Channel
@TWIT_VIP
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
96subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001623283552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TWIT_VIP |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TWIT_VIP |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 96 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 97 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 98 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:39 | 99 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 100 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
📬 #Grayscale The digital asset industry has operated for roughly 17 years without CLARITY, and it will keep doing so. The Senate delayed its vote on the CLARITY Act, but the impact is minimal. Regulatory guidance and SEC are already helping build the framework for tokenized assets, pushing 더 보기 https://t.co/IGpflWgC4r 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Eric_Balchunas 🚩 [#ETF] The bitcoin [#ETF]s just clocked their best week in flows (about $1b) since April and the 3rd best week since the good ole days were ruined by the Silent IPO last Oct. IBIT, FBTC and few others saw inflows every single day since Coldcard hack, making it hard not to see causation in 더 보기 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Eric_Balchunas 🚩 [#ETF] CHART OF THE WEEK: Equity [#ETF] flows during weeks when the S&P 500 is red. This dip buying army is made up of both degens and Vanguardians, an odd couple, but this is what the bears are up against. Good luck with that.. via @psarofagis 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #vitalik.eth Update: looks like it will require payment and there's no mention of any cryptocurrency option (which would provide a pathway for privacy) https://t.co/8PBOxnlV7I 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Grayscale What does your favorite protocol say about you? $TAO $LINK $SOL $AVAX $SUI $HYPE $ZEC $BTC $ETH $XRP 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Grayscale What does your favorite protocol say about you? $TAO $LINK $SOL $AVAX $SUI $HYPE $ZEC $BTC $ETH $XRP 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Eric_Balchunas 🚩 [#ETF] Mike Green (aka @profplum99 ) is leaving Simplify to launch new [#ETF] and SMA firm w/ the goal of converting his research on passive into implementable products, scoop via @denitsa_tsekova 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Eric_Balchunas 🚩 [#ETF] Here's the latest 'New Launch Review' episode of Trillions. This month's Big Splash is $IQQ & $SKUU , the Wild Card is $TKNZ and our Good Luck with That is $YSAU , the The Y'ALL Street Gold [#ETF] w/ @isabelletanlee https://youtu.be/xBvF-luRxFc?si=eyw949n6XojXYMyb… via @YouTube 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #vitalik.eth "everyone is weird somewhere" about high-dimensional spaces, made by claude fable 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #vitalik.eth Minimax H3 is the first *open* video model I've seen that outperforms HunyuanVideo 1.5 - which is actually an impressive accomplishment for @TencentHunyuan to have held that throne for so long. For a while now I've been sad that the image/video frontier seemed to be getting much 더 보기 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #vitalik.eth Very welcome recent news from Signal: they are working on letting you register an account without a phone number. https://aboutsignal.com/news/signal-is-working-on-registration-without-a-phone-number/… That said, an important counterpoint about what this would and would not accomplish. The good #1: reducing dependence on phone numbers. 더 보기 https://t.co/W8GGKCbONq 🔗 트위터보기
📬 #Eric_Balchunas 🚩 [#ETF] $BWET (oil shipping futures in middle east) best performing [#ETF] (again) for the past month, YTD returns now 1,294%! Insane. 5x more than any other [#ETF] and yet still no one cares. It's odd, the degens are out in full too. Sometimes fishing is like this, you can literally see the 더 보기 🔗 트위터보기
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TWIT_VIP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TWIT_VIP named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐦트위터 코인정보 (주요인물)” (@TWIT_VIP), 96 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TWIT_VIP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.