Posted without readable text
custom 51905489931841429993custom 51906440150405981373custom 51907300604154071993

Channel
@TamiKisser007n7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
485subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003316312214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TamiKisser007n7 |
| Created | 27 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TamiKisser007n7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 485 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 485 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 27 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (27 November 2025 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 453 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3,294 reactions across 8 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5440864785321193109 | 400 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5276125061210742822 | 373 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5276024043579937530 | 351 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5283159152489694443 | 339 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5206666454962834107 | 307 | 9.32% | |
| custom 5321242344035488347 | 284 | 8.62% | |
| custom 5332773721339884311 | 229 | 6.95% | |
| custom 5321310569590979503 | 226 | 6.86% | |
| custom 5278585970097165733 | 178 | 5.40% | |
| custom 5276027097301685763 | 121 | 3.67% | |
| custom 5330367603351260494 | 111 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5262955312796704816 | 97 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5332499393188765423 | 57 | 1.73% | |
| custom 5242377626265359611 | 47 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5249419212262248226 | 47 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5255748529472706254 | 47 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5256223707474465940 | 46 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5190730060415407199 | 12 | 0.364% | |
| custom 5190548993184142999 | 11 | 0.334% | |
| custom 5190644015040598137 | 11 | 0.334% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,294reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TamiKisser007n7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 November 2025 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 51905489931841429993custom 51906440150405981373custom 51907300604154071993
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 51906440150405981372custom 51905489931841429991custom 51907300604154071991
Posted without readable text
custom 51907300604154071997custom 51905489931841429996custom 51906440150405981376
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 51905489931841429991custom 51907300604154071991
File, posted without a caption
custom 5321242344035488347174custom 5330367603351260494111custom 526295531279670481697custom 533277372133988431148custom 524237762626535961147custom 524941921226224822647custom 525574852947270625447custom 532131056959097950347
🪦⭐꛱⃜ ֤֫͝𐔌⃪𑌼ֳֻ֦֧ۣ֮֫ؖ፝͡ ̸ּྀ ゙ᷓ𝄂ֵᩛᩧ᷒ᰰຼ⃘░⃪⃨⃔𑂴 ֫֝ ࡙᳟꛱⃜😎℘֥ ִ֦֤ ⃟🌟🌟🌟🐾 ⃟ּ֤֤֝֞̋̋᪰᪰ ֥֜ ̸̸⵿⃨⃨᩻᷍᷍᷍ ೀ𑂹ֲ֜ܶꥋꥋ᷍᷍ꥋⵓ ֤֪֗ ֦֤֢֞֬֞🎀𓏵֤֫͝ ゙⵿̼࣯᷼͟⃝゙⃞͠◡ ♟⭐ ⁞̢̔⸽ֲ֥֥֠ ּ֤֣֧֟֬֟֫֝ ְ ⠀⃟֫֜ ̶͠𝝪ⵔ꤭𑀺̴ꨮᰰᩙ⃜U𝗥ꤩ̈ ⵔ꯭᪶̄͡᷍͠𝗣⃜ᰰᩙꨮȊ᳕ᯩᯩ𝖭𑀼͊𐨆ֿؗ𑀺Iⵔֿؗ𐨆͊𑀼𝖭۪۪࣮𑣩̥ۖ͜𑣨꤭⃜ꨮ𑄈⃪ܻ۫░݀۬ᩨꥋ꯭⃜⃜ᰰᩙ❤️𖢷ᩙᰰ᳕♡゙̼᭢ׅ݃⁞❫🤍🫳
custom 5276024043579937530241custom 5206666454962834107152custom 5276125061210742822137custom 533277372133988431170custom 544086478532119310970custom 528315915248969444369custom 527602709730168576368custom 527858597009716573368
Лав лист @ Богиня кьючан💀 @ иррей @мимчи
custom 5440864785321193109181custom 5276125061210742822118custom 520666645496283410797custom 527602404357993753053custom 527602709730168576353custom 532131056959097950353custom 533277372133988431153custom 527858597009716573352
ㅤㅤ𓐇᳟˚ִִ𓈒 ֧۫֫𓏴🥩𓏴᳟ 𝝪ܵۜ᷍𝗈ꪾ𐨁⵿𝘂ׄ𐨁𝆬⃝ 𝗿 c𝗮ׄꨬ𝘁 𝗶ᩞܵۜ𝗌ׄ 𝖽𐨁□𝗮ׄ𝖽, 𝘁𝗿⵿ܵۜყ 𝘁⃔𝗈⵿ 𝗮ׄcᩞc𝗲࣪𝗉⵿⃔□ 𝘁һᩞ⵿᷍𝗮ׄ𝘁 ƒܵۜ□᷍c𝘁ꘓܻܶ𝆬⃝
custom 5283159152489694443218custom 5440864785321193109149custom 5276125061210742822118custom 520666645496283410758custom 527858597009716573358custom 532124234403548834758custom 532131056959097950358custom 533277372133988431158
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @TamiKisser007n7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 900,622 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤㅤ ꒢᷼ᑎ” (@TamiKisser007n7), 485 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TamiKisser007n7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.