Channel
@Taccez_Security
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003773035858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Taccez_Security |
| Created | 20 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Taccez_Security |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 2 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 3 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇰🇿 15 млн қозоғистонликнинг шахсий маълумотлари даркнетда тарқаб кетди. 2,7 ГБлик базада 47 млн қатор — паспорт, телефон рақами, парол, иш жойи ва ҳужжат сканлари бор. Хакер бу учун 0,5 биткоин — қарийб 32 минг доллар сўрамоқда.
Hack – tizimga ruxsatsiz kirish. Crack – himoyani buzish Bypass – himoyani chetlab o‘tish.
🔐 Phishing — Internetdagi eng keng tarqalgan firibgarlik usullaridan biri! Phishing — bu firibgarlar sizni aldab, parol, bank karta ma’lumotlari yoki shaxsiy ma’lumotlaringizni qo‘lga kiritishga harakat qiladigan usul. Ular odatda o‘zlarini bank, mashhur sayt yoki xizmat nomidan yuborilgan xabar sifatida ko‘rsatishadi. ⚠️ Phishing qanday ko‘rinishda bo‘ladi? • “Hisobingiz bloklandi, darhol kirib tasdiqlang!” kabi…
👍2❤1
💻 Hacker kim o‘zi? Ko‘pchilik "hacker" deganda kompyuterlarni buzadigan odamni tasavvur qiladi. Ammo aslida bu tushuncha bundan ancha keng. "Hacker" - bu kompyuter texnologiyalarini chuqur biladigan, tizimlarni o‘rganadigan va ularni yanada mukammal qilishga harakat qiladigan insondir. Ular murakkab muammolarga noodatiy yechim topa oladi va texnologiya sirlarini o‘rganishni yoqtiradi. Hackerlarning asosiy turl…
Shodan xaqida qisqacha!
🤖 Moltbot haqida eshitdingizmi..?
Internet ishlamay qolsa nima boladi!? ©haad
🔥1
#tushuntirish Bu turdagi xarakatlar aslida Foydalanuvchilar uchun emas balkim Kompanyalarni zaifliklarini Hususiy Cyber Security xodimlari tomonidan aniqlanib kompanyaga habar beriladi. Kompanya esa uni o'rganib chiqib xavfli kirish tomonlarini tuzatadi. Zaifliklarni yo'qotadi. Shuning uchun Doimo yangilanishlar bilan yuring!
#Google_chrome #zaiflik Google Chrome'da CSS komponentidagi Use-After-Free xatosi (xotiradan bo'shatilgan obyektga qayta murojat) CVSS bali: 8.8 (yuqori xavf darajasi) Maxsus tayyorlangan veb-sahifa orqali hujum qilinadi. Hujum natijasi: -Masofadan ixtiyoriy kod ishga tushurish -Sanbox ichida ham zararli harakatlar -hech qanday yuklab olishsiz faqat saytga kirish yetarli! 2026-yildagi birinchi faol Chrome-zero-day!…
#apple #zaiflik CVE-2026-20700 nima? DyLD (Dynamic link editor) komponentidagi xotira buzulishi (memory corruption). Hujumchi ixtyoriy kodni ishga tushurishi mumkin edi.! Bu zaiflik 10+ yillik iOS versiyalarida mavjud edi. Hujum qanday bo'lgan? O'ta murakkab (extremely sophisticated) hujum! Maxsus nishonga olingan shaxslarga qarshi josuslik dasturlari (spyware) zanjiri sifatida qo'llanilgan. (buni) Google Threa…
👍1
#Mobiuz #Cyber_xujum 16-fevral kuni Darknet forumida (breachforums): "Mobiuz serveriga kirdim, ichki ma'lumotlar, xatlar, hujjatlar qo'limda" deb da'vo qildi. Hatto CVE-2024-6235 zaifligidan foydalanganini ham aytdi. (ammo bu haqida rasmiy tasdiq yo'q) Manba'larga ko'ra: Ha kiberhujum bo'lgan ammo Test serverga kirish bo'lgan! Asosiy serverlar va mijoz ma'lumotlari zarar ko'rmagan! Mijozlar shaxsiy ma'lumotlari (…
👍1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Taccez_Security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cyber Security” (@Taccez_Security), 2 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Taccez_Security.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.