Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 18 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,971–17,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 07:59
16,986
+7
7 Sept 2026, 01:57
16,979
-6
4 Sept 2026, 10:21
16,985
-9
2 Sept 2026, 19:33
16,994
-2
1 Sept 2026, 21:06
16,996
-3
31 Aug 2026, 17:56
16,999
+7
30 Aug 2026, 20:29
16,992
-17
29 Aug 2026, 17:36
17,009
-9
28 Aug 2026, 15:11
17,018
-5
27 Aug 2026, 11:53
17,023
-10
26 Aug 2026, 08:26
17,033
+13
25 Aug 2026, 04:54
17,020
-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:39
17,021
-11
23 Aug 2026, 04:30
17,032
no change
23 Aug 2026, 04:15
17,032
first reading
Engagement
162 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.90%
avg views ÷ 16,986 subscribers
Avg views / post
662
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.159%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
162
of 162 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 154 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
162 (19 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
101,888
Reactions total
40
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
40 reactions across 31 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33
82.5%
👍
7
17.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Balu Forge acquires ring rolling pProduction lines
Balu Forge Industries has announced the successful acquisition of a state-of-the-art ring rolling production line capable of producing forged rings up to 6.7 meters in Outer Diameter (OD).
Balu Forge Industries was quoting at Rs 598.90, up Rs 20.55, or 3.55 percent.
It has touched an intraday high of Rs 619.95 and an intraday low of Rs 586.25.
It was trading with vol…
Power Grid receives LoI for Rs 3,244 crore Rajasthan-Maharashtra transmission project
The company has received a Letter of Intent (LoI) for an inter-state transmission system project for the evacuation of power from Rajasthan REZ Phase-IV on a build, own, operate and transfer (BOOT) basis, at quoted annual transmission charges of Rs 3,244.33 crore.
The project comprises the establishment of 6,000 MW ±800 kV HVDC term…
Citi initiates Buy on RBL Bank, target price at Rs 440
#1 RBL leveraged promoter’s Emirates NBD relationship to unlock large pool of UAE FCNR(B) deposits
#2 Mobilised Rs 32,472 crore of gross FCNR(B) deposits under RBI swap facility
#3 FCNR(B) deposits equal 26% of total deposits, 37% of term deposits and 2.7% FCNR(B) market share
#4 Haul is significant for a mid-sized bank versus >0.5% systemic deposit share
#5 FY27…
Investec upgrades Torrent Power to 'buy', target Rs 1,515
Torrent Power was quoting at Rs 1,314.35, up Rs 64.65, or 5.17 percent.
It has touched an intraday high of Rs 1,323.00 and an intraday low of Rs 1,270.20.
It was trading with volumes of 112,704 shares, compared to its five day average of 137,480 shares, a decrease of -18.02 percent.
Multi Commodity Exchange of India shares fall 2.31% in today's trade
Multi Commodity Exchange of India shares fall 2.31% to Rs 3,210.00 in today's trade.
Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone shares rise by 2.06% in today's trade
Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone shares rise 2.06% to Rs 1,707.20 in today's trade.
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @TamilTradersZoneSaranya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tamil Share @tamilshare1 · 47,671 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
SEBI Regd Research Analyst 🚀 FlyingCalls Free Market Alerts 🚀 @FlyingcallsArjun · 58,248 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tamil Traders Zone ™” (@TamilTradersZoneSaranya), 16,986 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TamilTradersZoneSaranya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.