Channel
@Tahlil_Nameh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,963subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001324925000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tahlil_Nameh |
| Created | 27 June 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tahlil_Nameh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,963 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 1,961 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 1,963 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 1,962 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 1,953 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 1,953 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 27 June 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (27 June 2019 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,278 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
48 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2019 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ابلاغیه جدید سازمان بورس سازمان بورس از شرکتهای بورسی و فرابورسی خواست جزئیات هزینههای مسئولیت اجتماعی سال ۱۴۰۴ و برنامههای سال ۱۴۰۵ را با هدف افزایش شفافیت، در سامانه کدال افشا کنند. مهلت انتشار اطلاعات: ۱۹ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ @Tahlil_Nameh
❤3
📊 #وپست نگاهی به یک سهم ارزنده در گروه بانکی از نمادهای گروه بانکی با سیاست تقسیم سود مناسب. بخش عمده سودآوری شرکت از محل فعالیتهای عملیاتی بوده و قابلیت تکرار در دورههای آتی را دارد. 🗓 منبع تحلیل : محمد رضا توکلی @Tahlil_Nameh
❤3
📑 تحلیل بنیادی #وپست 🏢 ارزش بازار: 44 همت 📶 سهام شناور: 37 ٪ 💵 آخرین درصد تقسیم سود: 60 ٪ 💰 قیمت روز: 893 تومان 📈 برآورد EPS سال 1405 : 285 تومان 📊 نسبت P/E پیشرو: 3.1 🗓 منبع تحلیل : محمد رضا توکلی @Tahlil_Nameh
❤2
📊 #ددانا همچنان ارزنده است؟ با توجه به رشد قیمت و بازدهی اخیر این سهم، نسبت P/E پیشرو آن به حدود ۴.۵ واحد رسیده است. 📈 در این محدوده، همچنان نمیتوان گفت سهم غیرارزنده شده است؛ اما نسبت به قیمتهای پایینتر، حاشیه امن سرمایهگذاری کاهش یافته و بهتر است با احتیاط بیشتری نسبت به خرید یا افزایش موقعیت تصمیمگیری شود. 🗓 منبع تحلیل : کارگزاری ملی ایران @Tahlil_Nameh
❤2
📑 تحلیل بنیادی #ددانا 🏢 ارزش بازار: 23.4 همت 📶 سهام شناور: 10 ٪ 💵 آخرین درصد تقسیم سود: 75 ٪ 💰 قیمت روز: 1628 تومان 📈 برآورد EPS سال 1405 : 358 تومان 📊 نسبت P/E پیشرو: 4.5 🗓 منبع تحلیل : کارگزاری ملی ایران @Tahlil_Nameh
❤2
📊 ارزنده مثل #فسپا صورت سود و زیان تاریخی و برآوردی شرکت در تصویر بالا قابل مشاهده است. 📈 بر اساس این تحلیل، نسبت P/E پیشرو شرکت حدود ۲.۵ برآورد شده که در صورت تحقق سودهای پیشبینیشده، نشاندهنده ارزندگی سهم است. 🗓 منبع تحلیل: کارگزاری بانک آینده @Tahlil_Nameh
❤5
📑 تحلیل بنیادی #فسپا 🏢 ارزش بازار: 5.64 همت 📶 سهام شناور:32 ٪ 💵 آخرین درصد تقسیم سود: 52 ٪ 💰 قیمت روز: 451 تومان 📈 برآورد EPS سال 1405 : 181 تومان 📊 نسبت P/E پیشرو: 2.5 🗓 منبع تحلیل : کارگزاری بانک آینده @Tahlil_Nameh
❤4
#فملی صورت سود و زیان تاریخی و پیش بینی شده 📈 برآورد EPS سال 1405 : 260 تومان (با سرمایه جدید) 🗓 منبع تحلیل : مهر آیندگان @Tahlil_Nameh
❤8
📑 تحلیل بنیادی #فملی 🏢 ارزش بازار: 2268 همت 📶 سهام شناور:40٪ 💵 آخرین درصد تقسیم سود: 30٪ 💰 قیمت روز: 1575 تومان 📈 برآورد EPS سال 1405 : 260 تومان (با سرمایه جدید) 📊 نسبت P/E پیشرو: 6 🗓 منبع تحلیل : مهر آیندگان @Tahlil_Nameh
❤5
#غمایه صورت سود و زیان تاریخی و پیش بینی شده 🗓 منبع تحلیل : تأمین سرمایه نوین @Tahlil_Nameh
❤5
📑 تحلیل بنیادی #غمایه 🏢 ارزش بازار: ۵.۱ همت 📶 سهام شناور: ۱۶٪ 💵 آخرین درصد تقسیم سود: ۶۰٪ 💰 قیمت روز: ۲,۰۰۷ تومان 📈 برآورد EPS سال ۱۴۰۵: ۴۵۶ تومان 📊 نسبت P/E پیشرو: ۴.۴ 🗓 منبع تحلیل : تأمین سرمایه نوین @Tahlil_Nameh
❤5
📚 به کانال «تحلیلنامه بورس» خوش آمدید. هدف این کانال، انتشار و بهاشتراکگذاری تحلیلهای بنیادی شرکتهای بورس ایران، به همراه گزارشهای تحلیلی نهادهای مالی معتبر و بررسی آنها است. تلاش میکنم محتواها بهصورت منظم، خلاصه و کاربردی منتشر شوند تا در تصمیمگیری سرمایهگذاران مفید باشند. از همراهی شما سپاسگزارم. بهزودی اولین تحلیلها منتشر خواهد شد. @Tahlil_Nameh
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Tahlil_Nameh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 318,005 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تحلیل نامه بورس” (@Tahlil_Nameh), 1,963 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tahlil_Nameh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.