Channel
@TakyaTalabaniSonjagh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,225subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001085176488 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TakyaTalabaniSonjagh |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 1,225 | +7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 1,218 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 1,218 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:33 | 1,219 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 1,221 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,211 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 1,210 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,205 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 1,198 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 1,202 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,203 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 1,202 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 September 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,310 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
به نام ایزد یکتا درست نویسی. به این جمله ها نگاه کنید: الف: آنها از روزگار" قدیم" تا امروز، هوادار شما هستند. ب: آنها از روزگار " کهن" تا امروز، هوادار شما هستند. " قدیم": واژه ای عربی بر وزن" فعیل" از ریشه ی " قدم" که وارد زبان فارسی شده است. از این ریشه، واژه هایی مانند: قدما، قدیمی و ... برآمده است. برابر فارسی واژه ی عربی " قدیم": کهن، گذشته. ننویسیم: قدیم بنویسیم: کهن، گذشته بنابراین در نمونه های بالا، جمله" …
❇️#شگفتیهای_علمی_و_قرآنی_خلقت در بدن انسان 🔸اگر دندانهای ما یک تکه استخوان بود چه میشد؟ 🕌: @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh
🎙خطبه جمعه:👆👆👆 📝موضوع خطبه درباره:👇👇👇 ⚠️ تعریف و تمجید از شخصیت مبارک حضرت محمد صلی الله علیه وسلم از زبان روشنفکران،متفکران،سیاستمداران،نویسندگان،دانشمندان وشاعران غربی ومستشرقین‼️ ⚠️خداوند جل جلاله چگونه حضرت را در قرآن معرفی کردند⁉️ ⚠️آیا واقعا ما مسلمانان، پیامبر بزرگوار صلی الله علیه وسلم را آنچنان که شایسته وبایسته شخصیت ایشان است، میشناسیم⁉️ 🗣لطفا با دقت به این خطبه گوش جان فرا دهید که همه نکات آن ظریف…
#_با_حافظ 📖 واعظان کاین جلوه در محراب و منبر میکنند چون به خلوت میروند آن کار دیگر میکنند مشکلی دارم ز دانشمند مجلس بازپرس توبه فرمایان چرا خود توبه کمتر میکنند گوییا باور نمیدارند روز داوری کاین همه قلب و دغل در کار داور میکنند! حافظ و مدعیان فضیلت روایتی از ریا، قدرت و آزادی در دیوان حافظ #امید_اطهرینژاد 🕌: @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh
چگونه ممکن است که آدم ها هنگام بحث فقط در پی پیروزی باشند و به حقیقت اعتنا نکنند؟ شوپنهاور می گوید: به سادگی، این دنائت فطری بشری است. این امر نتیجه ی این واقعیت است که مردم پیش از سخن گفتن، فکر نمی کنند بلکه پرحرف و فریبکارند. آن ها به سرعت موضعی اختیار می کنند و از آن پس، فارغ از درستی و نادرستی آن موضع، صرفا به خاطر غرور و خودرأیی به آن می چسبند. نخوت همیشه بر حقیقت غالب است! 📚هنر همیشه بر حق بودن ✍آرتور شو…
✨ کارت، باید از دلت بگذره 🕯️ #قاعدهی #بیستم از چهل قاعدهی شمس تبریزی: شایستهست هر کاری انجام میدیم به آن عمیقاً باور داشته باشیم و با تمام وجود و احساسمون مشغولش بشیم. اگه مطربیم باید عاشق باشیم؛ اگه مداحیم باید دردمند باشیم. وگرنه به کاری که میکنیم ادای دین نکردیم و تأثیر بایستهای روی جانها نذاشتیم. کار بدون دل، فقط تکرار حرکته، نه خلق تأثیر. ✨ #اندیشیدن به #پایان #راه کاری #بیهوده است. #وظیفه تو…
❤1
آن نفسی که باخودی یار چو خار آیدت وان نفسی که بیخودی یار چه کار آیدت آن نفسی که باخودی خود تو شکار پشهای وان نفسی که بیخودی پیل شکار آیدت آن نفسی که باخودی بستهٔ ابر غصهای وان نفسی که بیخودی مه به کنار آیدت آن نفسی که باخودی یار کناره میکند وان نفسی که بیخودی بادهٔ یار آیدت آن نفسی که باخودی همچو خزان فسردهای وان نفسی که بیخودی دی چو بهار آیدت جملهٔ بیقراریت از طلب قرار توست طالب بیقرار شو تا که قرار آیدت …
#یاهو. 🕌#تکیه_نجار_میعادگاه_عاشقان_و_عارفان 📹تهیه و فیلم برداری: #بابک_رحیمی 🎞️کیفیت :HD(کیفیت خوب) ⏰زمان: ۱۱:۲۵دقیقه 📆تاریخ : جمعه ۱۴۰۴/۸/۲۳ 🕌: @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh
❤1
🕌: @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh
خدا نه این است که ما می پرستیم، این خدایی است که ما آن را خلق کرده ایم؛ نه خدایی که ما را خلق کرده است پس، راه نه این است که ما می رویم راه، راهی دیگر است و رهرو، رهرويی دیگر شيخ حسن خرقانی 🕌: @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh
صفحه #۷ ----------#و_شیخ_مرا_گفت ......ادامه از ص۶ - هر عیش که به غیر حق بود دیر نپاید و خراب شود لیک آن خوشی که به وی در بود ، آن پاید و ماند و هرگز نقصان نیاورد! 🥀شیخ را پرسیدم : در اصل شکر که باید گفت !؟ ♡ و او پاسخ داد : اصل اصل شکر ، شکر بود حق تعالی بود و شکر آن یقین که تو را وادید آمده به حضرت وی ! و شکر آن رخصت که بدو بیندیشی و خیالش دلت را مست و بی تاب کند. 🥀شیخ را پرسیدم : که چگونه در طریقت رجوع به ح…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TakyaTalabaniSonjagh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌙تکیه سنجاق🌙طریقة قادریة طالبانیة” (@TakyaTalabaniSonjagh), 1,225 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TakyaTalabaniSonjagh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.