Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Taproot Wizards 🧙‍♂️

@TaprootWizards

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,438subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002867736858
TypeChannel
Username@TaprootWizards
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 10 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TaprootWizards

Growth

1,4381,4431,440.57 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,438 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,437–1,444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:311,438-5
7 Aug 2026, 22:021,443no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:261,443first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,099 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 538873927980551396826112.4%
custom 523817568366601239223411.1%
22910.9%
custom 53908292023018129752019.58%
custom 54020756815405710011949.24%
custom 53889699667939497411858.81%
custom 54025621767811543991858.81%
1758.34%
custom 52426258066555705031667.91%
custom 53844813093578017271145.43%
custom 5384550505575907728542.57%
custom 5427042798878610107452.14%
🎉341.62%
custom 5188608638628929611221.05%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,099reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 4 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
94
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TaprootWizards. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2025 to 4 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2025, 16:59 UTC≈2,850 views100 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😎🤑🚀

custom 538873927980551396843custom 540207568154057100122custom 538448130935780172717custom 538896996679394974112custom 540256217678115439942

2 Sept 2025, 16:18 UTC≈2,810 views85 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

it's time to lock in

32custom 538448130935780172724custom 524262580665557050315custom 538455050557590772854custom 53889699667939497414custom 54025621767811543991

28 Aug 2025, 18:40 UTC≈2,610 views75 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

when the fingers touched, something special was created ⚡️

41custom 538873927980551396817custom 53908292023018129759custom 538448130935780172732custom 53889699667939497412custom 54025621767811543991

26 Aug 2025, 22:50 UTC≈2,390 views67 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

great men are not born great, they hodl greatness. 🤑

33custom 540256217678115439915custom 53887392798055139689custom 52426258066555705034custom 538896996679394974141custom 53844813093578017271

19 Aug 2025, 17:08 UTC≈2,390 views85 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin final boss 😎🤑

custom 538448130935780172744custom 538873927980551396822custom 538896996679394974114custom 53908292023018129753custom 54025621767811543992

15 Aug 2025, 17:46 UTC≈2,360 views79 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Strap in! Bitcoin will soon be entering low earth orbit 🌎🤑

custom 539082920230181297536custom 524262580665557050318custom 540207568154057100114custom 54025621767811543994custom 53887392798055139683custom 53889699667939497413custom 53844813093578017271

12 Aug 2025, 21:49 UTC≈2,200 views99 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

It’s Saylor time 🤑⚓️

42custom 538896996679394974129custom 540207568154057100114custom 539082920230181297510custom 53887392798055139683custom 52426258066555705031

8 Aug 2025, 19:15 UTC≈2,560 views122 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

the orange wave is coming 🤑🌊

custom 540256217678115439954custom 54020756815405710012514custom 524262580665557050310custom 53908292023018129759custom 53887392798055139685custom 53844813093578017272custom 53889699667939497412

6 Aug 2025, 18:49 UTC≈2,130 views117 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

the age old question: wen lambo?? 🍔 jump in to find out 😐

custom 538873927980551396853custom 53889699667939497413517custom 540256217678115439992custom 53844813093578017271

4 Aug 2025, 18:43 UTC≈2,130 views91 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

when bitcoin hits $400k, we will be sending Udi to the moon 🌕

42custom 51886086386289296112212custom 53887392798055139688custom 53908292023018129753custom 53889699667939497412custom 54020756815405710012

1 Aug 2025, 18:58 UTC≈2,150 views85 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

enjoy the weekend trench warriors! 😎

custom 538873927980551396838custom 540256217678115439917custom 538448130935780172713custom 52426258066555705037custom 53845505055759077286custom 53889699667939497413custom 53908292023018129751

31 Jul 2025, 17:12 UTC≈2,190 views128 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

clean head, full bags, can't lose 🚿

custom 539082920230181297548custom 524262580665557050338custom 53889699667939497412410custom 538873927980551396861custom 54025621767811543991

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TaprootWizards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 673,944 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Taproot Wizards 🧙‍♂️” (@TaprootWizards), 1,438 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TaprootWizards.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.