Channel

🎭台灣星火🎭

@TWspark

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

38subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001389749382
Type	Channel
Username	@TWspark
Description	臉書粉絲專頁《台灣星火》的Telegram頻道。分享台灣政治、社會、文化議題相關的個人記錄。
Created	Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	28 August 2026
Last confirmed live	29 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/TWspark

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
28 Aug 2026, 20:00	38	no change
28 Aug 2026, 19:46	38	first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 101
Links: 210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2023, 22:20 UTC130 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

🚀 Looking for the next big investment opportunity in the world of cryptocurrency? Look no further than $HORSEA! 🔥 Our ultra-deflationary token is designed to become more scarce over time, with all $HORSEA holders earning more $HORSEA and BUSD just by holding coins in their wallet. And now, for a limited time only, we're offering an exciting airdrop exclusively for our Telegram community! To participate, all you nee…

Signed Арина Вишневская

26 Mar 2023, 23:14 UTC98 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

Signed Арина Вишневская

26 Mar 2023, 00:01 UTC76 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

Signed Арина Вишневская

20 Oct 2022, 19:05 UTC178 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 台灣星火

19 Oct 2022, 23:04 UTC161 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

不意外，這就是台灣星火臉書帳號最後的下場了。

Signed 台灣星火

11 Oct 2022, 04:12 UTC533 viewsread 28 August 2026

#自我感覺良好蔡英文的國慶文告充份詮釋了，所謂的「文青體」有多令人厭惡。把國際情勢的險惡、內政經濟的缺失、民主體制的敗壞、人民承受的壓迫和不公…全都用唯心論來個自我陶醉。整篇可以濃縮成一句話：「我覺得我做的不錯，說我不好的都是中共同路人，我不會放過你們。」這個總統，如今是台灣之恥、是對台灣民主的最大嘲諷，但別忘了，她是2016年台灣人為了打倒國民黨而成就的。然而八年過去，她對台灣造成的傷害猶勝馬英九。前事不忘後事之師，「為了拉下誰而盲目美化並支持誰」只會繼續重蹈覆轍。堅持做能讓掌權者畏懼、不安的選擇，就算一時選輸了，但上台的政客也會累積顧忌。相對的，繼續淪為政黨此興彼消的操弄受眾，藍綠白眾蔡英文之流只會更加肆無忌憚。

Signed 台灣星火

22 Sept 2022, 05:26 UTC156 viewsread 28 August 2026

#高虹安的哭卻讓我笑了她是真的搞不懂塔綠班？還是幕僚給她的人設混亂？前一天高虹安在記者會上嗆得氣勢十足，我還覺得她有點看頭，結果隔一天就被塔綠班操弄道德綁架搞哭了？塔綠班們只是被嗆到體無完膚，發個煙霧彈測試她的弱點而已，妳示弱牠們就會咬上了，沒想到她真上勾了。塔綠班的手法跟中共小粉紅一個樣，你跟牠講道理時，牠跟你比拳頭；你掄起拳頭了，牠開始說你不講道理。對這種下三濫的對手，管牠講什麼，往死裏打就好。之所以會被塔綠班反制，在我看來是台灣人長期被環境養出的假掰心態作祟。所謂假掰，就是心口不一。明明台灣人就是會用學歷把人分三六九等，但偏偏嘴上很習慣裝成不是。也許高虹安原本就是針對林智堅，而不是中華大學；但不管是有人被操弄也好、有人真的心理不平衡也好，要解釋成她在歧視學歷是那些人的自由，理這些人幹嘛？就算高虹安真的看不起中華大學又怎麼樣？為何一定要裝好人？我不是個學歷至上的人，但我尊重那些在學業上拼死拼活也要上知…

Signed 台灣星火

21 Sept 2022, 04:36 UTC490 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

#台灣人就是與危機共存的種族在今天這個日子發佈的地震警報測試，對經歷了幾天前的連續強震之後的台灣人而言，也許光是手機警訊就足以嚇出一身冷汗。這讓我想起過去在南投的921記念館看過的資料。根據過去22年的地震記錄顯示，台灣南北各有一道頻繁發生地震的版塊邊界，這讓台灣這塊土地的出現有了一個推測：是否台灣島本身就是兩個板塊因地殼變動擠壓而壟起的陸地。也就是說：台灣就是因地震而出現的。而活在這塊島嶼上的台灣人，其實也就命定要與危機共存，活在天地威嚇之下。除非遠離這塊土地，我們都難逃與之共存的命運。但我個人並不認為這是不幸，雖然憾事在所難免。也許有一天，天地威壓的後果也會毫不留情的落在我身上，因為我是台灣人。難道我要因為生在台灣感到不幸？正相反，因為如此，我始終不相信，台灣這塊土地上最終會養不出自由無畏、勇敢無懼的台灣人。台灣人天生就該俱備對抗未知恐懼的能力，註定要在無法與之抗衡的威脅下活出自我。有人用戰爭威脅我們，有…

