9 measurements spanning 10 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,425–11,479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 19:44
11,431
-12
16 Aug 2026, 14:16
11,443
-7
15 Aug 2026, 00:13
11,450
-4
11 Aug 2026, 17:05
11,454
-6
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
11,460
-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
11,462
-1
8 Aug 2026, 14:22
11,463
-10
7 Aug 2026, 11:45
11,473
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:38
11,473
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
276
Videos
246
Links
46
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 41s
Average length
2m 34s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,516 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,744
69.3%
👍
332
13.2%
💔
208
8.27%
👌
82
3.26%
😢
54
2.15%
👏
36
1.43%
🔥
35
1.39%
😡
23
0.914%
😱
1
0.04%
🥰
1
0.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tamimbarghouti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2025 to 19 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
إسرائيل تريد الدمار للجميع، تريد الدمار لمن تراه تهديداً وجودياً وعدواً خالصاً، وتريد الدمار لمن تطمع في وراثته كمركز تجاري في المنطقة حتى ولو كان صديقاً لها ومن دعاة الديانة الإبراهيمية واتفاقيات السلام والتطبيع،وتريد الدمار طبعاً للوطني المتبني قضايا أمته والراعي لها بما ملكت يده، وتريد الدمار لمن تخاف غناه وتريد الدمار لمن تخاف فقره، شنت إسرائيل هذا العدوان ليخسر الجميع إلا هي، فالصواب أن يعمل الجميع معاً لكي لا …
تكرار: إسرائيل اعتداء على الحق الشخصي لكل فلسطيني ولذلك فإن من يقاومها لا يحتاج إذناً ولا تفويضاً لأنه يمارس حقه الطبيعي في الدفاع عن نفسه وعن أملاكه ضد عصابة سطو مسلح لها علم وبرلمان، أما من أراد مسالمتها أو الاعتراف بها باسم ضحاياها من الشعب الفلسطيني فهو الذي يعتدي على حقوق سواه إذ ليس لأي حكومة او قيادة أو فئة من الفلسطينيين أن تتنازل عن الحقوق الشخصية الفردية لسواها من سائرهم، وليس لأي جهة، ولا حتى لمنظمة التحري…
عملت في الأمم المتحدة ضابط حقوق إنسان في بعثتها في السودان، وكانت جرائم ما يسمى بالجنجويد تصلني يومياً من مراقبينا في الفاشر ونيالا والجنينة عواصم أقاليم دارفور الثلاث، وكان كثير منها يقع عند منابع المياه والآبار حيث تستهدف النساء الذاهبات لسقاية أسرهن، اقول في ذلك الوقت كانت الحكومة السودانية تستخدم الجنجويد، وهم من سيعرفون لاحقاً بقوات الدعم السريع، لمواجهة معارضيها، فانقلب عليها من استعانت بهم، وها إنت تراهم حلفا…
الصراحة أنا عملت أستاذاً للعلوم السياسية في أكثر من جامعة في الولايات المتحدة وألمانيا ومصر، نعم مثل ما جرى في الفاشر يدرّس في الجامعات، لكن المواد التي يدرّس تحتها لن تعجب سيادة الجنرال، يدرس تحت بند جرائم الحرب والجرائم ضد الإنسانية، والنظم القمعية، والتطهير العرقي وتضرب به الأمثال صراحة يا أستاذ حميدتي
#الفاشر
منطق كل اتفاقيات السلام من كامب ديفيد إلى هذه، انسحاب اسرائيلي تدريجي (عادة ما يكون على ثلاث مراحل، ألف وباء وجيم كما في سيناء ثم في الضفة والآن في غزة مع بقاء منطقة منزوعة السلاح تماماً …مقابل ترتيبات تحفظ أمن إسرائيل)… وفي كل مرة يثبت الناس أنهم، بمجرد وجودهم، خطر وجودي على إسرائيل وأن كل هذه الترتيبات لا تكفي ليشعر الوافدون الغزاة السارقون أملاكنا ودورنا وحقولنا وزيتوننا بالأمان…الخطة الاستعمارية هي التأجيل بعد ال…
نتنياهو يقول إن القوة الدولية في غزة يجب أن تتكون من الدول التي "ترتاح إسرائيل لها"… طيب، أي قوة ترتاح لها إسرائيل لن ترتاح لها المقاومة، وأي قوة لا ترتاح لها المقاومة قوة احتلال، وما لم تقدر عليه إسرائيل لن يقدر عليه من ترتاح لهم إسرائيل من حلفائها، وسيتعامل الفلسطينيون مع هؤلاء كقوة احتلال بديلة عميلة … والسلام…
#غزة
هي ذات القصة، انتظار نجدة تتأخر، يلوم المتأخر المتعجل ويلوم المتعجل المتأخر والنتيجة أننا لا نقاتل معاً… قلت إن تحريرها كلها ممكن، وأنا عند قولي، اليوم كما أمس، وقلت ممكن إن لم يخذل بعضنا بعضاً وأنا عند قولي، وقلت إن خذل بعضنا بعضا ً فسيكون الخاذل أسوأ حالاً من المخذول وأنا عند قولي، وأقول إن تحريرها بدأ إذا واجهنا العدو معاً وأنا عند قولي، وقلت إن تحريرها اقترب إذا دخل الإقليم الحرب الشاملة التي يرفض بعناد مضن وممض…
طيب من الآن، وأياً كانت ما تأتي به الأيام من حرب وسلم، فلسطين كلها من البحر للنهر حق لنا نحن أهلها وأبناء أهلها ولا يمكن قصرها على أتباع رواية دينية دون غيرها ودون غيرهم وهم غزاة وافدون أتى بهم غزاة وافدون، أي تقسيم لفلسطين سيحتج به العالم علينا وسيقولون إنه لم يبق بين أهل البلاد من يطالب بها كلها، فلسطين كلها للمولودين فيها والمولودين آباؤهم وآباء آبائهم فيها لمئات السنين، لا لمهاجرين غير شرعيين أدخلتهم سلطة غزو غ…
❤120👌16🔥11👍10👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Tamimbarghouti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 809,695 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تميم البرغوثي” (@Tamimbarghouti), 11,431 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tamimbarghouti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
