🇹🇼 柔柔 -26y 🌟#台南 😊161cm-45kg-D+ ⏪#媛VIP可申請本人照群⏩ 🎀淫業時間:13:00~01:00 輕熟女服務多經驗豐富床上的技術更是一流主動叫你幫她口 體力超好 小穴無毛粉嫩 讓你抽插到小穴的最深處一股暖流熱熱的 配合度高 ❤️喝茶點擊下方⬇️ https://t.me/y99c1QAQ 老司機🔞帶你上高速 https://t.me/owo618 媛媛獨家熱門客評🦋 https://t.me/JYvv0618 北部🍵排班表排班表✨ 🔗https://t.me/koitb618 中部🍵排班表排班表✨ 🔗https://t.me/koitz618 南部🍵排班表排班表✨ 🔗https://t.me/koitn618 💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫 😊私訊媛媛預約↓ 🌃 飛機:@koi618 ⭐Gleezy:y69xu 📱LINE:koi6181

Channel
吸精熟女專區🇹🇼
@TW6618
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
310subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002116693645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TW6618 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TW6618 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 310 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 308 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 308 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.8%
- avg views ÷ 310 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 49.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (24 June 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 49 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤1
https://t.me/koi618 茶不思 就思哥哥 飯不想 就想業績 我親愛的哥哥 歡迎城域網良藥 小單緩解症狀 大單直接治愈
📢 寶寶們注意一下‼️重要提醒‼️ 🆘今天有客人私訊跟媛媛反饋 說最近發現有一個帳號的使用方式 說話方式 甚至發布內容看起來都跟媛媛非常相似 讓人容易混淆 這位客人也有幫媛媛去確認情況 提醒媛媛一定要跟大家說一聲 請大家提高警惕‼️ 目前發現的情況大概是:拿媛媛一樣的頭像換上她的頭貼上 (目前媛已經換頭貼並加上水印啦) 在拿媛頻道的照片去給你介紹妹妹 寶寶們一定要保護好自己的資訊和安全喔💗 網路上有時候會出現冒充帳號 假冒身份的情況 大家不要只看名稱 頭像或聊天方式相似 就直接認定對方是真正的媛媛 🆘媛想提醒大家: ✅ 賺U的其他綫上支付的100%詐騙 ✅ 遇到先轉賬的一定不是媛媛 ✅ 一定要認準媛的賬號 ✅ 遇到奇怪要求一定要先停一下 多確認 謝謝寶寶們一直以來的支持和提醒 也謝謝幫媛媛注意這些細節的客人 希望大家都能提高警覺 保護好自己的時間 資訊和權益✨
📢 ⭐ 重要公告 近期出現冒名詐騙 請所有哥哥務必留意 甚至還加上【主】很吸眼的字 用同一個ID 近期有客人主動聯繫媛媛 表示遇到有人冒用媛媛的名義與照片 和媛的飛機設定都一樣 甚至假冒以介紹妹妹約妹妹的方式要求你們使用 U支付 虛擬貨幣 電子錢包 線上付款 或提前支付訂金 保證金 車馬費等費用 在這裡鄭重提醒大家: 🚨媛媛這裏都是就見面滿意收現金 🚨媛媛從來沒有要求使用任何線上支付或虛擬貨幣交易! ✅我們一直以來的消費方式只有一個原則:見面滿意 再現金消費 除了現場面對面確認滿意後給現金交易之外 任何要求: ❌線上付款 ❌U支付 ❌ 虛擬貨幣 ❌ 電子錢包轉帳 ❌ 訂金 ❌ 保證金 ❌ 排班費 ❌ 車馬費 ❌ 解凍金 ❌ 驗證金 ❌ 任何名義的預付款 一律都是詐騙!請不要相信 也不要付款! ❗️❗️❗️注意:⭐ 近期這類新型詐騙越來越多 詐騙集團會盜用照片 冒充客服 甚至偽…
✨7月生日寵粉月 限時5活動 ✨ 🌸七月 只想好好寵哥哥們 謝謝一直支持媛的每一位哥哥❤️ 七月開始 準備了很多限定福利 只有4~9號可以參加! 🎲 幸運骰子挑戰 今日成功預約指定妹妹即可參加💸 🎁每位哥哥都能搖一次骰子 最高可享3000元優惠 不同點數對應不同驚喜: 🎲 5 折扣優惠8.5折 🎲 免費延時10分鐘 🎲 升級福利加等級 🎲 神秘禮物等着你 🦋 新朋友體驗禮 第一次找媛預約的哥哥 💝可享新客專屬福利 不知道怎麼挑妹妹也沒關係 媛會依照你的喜好推薦 降低踩雷機會 🤍老朋友回歸禮 超過 30天沒有回來的哥哥 私訊媛即可領取 🦋回歸限定優惠 好久不見 這次讓媛好好照顧你 🎁神秘盲盒 今天成功預約 即可獲得一份神秘驚喜 直到見面前都不知道內容 讓期待感直接拉滿 🍀 七月好運祭 七月新的開始 送自己一點放鬆 也替整個月開啟好運🦋 活動期間皆享有限定福利 名額有限 額滿恢復原價 💌分享有禮 將活動分享給朋友 或分享到限時動…
有些故事不需要公開 有些安排只留給主動的人 聯繫方式放在這裡 剩下的 等你來開啟 https://t.me/koi618
📢 ⭐ 重要公告 近期出現冒名詐騙 請所有哥哥務必留意 近期有客人主動聯繫媛媛 表示遇到有人冒用媛媛的名義與照片 和媛的飛機設定都一樣 甚至假冒以介紹妹妹約妹妹的方式要求你們使用 U支付 虛擬貨幣 電子錢包 線上付款 或提前支付訂金 保證金 車馬費等費用 在這裡鄭重提醒大家: 🚨媛媛這裏都是就見面滿意收現金 🚨媛媛從來沒有要求使用任何線上支付或虛擬貨幣交易! ✅我們一直以來的消費方式只有一個原則:見面滿意 再現金消費 除了現場面對面確認滿意後給現金交易之外 任何要求: ❌線上付款 ❌U支付 ❌ 虛擬貨幣 ❌ 電子錢包轉帳 ❌ 訂金 ❌ 保證金 ❌ 排班費 ❌ 車馬費 ❌ 解凍金 ❌ 驗證金 ❌ 任何名義的預付款 一律都是詐騙!請不要相信 也不要付款! ❗️❗️❗️注意:⭐ 近期這類新型詐騙越來越多 詐騙集團會盜用照片 冒充客服 甚至偽造聊天紀錄 讓人誤以為是真的 很多人就是因為…
⭐Gleezy:y69xu 記得加上哦~這樣的話就不會聯繫不上啦 媛的LINE最近出來一點問題 可以加媛的Gleezy :y69xu
吸精熟女專區🇹🇼 pinned «LINE暫時無法登陸 有需要可以先私訊媛媛的TG或Gleezy 🌃 飛機:@koi618 ⭐Gleezy:koi618»
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @TW6618. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,302,247 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吸精熟女專區🇹🇼” (@TW6618), 310 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TW6618.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.