Signed 台灣星火

20 Aug 2022, 16:53 UTC612 viewsread 28 August 2026

#塔綠班為何敢推數位中介服務法 1. 蘇貞昌暫緩公聽會的理由：「等大家都可以接受...」云云，這說法指的並不是要檢討草案或作法，台灣人不要誤會了。他的真意是說：等台灣人不注意、不關心、不留神的時候，我綠共就繼續推動(你不反對，就是接受)。 2. 中國投降黨一票見獵心喜狂批塔綠班破壞言論自由的人根本是精神錯亂。限縮網路言論自由是中共的特色管理，中共在其國內的實際作為，比這次綠共推動的惡法更邪惡、嚴密。而這票人既然覺得中共偉大、光榮、正確，覺得台灣人要接受中共統治是未來，那現在還反網路管制幹嘛？他們都能降赤共了，還用自由的標準針貶綠共...呵~自己都不覺得矛盾和噁心嗎？ 3. 主張『台灣不該激怒中共』的人，也沒必要反《數位中介服務法》，原因有三：第一是沒用第二是這種人甚實根本不在乎第三是會讓綠共變本加厲赤共能讓他們妥協，但綠共不能；其真正差別根本不是自由，而是『誰能讓他害怕』。所以這種主張只會讓綠共的手段越來越粗暴，…

Signed 台灣星火

5 Aug 2022, 00:33 UTC543 viewsread 28 August 2026

Photo

#Pelosi訪台最有益的事我個人對現今的美國左派一點都沒好感，包括Nancy Pelosi。別跟我說她年輕時多反共就代表她現在多反共；年輕時傲骨崢崢，年老時晚節不保的例子台灣人還少見嗎？最出名的那位現在不就在監察院？雖然如此，但我還是支持Pelosi訪台，國際訪客以禮待之，是自由國家的基本體現。至於她訪台所帶給台灣的每一種動盪，從一開始的中國最後通牒、到最後中共軍演、飛彈實射，在我個人來看都是對台灣很有益的事。 1. 再一次對台灣人實證：對共產黨主和其實就是主降。台灣這次根本沒做什麼，只是接待個國際訪客，而在中共眼裡連這都是挑釁，那台灣除了投降還有什麼不是挑釁？這就像有畜牲要人跟牠一樣四肢著地的活著，而人只是站起來就會得罪牠；這時主張：「那我們別站就好啦」的人，可以說成愛好和平？你妥協的是人的本質，不是投降是什麼？ 2. 再一次對台灣人實證：台灣的處境是什麼。中共武嚇和飛彈實射是Pelosi的錯？是台灣的錯？都…

Signed 台灣星火

1 Jun 2022, 06:38 UTC390 viewsread 28 August 2026

#厲害了塔綠班網路包裝下的文青女，現實中是個犯傷害罪的前科男，真符合塔綠班從上到下的強盜氣質~👍 摘自裁判書：核被告李建葦所為，係犯刑法第310條第2項之散布文字誹謗罪。又被告於時空密接之情形下，先後為前揭加重誹謗之數次舉動，均係侵害同一告訴人之名譽法益，應係接續犯，以實質一罪論。爰審酌『被告前曾犯傷害罪，經法院判處拘役之刑，且已執行完畢』，有臺灣高等法院被告前案紀錄表附卷可稽，素行非佳... https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220601000065-260405?from=CTfans&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=comment&fbclid=IwAR32TWq8px7avTp8e2Zqtx30UI8e77bSpS33C0ET40s84SYBVqJQmqKo8SA&fs=e&s=cl

Signed 台灣星火

23 May 2022, 19:16 UTC134 viewsread 28 August 2026

我幾乎要懷疑拜登並不是老糊塗了，台灣才剛有點機會清醒點，他老兄講句話就把台灣人又拖進幻影泡泡裡了。我剛看到有人說美國從823砲戰開始就軍事協防台灣，所以本來就會出兵。那時有中美共同防禦條約好嗎？那個中是中華民國。現在有嗎？ https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/3936168?fbclid=IwAR1TTxZIC_XyGNjid2eA1oNU0qeYmuJ61sjMgA7D34l7WSqNF_r3OuEgW-Y

Signed 台灣星火

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TWspark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

时政相关频道
@c4democracy · 371 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

HorseaFi - Verify Portal || Certik || CMC || CG 🔮
@HorseaAnnouncement · 3213 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 1; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 1; vacant every time we have ever looked

@TWspark named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@ettodaynet
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎭台灣星火🎭” (@TWspark), 38 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TWspark.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.