170392796custom 59065802225090682036custom 53101968907410214263
🪽🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🪽 Коммишки открыты! Для заказа писать @Tarelichk 🙃
custom 53101968907410214266custom 54089485655170392796custom 59065802225090682036custom 53053053095379277525
Так называемый ребрендинг
custom 59065802225090682036custom 54089485655170392795custom 53101968907410214264custom 53053053095379277521
🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🎠 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Привет, я - Лаутанен! Увлекаюсь рисованием, швейным делом, японской модой и слушаю Мелани Мартинез. Люблю рисовать по разным фандомам, но и про ос своих не забываю 💡 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝐌𝐲 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬 𝑻𝒊𝒌-𝒕𝒐𝒌 @lautanenandherpickles 𝒕𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓 (𝑿) @Tarelichk 𝑰𝒏𝒔𝒕 @Tarelichk 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝐀𝐫𝐭-𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐬 ༘♡ Коммишки ✓ ༘♡ Трейды/коллабы ✓ ༘♡ Мью✓ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝐇𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐬 #арт #коммишен #спидпейнт 🎠🎠🎠🎠🎠
custom 54089485655170392798custom 53053053095379277525custom 59065802225090682034custom 53101968907410214263
Я искренне рада своему выходу из запоя и тому, что теперь без угрызений совести могу постить процессы/скетчи не большими группами и не раз в месяц 💪💪💪 Осталось надеяться и верить, что я смогу сохранить этот ритм
custom 53101968907410214263custom 53053053095379277521custom 59065802225090682031
Не могу подобрать настолько ужасные слова, которые могли бы описать мою ненависть к вот этой кучке бумажек
custom 59065802225090682036custom 53101968907410214265custom 54089485655170392795custom 53053053095379277522
༘♡ Ой, уже 23!! Большое всем спасибо за активность (*´¬`*) Если смотреть очень внимательно, то первый арт и Занку я рисовала по одному принципу, а Эйшу - по другому. Насколько я заметила, "другим" способом с изначальной заливкой всего силуэта работать гораздо легче (да и неудивительно, тк это более популярный метод), плюс так получается "чище" из-за точной четкости линий и границ между цветами. Начиная со следующей??…
custom 53101968907410214264custom 59065802225090682033custom 53053053095379277522custom 54089485655170392792
Давайте наберём 15 реактов на этом посте и я опубликую спидпейнт к этому и прошлому арту :3 А так же я создала новый тт аккаунт чисто под рисовашки, буду благодарна за подписон @lautanenandherpickles
custom 53101968907410214266custom 59065802225090682033custom 54089485655170392792
♡ּ ݁𓈒 𝐇𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐲 𝐅𝐈𝐅𝐀 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐜𝐮𝐩 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞!! #арт
custom 531019689074102142610custom 59065802225090682038custom 53053053095379277527custom 54089485655170392793
#art #oc #Bernadette
custom 53053053095379277522custom 53101968907410214261
Агрессивно заставляю себя рисовать чуть чаще, чем раз в месяц
custom 54089485655170392796custom 59065802225090682035custom 53439582113156532684custom 51930362302200688532custom 53053053095379277522custom 52920206063241955811
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Tarelichkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 764,382 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖧧 Тарелка корненожка” (@Tarelichkk), 101 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tarelichkk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.