Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Enot LIVE - Humor & News

@TapEnot

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

299,703subscribers

-4,092 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150189784
TypeChannel
Username@TapEnot
DescriptionНовости финансов, криптовалют, игр, коды, комбо, подсказки. Связаться - @WmzLv Чат/Chat - https://t.me/TapGF Голосовать/Boost - https://t.me/boost/TapEnot #news #finance #crypto #gamefi #game #ai #avots #humor #gpt #chatgpt
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TapEnot

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

617 average views per post against 299,703 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.206%. Across the 2,317 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,026–316,057 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.37% and 21.5%, with a median of 10.3%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured43 of 45 published in the window (43 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled26,549
Mature posts only0.226% over 38 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers299,703 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,317 channels · p10 2.03% · p25 4.37% · p50 10.3% · p75 21.5% · p90 35.4%
Position in cohort0.864th percentile · 1/50 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.096% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

299,703303,795301,7496 August 2026 — 303,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 303,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 303,419 subscribers7 August 2026 — 302,769 subscribers8 August 2026 — 302,181 subscribers9 August 2026 — 301,655 subscribers10 August 2026 — 300,954 subscribers11 August 2026 — 300,313 subscribers12 August 2026 — 299,703 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4,092. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 299,089–304,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:34299,703-610
11 Aug 2026, 22:12300,313-641
10 Aug 2026, 21:43300,954-701
9 Aug 2026, 18:41301,655-526
8 Aug 2026, 19:51302,181-588
7 Aug 2026, 20:01302,769-650
6 Aug 2026, 19:48303,419-376
6 Aug 2026, 01:30303,795no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:17303,795first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.217%
avg views ÷ 299,703 subscribers
Avg views / post
651
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.559%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held45 (27 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total28,003
Reactions total142
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,650
Videos
410
Links
7,590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 36 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3929.5%
👍3526.5%
🤩1612.1%
1410.6%
🐳1410.6%
😁1410.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
8.89%
4 of 45 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
684
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
664
over 39 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC331 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

🖤 avots Studio Сделано в avots Studio: AI-видео из текста: модель на подиуме. 40+ ИИ-моделей и Studio в одном месте: фото-эффекты, видео, аватары, музыка, чат. 🎁 Регистрируйся по ссылке и получи +500 токенов бонусом при первой подписке: Сайт: https://avots.ai/welcome/Q2anEmto?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=autopost_ref Бот: https://t.me/avotsaibot?start=ref_Q2anEmto #avotsapp #avots #нейросеть #

Signed Avots Ai

12 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC350 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Что-то со шрифтами не так 😁

🐳1👍1🔥1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

12 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC444 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Проверяем зрение 😁

😁2👍1🔥1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

12 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC444 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Твёрдо и чётко 😀 ✈️ Подпишись - Енот LIVE #юмор #мем

👍1🔥1🤩1😁1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

12 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC455 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🖤 Флакон на камне Сделано рекламное фото флакона духов на камне с брызгами воды. 40+ ИИ-моделей и Studio в одном месте: фото-эффекты, видео, аватары, музыка, чат. 🎁 Регистрируйся по ссылке и получи +500 токенов бонусом при первой подписке: Сайт: https://avots.ai/welcome/Q2anEmto?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=autopost_ref Бот: https://t.me/avotsaibot?start=ref_Q2anEmto #avotsapp #avots #нейросет

1👍1🔥1

Signed Avots Ai

11 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC616 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Бедняга, на что только не пойдешь ради вкусняшки ✈️ Подпишись - Енот LIVE #юмор #мем #панда

🔥21🐳1👍1😁1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

11 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC646 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Так что за песня? ✈️ Подпишись - Енот LIVE #юмор #мем #песня

2😁2👍1🔥1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

11 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC616 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🖤 avots Studio Сделано в avots Studio: AI-видео из текста: котёнок играет с клубком. 40+ ИИ-моделей и Studio в одном месте: фото-эффекты, видео, аватары, музыка, чат. 🎁 Регистрируйся по ссылке и получи +500 токенов бонусом при первой подписке: Сайт: https://avots.ai/welcome/Q2anEmto?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=autopost_ref Бот: https://t.me/avotsaibot?start=ref_Q2anEmto #avotsapp #avots #нейр

1🐳1🔥1😁1

Signed Avots Ai

11 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC609 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

На самом деле, чё отказывается ✈️ Подпишись - Енот LIVE #юмор #мем

1👍1🔥1😁1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

11 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC635 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🖤 Дракон над горами Сгенерирован фэнтези-арт с драконом, парящим над заснеженными горами. 40+ ИИ-моделей и Studio в одном месте: фото-эффекты, видео, аватары, музыка, чат. 🎁 Регистрируйся по ссылке и получи +500 токенов бонусом при первой подписке: Сайт: https://avots.ai/welcome/Q2anEmto?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=autopost_ref Бот: https://t.me/avotsaibot?start=ref_Q2anEmto #avotsapp #avots

🔥21👍1

Signed Avots Ai

10 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC696 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Когда не как все ✈️ Подпишись - Енот LIVE #юмор #мем

👍21🐳1😁1

Signed Сергей (WmzLv)

10 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC664 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🖤 avots Studio Сделано в avots Studio: AI-видео из текста: ночной город, таймлапс. 40+ ИИ-моделей и Studio в одном месте: фото-эффекты, видео, аватары, музыка, чат. 🎁 Регистрируйся по ссылке и получи +500 токенов бонусом при первой подписке: Сайт: https://avots.ai/welcome/Q2anEmto?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=autopost_ref Бот: https://t.me/avotsaibot?start=ref_Q2anEmto #avotsapp #avots #нейрос

👍1🔥1🤩1

Signed Avots Ai

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @TapEnot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,001,837 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

avots.ai22 posts · 27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
cryptosummit.ru1 post · 31 July 2026 – 31 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Enot LIVE - Humor & News” (@TapEnot), 299,703 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TapEnot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.